國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Reconstructing American individualis...

Princeton University.

Reconstructing American individualism: Race and the ethics of citizenship.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Reconstructing American individualism: Race and the ethics of citizenship.
作者:	Turner, Jack, III.
面頁冊數:	188 p.
附註:	Adviser: Stephen Macedo.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-01, Section: A, page: 0335.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International68-01A.
標題:	American Studies.
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3250038

Reconstructing American individualism: Race and the ethics of citizenship.
Turner, Jack, III.

Reconstructing American individualism: Race and the ethics of citizenship. - 188 p.

Adviser: Stephen Macedo.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Princeton University, 2006.

What is the proper orientation of democratic citizens toward racial injustice? How should Americans respond to the historical legacies of slavery and Jim Crow and the persistence of racial inequality? This dissertation addresses these questions through an immanent critique of American individualism. The central tenet of American individualism is that the success or failure of an individual is his or her responsibility, and his or hers alone. Historically, American individualism has been hostile to government efforts to reconstruct American democracy along racially egalitarian lines. Individualists tend to underestimate the constraining effects of history and social structure on freedom; they also deny that individuals are morally responsible for the legacies of past injustice or for impersonal social forces. These qualities of American individualism make it unfriendly to the quest to overcome the social structural elements of racial injustice. Yet through a fresh interpretation of four American individualists who confronted the racial injustice of their time---Ralph Waldo Emerson, Henry David Thoreau, Ralph Ellison, and James Baldwin---I show that there is an alternative tradition of American individualism which encourages citizens to take responsibility for structural injustice and to act politically against it. If individuals are interested in being self-reliant, this alternative tradition suggests, they must acknowledge their complicity in structural injustice and work to overcome that complicity. Evaluating the promise of this alternative tradition for the contemporary struggle for racial justice, I also engage Alexis de Tocqueville, Martin Luther King, Jr., John Rawls, and Judith Shklar.Subjects--Topical Terms:

212409
American Studies.

Reconstructing American individualism: Race and the ethics of citizenship.
LDR:02685nmm _2200277 _450 001 180723
005 20080111103829.5
008 090528s2006 eng d
035 $a 00311749
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 0 $a Turner, Jack, III. $3 264304
245 1 0 $a Reconstructing American individualism: Race and the ethics of citizenship.
300 $a 188 p.
500 $a Adviser: Stephen Macedo.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-01, Section: A, page: 0335.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Princeton University, 2006.
520 # $a What is the proper orientation of democratic citizens toward racial injustice? How should Americans respond to the historical legacies of slavery and Jim Crow and the persistence of racial inequality? This dissertation addresses these questions through an immanent critique of American individualism. The central tenet of American individualism is that the success or failure of an individual is his or her responsibility, and his or hers alone. Historically, American individualism has been hostile to government efforts to reconstruct American democracy along racially egalitarian lines. Individualists tend to underestimate the constraining effects of history and social structure on freedom; they also deny that individuals are morally responsible for the legacies of past injustice or for impersonal social forces. These qualities of American individualism make it unfriendly to the quest to overcome the social structural elements of racial injustice. Yet through a fresh interpretation of four American individualists who confronted the racial injustice of their time---Ralph Waldo Emerson, Henry David Thoreau, Ralph Ellison, and James Baldwin---I show that there is an alternative tradition of American individualism which encourages citizens to take responsibility for structural injustice and to act politically against it. If individuals are interested in being self-reliant, this alternative tradition suggests, they must acknowledge their complicity in structural injustice and work to overcome that complicity. Evaluating the promise of this alternative tradition for the contemporary struggle for racial justice, I also engage Alexis de Tocqueville, Martin Luther King, Jr., John Rawls, and Judith Shklar.
590 $a School code: 0181.
650 # 0 $a American Studies. $3 212409
650 # 0 $a Philosophy. $3 176573
650 # 0 $a Political Science, General. $3 212408
650 # 0 $a Sociology, Ethnic and Racial Studies. $3 212447
690 $a 0323
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0631
710 0 # $a Princeton University. $3 212488
773 0 # $g 68-01A. $t Dissertation Abstracts International
790 $a 0181
790 1 0 $a Macedo, Stephen, $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2006
856 4 0 $u http://libsw.nuk.edu.tw:81/login?url=http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3250038 $z http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3250038