國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

異質混合寡占市場技術研發投資，補貼與併購之策略分析 = R&D INVE...

國立高雄大學經濟管理研究所

異質混合寡占市場技術研發投資，補貼與併購之策略分析 = R&D INVESTMENT, SUBSIDIZATION AND MERGER IN A DIFFERENTIATED MIXED OLIGOPOLY

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : 單行本
並列題名:	R&D INVESTMENT, SUBSIDIZATION AND MERGER IN A DIFFERENTIATED MIXED OLIGOPOLY
作者:	楊苔琳,
其他團體作者:	國立高雄大學
出版地:	[高雄市]
出版者:	撰者;
出版年:	2008[民97]
面頁冊數:	78面圖，表 : 30公分;
標題:	R&D
標題:	R&D
電子資源:	http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/30853500908635872934
附註:	指導教授：王鳳生
附註:	參考書目：面60-63
其他題名:	異質混合寡占市場技術研發投資,補貼與併購之策略分析
其他題名:	異質混合寡占市場技術研發投資補貼與併購之策略分析
摘要註:	面對快速進步、競爭愈激烈的環境，廠商勢必要採取一些策略活動來維持其優勢地位以防止被對手淘汰，其可透過併購，合資，從事研發技術(R&D)或共同研發等方式來維持其競爭力。本研究主要在一個混合寡占市場廠商從事技術研發活動下，探討廠商併購決策，策略研發活動(獨自研發或合作研發)與政府補貼政策之分析。研究結果發現在混合同質寡占市場上廠商從事技術研發活動來降低其生產成本，公民營廠商承諾合作研發且兩方議價其所研發合作投資量的比重，當公營廠商有較高的議價能力時，對整體福利是有提升的作用。此外，技術研發合作可加速技術創新、降低生產成本與重複投資成本並可達到综效(synergy effect)使廠商有更高的誘因從事研發合作。在混合異質雙占市場，廠商從事技術研發活動降低其生產成本會進而降低其併購的誘因，但沒有從事技術研發活動之廠商的併購誘因會增加，研究發現，公民營廠商同時從事R&D會使總產量與社會福利最高，然而，一旦有一家廠商從事技術研發活動，廠商將不會有意願併購成一家多產品廠商(multi-product firm)。存在政府干預的情況下，正廠同時對對廠商採R&D與產量補貼的補貼額最高，其次是對產量補貼之政策，最低的補貼額是對R&D補貼之政策。政府補貼政策可以降低生產不足與過度生產的問題。若政府只採用一種補貼政策，產量補貼政策優於對R&D投資量的補貼政策。然而，政府同時對產量與R&D投資量補貼(mixed-subsidized policy)不但可以解決生產不足與過度生產的問題，並可以達到最佳配置(first-best )使成本極小以達社會最適境界。 Facing rapidly progress and more competitive environment, firms have to use some strategic ways to maintain their dominant positions prevent themselves from being eliminated by rivals; they can adopt strategic activities such as merger, joint venture, R&D or cooperative R&D to keep their competitiveness. The main purpose of this dissertation is to examine the merger decisions, strategic R&D behaviors (R&D competition and R&D cooperation) as well as government subsidization policies in the presence of process innovation activities under a mixed oligopolistic market.In the presence of cost-reducing R&D under a homogeneous mixed oligopoly market, if firms commit to cooperate on R&D where two parts of firm bargaining over the weight of their joint R&D, the overall welfare will enhance provided that public firm has higher bargaining power. Moreover, cooperation on innovation activity has many advantages such as accelerate technological innovations, reduce production cost and reinvestment cost, in addition, it can achieve an effect of synergy makes firm has more incentives to do so.Under a differentiated mixed duopoly market, firm engages in cost-reducing R&D to reduce its production cost makes it has lower incentive to merge, whereas it increases merger incentive in the absence of innovation activity. We found that two firms engage in R&D have the highest aggregate production as well as overall social welfare; however, once one part of firm engages in R&D activity, they would not like to merge and set up a multi-product firm which is owned by two sectors.In the government intervention policies, the government grants the most output subsidy of mixed-subsidized scheme to encourage firms engage in R&D activity, then, output subsidization scheme is lie in the middle while the

異質混合寡占市場技術研發投資，補貼與併購之策略分析 = R&D INVESTMENT, SUBSIDIZATION AND MERGER IN A DIFFERENTIATED MIXED OLIGOPOLY
楊, 苔琳

異質混合寡占市場技術研發投資，補貼與併購之策略分析 = R&D INVESTMENT, SUBSIDIZATION AND MERGER IN A DIFFERENTIATED MIXED OLIGOPOLY / 楊苔琳撰 - [高雄市] : 撰者, 2008[民97]. - 78面 ; 圖，表 ; 30公分.
指導教授：王鳳生參考書目：面60-63.
R&DR&D

異質混合寡占市場技術研發投資，補貼與併購之策略分析 = R&D INVESTMENT, SUBSIDIZATION AND MERGER IN A DIFFERENTIATED MIXED OLIGOPOLY
LDR:05040nam0a2200313 450 001 133613
005 20170214095542.0
009 133613
010 0 $b 精裝
010 0 $b 平裝
100 $a 20170214y2008 k y0chiy09 b
101 1 $a chi $d chi $d eng
102 $a tw
105 $a ak am 000yy
200 1 $a 異質混合寡占市場技術研發投資，補貼與併購之策略分析 $d R&D INVESTMENT, SUBSIDIZATION AND MERGER IN A DIFFERENTIATED MIXED OLIGOPOLY $f 楊苔琳撰
210 $a [高雄市] $c 撰者 $d 2008[民97]
215 0 $a 78面 $c 圖，表 $d 30公分
300 $a 指導教授：王鳳生
300 $a 參考書目：面60-63
328 $a 碩士論文--國立高雄大學經濟管理研究所
330 $a 面對快速進步、競爭愈激烈的環境，廠商勢必要採取一些策略活動來維持其優勢地位以防止被對手淘汰，其可透過併購，合資，從事研發技術(R&D)或共同研發等方式來維持其競爭力。本研究主要在一個混合寡占市場廠商從事技術研發活動下，探討廠商併購決策，策略研發活動(獨自研發或合作研發)與政府補貼政策之分析。研究結果發現在混合同質寡占市場上廠商從事技術研發活動來降低其生產成本，公民營廠商承諾合作研發且兩方議價其所研發合作投資量的比重，當公營廠商有較高的議價能力時，對整體福利是有提升的作用。此外，技術研發合作可加速技術創新、降低生產成本與重複投資成本並可達到综效(synergy effect)使廠商有更高的誘因從事研發合作。在混合異質雙占市場，廠商從事技術研發活動降低其生產成本會進而降低其併購的誘因，但沒有從事技術研發活動之廠商的併購誘因會增加，研究發現，公民營廠商同時從事R&D會使總產量與社會福利最高，然而，一旦有一家廠商從事技術研發活動，廠商將不會有意願併購成一家多產品廠商(multi-product firm)。存在政府干預的情況下，正廠同時對對廠商採R&D與產量補貼的補貼額最高，其次是對產量補貼之政策，最低的補貼額是對R&D補貼之政策。政府補貼政策可以降低生產不足與過度生產的問題。若政府只採用一種補貼政策，產量補貼政策優於對R&D投資量的補貼政策。然而，政府同時對產量與R&D投資量補貼(mixed-subsidized policy)不但可以解決生產不足與過度生產的問題，並可以達到最佳配置(first-best )使成本極小以達社會最適境界。 Facing rapidly progress and more competitive environment, firms have to use some strategic ways to maintain their dominant positions prevent themselves from being eliminated by rivals; they can adopt strategic activities such as merger, joint venture, R&D or cooperative R&D to keep their competitiveness. The main purpose of this dissertation is to examine the merger decisions, strategic R&D behaviors (R&D competition and R&D cooperation) as well as government subsidization policies in the presence of process innovation activities under a mixed oligopolistic market.In the presence of cost-reducing R&D under a homogeneous mixed oligopoly market, if firms commit to cooperate on R&D where two parts of firm bargaining over the weight of their joint R&D, the overall welfare will enhance provided that public firm has higher bargaining power. Moreover, cooperation on innovation activity has many advantages such as accelerate technological innovations, reduce production cost and reinvestment cost, in addition, it can achieve an effect of synergy makes firm has more incentives to do so.Under a differentiated mixed duopoly market, firm engages in cost-reducing R&D to reduce its production cost makes it has lower incentive to merge, whereas it increases merger incentive in the absence of innovation activity. We found that two firms engage in R&D have the highest aggregate production as well as overall social welfare; however, once one part of firm engages in R&D activity, they would not like to merge and set up a multi-product firm which is owned by two sectors.In the government intervention policies, the government grants the most output subsidy of mixed-subsidized scheme to encourage firms engage in R&D activity, then, output subsidization scheme is lie in the middle while the
510 1 $a R&D INVESTMENT, SUBSIDIZATION AND MERGER IN A DIFFERENTIATED MIXED OLIGOPOLY
517 1 $a 異質混合寡占市場技術研發投資,補貼與併購之策略分析 $z chi
517 1 $a 異質混合寡占市場技術研發投資補貼與併購之策略分析 $z chi
610 0 $a R&D $a 合作研發 $a 併購 $a 補貼政策 $a 產品差異化 $a 寡占競爭
610 1 $a R&D $a Cooperative R&D $a Merger $a Subsidization Policy $a Product Differentiation $a Oligopolistic Competition
681 $a 008M/0019 $b 301208 4641 $v 增訂八版
700 1 $a 楊 $b 苔琳 $4 撰 $3 166105
712 0 2 $a 國立高雄大學 $b 經濟管理研究所 $3 166103
801 0 $a tw $b NUK $c 20081020 $g CCR
801 1 $a tw $b NUK $c 20081020 $g CCR
856 7 $z 電子資源 $2 http $u http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/30853500908635872934