公法上金錢給付義務之行政執行調查研究 = The Study on Ad...
國立高雄大學法律學系碩士班

 

  • 公法上金錢給付義務之行政執行調查研究 = The Study on Administrative Investigation of Administrative Enforcement in the Monetary Payment of Public Law
  • 紀錄類型: 書目-語言資料,印刷品 : 單行本
    並列題名: The Study on Administrative Investigation of Administrative Enforcement in the Monetary Payment of Public Law
    作者: 陳淑芬,
    其他團體作者: 國立高雄大學
    出版地: [高雄市]
    出版者: 撰者;
    出版年: 2009[民98]
    面頁冊數: [15], 184面30公分;
    標題: 行政執行
    標題: administrative execution
    電子資源: http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/93449856700329793574
    附註: 指導教授:陳正根
    附註: 參考書目:面179-184
    摘要註: 公法上金錢給付義務之行政執行調查研究指導教授:陳 正 根 博士(教授)學生:陳 淑 芬 國立高雄大學法學系(研究所)摘 要 公法上金錢給付之能否實現,攸關國家之財政暨社會、衛生、福利等措施之完善與否,社會秩序據以維護,公共利益賴以增進,行政上之強制執行較民事上之強制執行更具高度公益性,是無容置疑的。行政強制執行係違反當事人意志,運用強制力敦促義務人履行其公法上金錢給付義務,執行機關如何遵守法律授權分際,藉以達成確保國家債權實現之行政目的,與兼顧人民權益維護的雙贏局面,確實須靠不斷的實務運作與學說修正之磨合。行政執行調查態樣多樣,惟大多脫離不了確立義務人財產範圍之目的,行政執行處依職權調查義務人財產狀況時,其調查對象,除了義務人本身外,尚有向第三人為調查之情形存在。而於調查程序中,可能產生的權利衝突,例如:義務人有無緘默權之適用?受調查對象對於執行調查所提供之資料,將使自已或他人受刑事追訴時,是否亦有刑事法上「不自證己罪原則」的適用?而執行調查所得證據,可否逕為刑事判決所引用?都勢將影響到受調查對象之權益。另第三人協力義務界限為何?協力義務與資訊自決權衝突時,於強化調查功能之公益與保障人民權利之私益間如何取拾?本文認可先就執行調查的範圍與行使調查的限制做界定,再就執行調查行為應踐行何種正當行政程序為檢驗,提供實務運作之參考。行政執行除了聲明異議的救濟途徑外,執行措施僅得與本案救濟一併提起,常常緩不濟急,本文認為若能將對人民的保障提前至行政程序中,就執行機關所為之調查行為種類做區分,依現行政訴訟種類,給予人民適時之救濟。本文擬從公法上金錢給付義務執行之基本法律關係整理做為研究之基礎,接著切入主題探討公法上金錢給付義務執行之調查,就其意義、規範基礎及權利衝突探討,以釐清其行使界限與限制為何?再就調查行為的種類、行使程序及可能的救濟途徑為整理、探討,希冀能提供實務運作之參考。關鍵字:行政執行、行政程序、行政調查、行政強制執行、行政救濟、聲明異議、訴訟權保障 The Study on Administrative Investigation of Administrative Enforcement in the Monetary Payment of Public LawAdvisor(s): Dr.(Professor) Chen, Jheng-GenStudent: Chen, Shu- FenInstitute of Law(graduate school)National University of KaohsiungAbstractThe duty in the monetary payment of public law whether it does be realized, that will be consummated a matter of state finance, society, health, welfare or not. The social order is maintained and the public interest is promoted according to the realized duty. Administrative enforcement is higher of public welfare than civil enforcement, that is not allows to doubt. The administrative enforcement infringes the wills of litigant, using the compelling force pressed an obligor to fulfill its duty in the monetary payment of public law. How does the executive organ observe proper limits of the legal authorization? So as to achieve and ensure the national creditor's rights realization of administrative goal, that gave consideration to maintain the rights and interests of people, and made the win situation both. It must to wear by the unceasing practice operation and theory revision. The investigation of administrative execution had many diverse types that could not mostly be separated from the goal to establish the scope of the obligor’s property. That had when the organ of administrative execution investigates to the
館藏
  • 2 筆 • 頁數 1 •
 
310001797540 博碩士論文區(二樓) 不外借資料 學位論文 008M/0019 380101 7534 2009 一般使用(Normal) 在架 0
310001797557 博碩士論文區(二樓) 不外借資料 學位論文 008M/0019 380101 7534 2009 c.2 一般使用(Normal) 在架 0
  • 2 筆 • 頁數 1 •
評論
Export
取書館別
 
 
變更密碼
登入