國立高雄大學圖資館 |

登入

回首頁

Constraints on the generation of referring expressions, with special reference to Hindi.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Constraints on the generation of referring expressions, with special reference to Hindi.
作者:	Prasad, Rashmi.
面頁冊數:	147 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-04, Section: A, page: 1238.
附註:	Supervisor: Ellen F. Prince.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International64-04A.
標題:	Language, Linguistics.
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3087452
ISBN:	0496352229

Constraints on the generation of referring expressions, with special reference to Hindi.
Prasad, Rashmi.

Constraints on the generation of referring expressions, with special reference to Hindi. [electronic resource] - 147 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-04, Section: A, page: 1238.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Pennsylvania, 2003.

This dissertation makes a progress towards the generation of referring expressions in Hindi. We first make a proposal to exploit a combination of Gricean implicatures (Grice, 1975) and Centering theory constraints (Grosz et al., 1995) to formulate a generation algorithm for referring expressions whose domain of application is defined in terms of the Centering Transitions. The formulated algorithm is an abstraction over the cross-linguistic variability observed across languages. To set the language-specific parameters of the algorithm, in particular the parameter that decides the relative salience of the discourse entities in an utterance, we propose a corpus-based methodology to identify the ways in which discourse salience is realized linguistically in any language. We apply this method to a Hindi corpus to investigate three possible linguistic reflexes of discourse salience: grammatical role, word order, and information status, and show that Hindi does not display exhibit any correlation between discourse salience and either word order or information status, and that grammatical function emerges as the primary determinant of salience. Using the results of the proposed methodology for Hindi, we provide an analysis of Hindi zero pronouns. We argue that the constraints on the use of zeros in Hindi are neither syntactic (Kameyama, 1985) nor explicable purely in terms of the singular notion of the topic (Butt & King, 1997). Our analysis, provided in terms of Centering transition preferences, shows that pronouns can be dropped in Hindi only when they occur in an utterance following a CONTINUE or a SMOOTH-SHIFT transition, thus demonstrating the importance of the Preferred Center for zero pronoun realization. Finally, with respect to the problem of defining the utterance unit for discourse, we provide an analysis of complex sentences containing relative clauses. We argue that different kinds of relative clauses have different utterance statuses as well as different effects on the hierarchical organization of discourse segments. Non-restrictive relative clauses form a distinct but embedded utterance unit, while restrictives are part of the main clause unit. Our data also provide support for partitioning the class of restrictive relatives into indefinite head and definite head restrictives (Prince, 1990), with indefinite head restrictives patterning like non-restrictives.

ISBN: 0496352229Subjects--Topical Terms:

212724
Language, Linguistics.

Constraints on the generation of referring expressions, with special reference to Hindi.
LDR:03385nmm _2200253 _450 001 161932
005 20051017073353.5
008 230606s2003 eng d
020 $a 0496352229
035 $a 00148433
035 $a 161932
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 0 $a Prasad, Rashmi. $3 227027
245 1 0 $a Constraints on the generation of referring expressions, with special reference to Hindi. $h [electronic resource]
300 $a 147 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-04, Section: A, page: 1238.
500 $a Supervisor: Ellen F. Prince.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Pennsylvania, 2003.
520 # $a This dissertation makes a progress towards the generation of referring expressions in Hindi. We first make a proposal to exploit a combination of Gricean implicatures (Grice, 1975) and Centering theory constraints (Grosz et al., 1995) to formulate a generation algorithm for referring expressions whose domain of application is defined in terms of the Centering Transitions. The formulated algorithm is an abstraction over the cross-linguistic variability observed across languages. To set the language-specific parameters of the algorithm, in particular the parameter that decides the relative salience of the discourse entities in an utterance, we propose a corpus-based methodology to identify the ways in which discourse salience is realized linguistically in any language. We apply this method to a Hindi corpus to investigate three possible linguistic reflexes of discourse salience: grammatical role, word order, and information status, and show that Hindi does not display exhibit any correlation between discourse salience and either word order or information status, and that grammatical function emerges as the primary determinant of salience. Using the results of the proposed methodology for Hindi, we provide an analysis of Hindi zero pronouns. We argue that the constraints on the use of zeros in Hindi are neither syntactic (Kameyama, 1985) nor explicable purely in terms of the singular notion of the topic (Butt & King, 1997). Our analysis, provided in terms of Centering transition preferences, shows that pronouns can be dropped in Hindi only when they occur in an utterance following a CONTINUE or a SMOOTH-SHIFT transition, thus demonstrating the importance of the Preferred Center for zero pronoun realization. Finally, with respect to the problem of defining the utterance unit for discourse, we provide an analysis of complex sentences containing relative clauses. We argue that different kinds of relative clauses have different utterance statuses as well as different effects on the hierarchical organization of discourse segments. Non-restrictive relative clauses form a distinct but embedded utterance unit, while restrictives are part of the main clause unit. Our data also provide support for partitioning the class of restrictive relatives into indefinite head and definite head restrictives (Prince, 1990), with indefinite head restrictives patterning like non-restrictives.
590 $a School code: 0175.
650 # 0 $a Language, Linguistics. $3 212724
650 # 0 $a Computer Science. $3 212513
710 0 # $a University of Pennsylvania. $3 212781
773 0 # $g 64-04A. $t Dissertation Abstracts International
790 $a 0175
790 1 0 $a Prince, Ellen F., $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2003
856 4 0 $u http://libsw.nuk.edu.tw/login?url=http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3087452 $z http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3087452