語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
圖資館首頁
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Bargaining, uncertainty and property rights in North Atlantic fisheries
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Bargaining, uncertainty and property rights in North Atlantic fisheries
作者:
Alcock, Frank.
面頁冊數:
323 p.
附註:
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-12, Section: A, page: 4612.
附註:
Supervisor: Robert O. Keohane.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International64-12A.
標題:
Political Science, International Law and Relations.
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3114956
ISBN:
0496624458
Bargaining, uncertainty and property rights in North Atlantic fisheries
Alcock, Frank.
Bargaining, uncertainty and property rights in North Atlantic fisheries
[electronic resource] - 323 p.
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-12, Section: A, page: 4612.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Duke University, 2003.
Garrett Hardin's "tragedy of the commons" metaphor is commonly invoked to account for the unfortunate state of world fisheries. But the world's oceans are no longer a global commons and have not been so for the past two decades. Open-access regimes have persisted within many exclusive economic zones (EEZs) during this time, but coastal states' authority to regulate domestic fisheries has existed for more than a generation. Faced with the prospect of Hardin's tragedy, coastal states have had more than twenty years to devise institutional constraints that would prevent it. This dissertation asserts that the dismal experience with EEZs is in large part attributable to distributive bargaining problems that arose within coastal states in the wake of EEZ extension. More importantly, the dissertation argues that the interaction of actor heterogeneity and rule uncertainty can exacerbate these problems. The effects of these factors are reflected in crude forms of property rights that are often observed in the early stages of institutional design. Finally, the dissertation demonstrates how the variety of institutional designs and paths of institutional development that are observed in Iceland, Norway, Atlantic Canada and the New England region of the United States result from different configurations of political and economic structure within each case. Though the empirical discussion is focused upon property rights in fisheries, the theoretical discussion of bargaining under uncertainty has widespread application across comparative and international politics. The methodological approach adopted in this study uses an empirical puzzle and/or policy dilemma as a point of departure for theoretical abstraction. Abstraction allows for the specification of explicit, theoretically informed lines of reasoning that can be transformed into research hypotheses. These hypotheses are then operationalized and evaluated against empirical evidence. The evidence takes the form of government reports, public hearings documents, both public and internal industry documents and press reports, interview transcripts from secondary sources, and interviews and surveys conducted by the author. While some descriptive statistics are presented, the analysis is largely qualitative and presented in the form of a narrative.
ISBN: 0496624458Subjects--Topical Terms:
212542
Political Science, International Law and Relations.
Bargaining, uncertainty and property rights in North Atlantic fisheries
LDR
:03338nmm _2200289 _450
001
162326
005
20051017073434.5
008
230606s2003 eng d
020
$a
0496624458
035
$a
00148827
035
$a
162326
040
$a
UnM
$c
UnM
100
0
$a
Alcock, Frank.
$3
227456
245
1 0
$a
Bargaining, uncertainty and property rights in North Atlantic fisheries
$h
[electronic resource]
300
$a
323 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-12, Section: A, page: 4612.
500
$a
Supervisor: Robert O. Keohane.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Duke University, 2003.
520
#
$a
Garrett Hardin's "tragedy of the commons" metaphor is commonly invoked to account for the unfortunate state of world fisheries. But the world's oceans are no longer a global commons and have not been so for the past two decades. Open-access regimes have persisted within many exclusive economic zones (EEZs) during this time, but coastal states' authority to regulate domestic fisheries has existed for more than a generation. Faced with the prospect of Hardin's tragedy, coastal states have had more than twenty years to devise institutional constraints that would prevent it. This dissertation asserts that the dismal experience with EEZs is in large part attributable to distributive bargaining problems that arose within coastal states in the wake of EEZ extension. More importantly, the dissertation argues that the interaction of actor heterogeneity and rule uncertainty can exacerbate these problems. The effects of these factors are reflected in crude forms of property rights that are often observed in the early stages of institutional design. Finally, the dissertation demonstrates how the variety of institutional designs and paths of institutional development that are observed in Iceland, Norway, Atlantic Canada and the New England region of the United States result from different configurations of political and economic structure within each case. Though the empirical discussion is focused upon property rights in fisheries, the theoretical discussion of bargaining under uncertainty has widespread application across comparative and international politics. The methodological approach adopted in this study uses an empirical puzzle and/or policy dilemma as a point of departure for theoretical abstraction. Abstraction allows for the specification of explicit, theoretically informed lines of reasoning that can be transformed into research hypotheses. These hypotheses are then operationalized and evaluated against empirical evidence. The evidence takes the form of government reports, public hearings documents, both public and internal industry documents and press reports, interview transcripts from secondary sources, and interviews and surveys conducted by the author. While some descriptive statistics are presented, the analysis is largely qualitative and presented in the form of a narrative.
590
$a
School code: 0066.
650
# 0
$a
Political Science, International Law and Relations.
$3
212542
650
# 0
$a
Political Science, General.
$3
212408
650
# 0
$a
Political Science, Public Administration.
$3
212444
690
$a
0615
690
$a
0616
690
$a
0617
710
0 #
$a
Duke University.
$3
226880
773
0 #
$g
64-12A.
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
790
$a
0066
790
1 0
$a
Keohane, Robert O.,
$e
advisor
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2003
856
4 0
$u
http://libsw.nuk.edu.tw/login?url=http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3114956
$z
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3114956
筆 0 讀者評論
全部
電子館藏
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
館藏地
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
000000000819
電子館藏
1圖書
學位論文
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
多媒體檔案
http://libsw.nuk.edu.tw/login?url=http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3114956
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館別
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入