國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Tough talk, cheap talk, and babbling...

Duke University.

Tough talk, cheap talk, and babbling: Government unity, hawkishness and military challenges.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Tough talk, cheap talk, and babbling: Government unity, hawkishness and military challenges.
作者:	Fehrs, Matthew Blake.
面頁冊數:	481 p.
附註:	Adviser: Joseph Grieco.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 69-10, Section: A, page: .
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International69-10A.
標題:	Political Science, General.
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3330829
ISBN:	9780549869962

Tough talk, cheap talk, and babbling: Government unity, hawkishness and military challenges.
Fehrs, Matthew Blake.

Tough talk, cheap talk, and babbling: Government unity, hawkishness and military challenges. - 481 p.

Adviser: Joseph Grieco.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Duke University, 2008.

A number of puzzles exist regarding the role of domestic politics in the likelihood of international conflict. In particular, the sources of incomplete information remain under-theorized and the microfoundations deficient. This study will examine the role that the unity of the government and the views of the government towards the use of force play in the targeting of states. The theory presented argues that divided dovish governments are particularly likely to suffer from military challenges. In particular, divided governments have difficulty signaling their intentions, taking decisive action, and may appear weak. The theory will be tested on a new dataset created by the author that examines the theory in the context of international territorial disputes. A number of significant findings emerge from the data. First, divided governments are significantly more likely to face challenges and increasing government unity markedly decreases the likelihood of a challenge. Second, unified hawkish governments were far less likely to be the targets of challenges than divided dovish governments. Finally, the substantive impact of key variables was much greater than that of the control variables. The causal process postulated in the theory is examined in eight case studies, two for each of the four government types. These case studies show that government type not only impacts the signaling of democratic states but also influences the perceptions of potential challengers.

ISBN: 9780549869962Subjects--Topical Terms:

212408
Political Science, General.

Tough talk, cheap talk, and babbling: Government unity, hawkishness and military challenges.
LDR:02601nam _2200313 _450 001 206958
005 20090413130314.5
008 090730s2008 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780549869962
035 $a 00372170
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 $a Fehrs, Matthew Blake. $3 321896
245 1 0 $a Tough talk, cheap talk, and babbling: Government unity, hawkishness and military challenges.
300 $a 481 p.
500 $a Adviser: Joseph Grieco.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 69-10, Section: A, page: .
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Duke University, 2008.
520 $a A number of puzzles exist regarding the role of domestic politics in the likelihood of international conflict. In particular, the sources of incomplete information remain under-theorized and the microfoundations deficient. This study will examine the role that the unity of the government and the views of the government towards the use of force play in the targeting of states. The theory presented argues that divided dovish governments are particularly likely to suffer from military challenges. In particular, divided governments have difficulty signaling their intentions, taking decisive action, and may appear weak. The theory will be tested on a new dataset created by the author that examines the theory in the context of international territorial disputes. A number of significant findings emerge from the data. First, divided governments are significantly more likely to face challenges and increasing government unity markedly decreases the likelihood of a challenge. Second, unified hawkish governments were far less likely to be the targets of challenges than divided dovish governments. Finally, the substantive impact of key variables was much greater than that of the control variables. The causal process postulated in the theory is examined in eight case studies, two for each of the four government types. These case studies show that government type not only impacts the signaling of democratic states but also influences the perceptions of potential challengers.
590 $a School code: 0066.
650 $a Political Science, General. $3 212408
650 $a Political Science, International Law and Relations. $3 212542
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0616
710 $a Duke University. $b Political Science. $3 321895
773 0 $g 69-10A. $t Dissertation Abstracts International
790 $a 0066
790 1 0 $a Downes, Alexander $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Feaver, Peter $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Gelpi, Chris $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Grieco, Joseph, $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Wibbels, Erik $e committee member
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2008
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3330829 $z http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3330829