國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

中國大陸反不正當競爭法制之研析 = The Analysis of th...

國立高雄大學法律學系碩士班

中國大陸反不正當競爭法制之研析 = The Analysis of the Institution of the Anti-unfair Competition Law of PRC

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : 單行本
並列題名:	The Analysis of the Institution of the Anti-unfair Competition Law of PRC
作者:	莊朝將,
其他團體作者:	國立高雄大學
出版地:	[高雄市]
出版者:	撰者;
出版年:	2008[民97]
面頁冊數:	179面圖，表 : 30公分;
標題:	仿冒
標題:	piracy
電子資源:	http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/52513301747649672628
附註:	指導教授：紀振清
附註:	參考書目：面12-132
附註:	附錄：中華人民共和國反不正當競爭法等9種
摘要註:	在現今繁雜之工商社會，隨經濟政策之重點已由過去之產業政策主導，演變為市場競爭導向，有關商品或服務之項目亦隨之增多，然而經營者卻不乏以各種不正當之競爭手段，藉以達成其行銷之目的。例如，利用虛偽不實之廣告、仿冒、商業賄賂或侵犯商業秘密等不正當競爭手段，而嚴重擾亂營業競爭秩序妨害、國家經濟之發展。政府為保障市場之公平競爭，確保消費者權益，以公權力介入經營者之違法行為，已係責無旁貸之事。臺灣「公平交易法」施行多年以來，公平交易觀念逐漸落實，並為社會各界所肯定。惟近年來，國內外經濟結構快速轉變，政經發展亦一日千里，故競爭法制亦須不斷調整以應實際之需。隨著兩岸經貿關係日益密切，中國大陸已自1993年12月1日開始施行《反不正當競爭法》，故而往來於臺灣與中國大陸間之企業，自應妥善調整其生產、行銷等策略，以因應兩岸競爭法制之差異。本文除探討美、德、日、臺灣及中國大陸競爭法發展、法益之保護、基本原則等理論外，係以中國大陸反不正當競爭法制之研析為中心，並比較、研析兩岸反不正當競爭之規範；以有助於台商從事大陸投資企業之競爭與發展，並期能提供臺灣「公平交易法」未來之修法參考。 In this complicated profit-seeking society nowadays, the focus of the economic strategy has changed from taking the industry as a predominant role to the market competition as the leading role. Therefore, there are a number of commodities or services, and a lot of operators who use various illegal measures in order to achieve the intention of selling products. For instance, we can see the wrong acts by using false advertising, piracy products, commercial bribery or invading commercial secrets. All of these disturb seriously the order of competition business operation as well as hindering the development of country’s economy. It is indispensable for the government use public power to intervene the illegal acts of operators in order to maintain the fair competition of the market and protect the customers’ rights. Since the implementation of the “Law of Fair Trading “ for some years, the concept of fair trading has been carried out and is approved by the society. However, the Laws of Competition have to keep adjusting to meet the realistic situation in the society due to the fast transformation of economy structure and the politics make a progress at a tremendous pace both in our country and foreign countries. With the intense relationships in business trading between Mainland China and Taiwan, the former has implemented“The Law of anti-unfair competition of the People’s Republic of China”in December 1, 1993. As a consequence, the enterprises in Mainland China and Taiwan have to adjust their market strategies in order to adjust the difference between them on the Laws of Competition. This research aims at probing into the developments and protections of Law and basic principles along with other theories in America, Germany, Japan, Taiwan and Mainland China. In addition, it also takes“the Anti-unfair Competition Law of the People’s Republic of China”as the target to analyze all the legislations related anti-unfair competition of the PRC, and then it shall compare and analyze with the merits and practices of Taiwan’s “Fair Trade Law”. At last, this

中國大陸反不正當競爭法制之研析 = The Analysis of the Institution of the Anti-unfair Competition Law of PRC
莊, 朝將

中國大陸反不正當競爭法制之研析 = The Analysis of the Institution of the Anti-unfair Competition Law of PRC / 莊朝將撰 - [高雄市] : 撰者, 2008[民97]. - 179面 ; 圖，表 ; 30公分.
指導教授：紀振清參考書目：面12-132附錄：中華人民共和國反不正當競爭法等9種.
仿冒piracy

中國大陸反不正當競爭法制之研析 = The Analysis of the Institution of the Anti-unfair Competition Law of PRC
LDR:04807nam0a2200301 450 001 133549
005 20170214090551.0
009 133549
010 0 $b 精裝
010 0 $b 平裝
100 $a 20170214y2008 k y0chiy09 e
101 1 $a chi $d chi $d eng
102 $a tw
105 $a ak am 000yy
200 1 $a 中國大陸反不正當競爭法制之研析 $d The Analysis of the Institution of the Anti-unfair Competition Law of PRC $z eng $f 莊朝將撰
210 $a [高雄市] $c 撰者 $d 2008[民97]
215 0 $a 179面 $c 圖，表 $d 30公分
300 $a 指導教授：紀振清
300 $a 參考書目：面12-132
300 $a 附錄：中華人民共和國反不正當競爭法等9種
328 $a 碩士論文--國立高雄大學法律學系碩士班
330 $a 在現今繁雜之工商社會，隨經濟政策之重點已由過去之產業政策主導，演變為市場競爭導向，有關商品或服務之項目亦隨之增多，然而經營者卻不乏以各種不正當之競爭手段，藉以達成其行銷之目的。例如，利用虛偽不實之廣告、仿冒、商業賄賂或侵犯商業秘密等不正當競爭手段，而嚴重擾亂營業競爭秩序妨害、國家經濟之發展。政府為保障市場之公平競爭，確保消費者權益，以公權力介入經營者之違法行為，已係責無旁貸之事。臺灣「公平交易法」施行多年以來，公平交易觀念逐漸落實，並為社會各界所肯定。惟近年來，國內外經濟結構快速轉變，政經發展亦一日千里，故競爭法制亦須不斷調整以應實際之需。隨著兩岸經貿關係日益密切，中國大陸已自1993年12月1日開始施行《反不正當競爭法》，故而往來於臺灣與中國大陸間之企業，自應妥善調整其生產、行銷等策略，以因應兩岸競爭法制之差異。本文除探討美、德、日、臺灣及中國大陸競爭法發展、法益之保護、基本原則等理論外，係以中國大陸反不正當競爭法制之研析為中心，並比較、研析兩岸反不正當競爭之規範；以有助於台商從事大陸投資企業之競爭與發展，並期能提供臺灣「公平交易法」未來之修法參考。 In this complicated profit-seeking society nowadays, the focus of the economic strategy has changed from taking the industry as a predominant role to the market competition as the leading role. Therefore, there are a number of commodities or services, and a lot of operators who use various illegal measures in order to achieve the intention of selling products. For instance, we can see the wrong acts by using false advertising, piracy products, commercial bribery or invading commercial secrets. All of these disturb seriously the order of competition business operation as well as hindering the development of country’s economy. It is indispensable for the government use public power to intervene the illegal acts of operators in order to maintain the fair competition of the market and protect the customers’ rights. Since the implementation of the “Law of Fair Trading “ for some years, the concept of fair trading has been carried out and is approved by the society. However, the Laws of Competition have to keep adjusting to meet the realistic situation in the society due to the fast transformation of economy structure and the politics make a progress at a tremendous pace both in our country and foreign countries. With the intense relationships in business trading between Mainland China and Taiwan, the former has implemented“The Law of anti-unfair competition of the People’s Republic of China”in December 1, 1993. As a consequence, the enterprises in Mainland China and Taiwan have to adjust their market strategies in order to adjust the difference between them on the Laws of Competition. This research aims at probing into the developments and protections of Law and basic principles along with other theories in America, Germany, Japan, Taiwan and Mainland China. In addition, it also takes“the Anti-unfair Competition Law of the People’s Republic of China”as the target to analyze all the legislations related anti-unfair competition of the PRC, and then it shall compare and analyze with the merits and practices of Taiwan’s “Fair Trade Law”. At last, this
510 1 $a The Analysis of the Institution of the Anti-unfair Competition Law of PRC $z eng
610 0 $a 仿冒 $a 商業賄賂 $a 商業秘密 $a 公平交易法 $a 反不正當競爭法
610 1 $a piracy $a commercial bribes $a commercial secrets $a Fair Trade Law $a Anti-unfair Competition Law
681 $a 008M/0019 $b 380101 4442 $v 增訂八版
700 1 $a 莊 $b 朝將 $4 撰 $3 166043
712 0 2 $a 國立高雄大學 $b 法律學系碩士班 $3 166036
801 0 $a tw $b NUK $c 20081009 $g CCR
801 1 $a tw $b NUK $c 20081009 $g CCR
856 7 $z 電子資源 $2 http $u http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/52513301747649672628