國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

剩餘財產分配請求權之相關問題研究 = Study of Issues o...

國立高雄大學法律學系碩士班

剩餘財產分配請求權之相關問題研究 = Study of Issues of the Right to Claim for Distribution of Marital Property

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : 單行本
並列題名:	Study of Issues of the Right to Claim for Distribution of Marital Property
作者:	蔡佩珊,
其他團體作者:	國立高雄大學
出版地:	[高雄市]
出版者:	撰者;
出版年:	2009[民98]
面頁冊數:	145面圖、表 : 30公分;
標題:	剩餘財產分配請求權
標題:	claim for distribution of marital property
電子資源:	http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/49817991320815134203
附註:	指導教授：林秀雄博士
附註:	參考書目：面129-135
摘要註:	本論文主要探討我國民法親屬編於1985年修正時新增第1030條之1剩餘財產分配請求權，其新增理由乃認為夫在外工作或經營企業，妻在家操持家務，教養子女，倍極辛勞，使夫得無內顧之憂，專心發展事業，其因此所增加財產，除因繼承或其他無償取得者外，妻自應有平均分配之權利，反之，夫妻易地而處，亦然。此一明文可謂係家事勞動評價之肯認。因此本文遂於第二章家事勞動之評價探討於日本已論爭久許之家事勞動是否應予評價，若屬肯定，其評價基準為何，其主張之依據為何。且我國除新增第1030條之1剩餘財產分配請求權乃為家事有價肯認之明文規定外，是否仍有其他規定，均於本章有所論述。並於第三章以降提出與剩餘財產分配請求權相關問題為一粗淺之分析及研究。剩餘財產分配請求權於1985年新增以來，關於其性質於2002年增定第1030條之1第3項，引起學界強烈之批判並使產生相關制度之設計形同虛設，遂於2007年又將之刪除，回歸共識。再者，依據第1030條之1第1項之規定，可知剩餘財產分配請求權之產生乃係「法定財產關係消滅時」，而所謂「法定財產關係消滅時」包含之情形除離婚、婚姻撤銷、改用其他財產制、夫妻一方死亡、法律擬制婚姻關係解消，是否包婚姻無效，而夫妻一方死亡是否有其要件限制。此為本文第三章討論之重點。剩餘財產之計算基準涉及婚後財產之認定，而我國夫妻財產制於1985年及2002年均有相關規定之變動，對此剩餘財產範圍之認定將有所區分，而司法院大法官第410號解釋到第620號解釋亦就此提出其對「婚後財產」之認定，此見解之提出對我剩餘財產分配請求權之適用不可謂無衝擊性。1985年新增民法第1030條之1之規定過於簡略，欠缺相關配套措施，使得剩餘財產分配請求權之規定難以落實，因此2002年修正夫妻財產制時，乃對剩餘財產分配請求權之確保增訂相關之規定，使剩餘財產分配請求權人之權利實現獲得更周延的保障。 This paper mainly aims at right to claim for distribution of marital property in Article 1030-1 in Family of Civil Code amended in 1985. The reason of addition is wives shall have the right for equal distribution of added property of husbands making the living except for inheritance or acquisition without consideration, as wives also work hard to run the families and raise children. Or vice versa, husbands may request for the same from the wives. This article is an approval of labor of housework. In the second chapter of this paper, the researcher discusses the issue of whether labor in housework shall be evaluated that have been discussed for a long time in Japan. If yes, what are the criteria? In addition to right to claim for distribution of marital property in Article 1030-1, are there other requirements about values of housework in other laws and regulations in Taiwan? Basic analysis is given in Chapter 3 and later chapters on issues of right to claim remainder of property.After addition of claim for distribution of marital property in 1985, the nature in Paragraph 3, Article 1030-1 in 2002 caused strong criticism of scholars that the system were not being used. Therefore, the nature was deleted in 2007 for common consensus. In accordance with Paragraph 1, Article 1030-1, the termination of legal marital property includes divorce, marriage cancellation, use of other property system, and death of either husband or wife. Chapter 3 will discuss whether it includes marriage nullity and whether there are limitations of death of either husband or wife.Calculation of distribution of marital property involves system of the property acquired in marriage. There were changes on marital property regime in Taiwan in 1985 and 2002. Identification of such property is divided. No. 410 through No. 620 of The Justices of the Constitutional Court on Interpretation of the Constitution also gave identification on the property acquired in marriage. Such interpretations indeed had impact on claim for distribution of marital property.Addition to of Paragraph 1, Article 1030 in 1985 is too simple without relevant measures, making it difficult to implement claim for distribution of marital property. Therefore, in revision of marital property regime in 2002, regulations were added to protect the rights of people claiming for distribution of marital property. Keywords: housekeeping evaluation, claim for distribution of marital property, marital relation in continuance, property under disposal, recovering.

剩餘財產分配請求權之相關問題研究 = Study of Issues of the Right to Claim for Distribution of Marital Property
蔡, 佩珊

剩餘財產分配請求權之相關問題研究 = Study of Issues of the Right to Claim for Distribution of Marital Property / 蔡佩珊撰 - [高雄市] : 撰者, 2009[民98]. - 145面 ; 圖、表 ; 30公分.
指導教授：林秀雄博士參考書目：面129-135.
剩餘財產分配請求權claim for distribution of marital property

剩餘財產分配請求權之相關問題研究 = Study of Issues of the Right to Claim for Distribution of Marital Property
LDR:05993nam0a2200277 450 001 220317
005 20201102114339.0
009 220317
010 0 $b 精裝
010 0 $b 平裝
100 $a 20091020y2009 k y0chiy09 e
101 1 $a chi $d chi
102 $a tw
105 $a ak am 000yy
200 1 $a 剩餘財產分配請求權之相關問題研究 $d Study of Issues of the Right to Claim for Distribution of Marital Property $z eng $f 蔡佩珊撰
210 $a [高雄市] $c 撰者 $d 2009[民98]
215 0 $a 145面 $c 圖、表 $d 30公分
300 $a 指導教授：林秀雄博士
300 $a 參考書目：面129-135
328 $a 碩士論文--國立高雄大學法律學系碩士班
330 $a 本論文主要探討我國民法親屬編於1985年修正時新增第1030條之1剩餘財產分配請求權，其新增理由乃認為夫在外工作或經營企業，妻在家操持家務，教養子女，倍極辛勞，使夫得無內顧之憂，專心發展事業，其因此所增加財產，除因繼承或其他無償取得者外，妻自應有平均分配之權利，反之，夫妻易地而處，亦然。此一明文可謂係家事勞動評價之肯認。因此本文遂於第二章家事勞動之評價探討於日本已論爭久許之家事勞動是否應予評價，若屬肯定，其評價基準為何，其主張之依據為何。且我國除新增第1030條之1剩餘財產分配請求權乃為家事有價肯認之明文規定外，是否仍有其他規定，均於本章有所論述。並於第三章以降提出與剩餘財產分配請求權相關問題為一粗淺之分析及研究。剩餘財產分配請求權於1985年新增以來，關於其性質於2002年增定第1030條之1第3項，引起學界強烈之批判並使產生相關制度之設計形同虛設，遂於2007年又將之刪除，回歸共識。再者，依據第1030條之1第1項之規定，可知剩餘財產分配請求權之產生乃係「法定財產關係消滅時」，而所謂「法定財產關係消滅時」包含之情形除離婚、婚姻撤銷、改用其他財產制、夫妻一方死亡、法律擬制婚姻關係解消，是否包婚姻無效，而夫妻一方死亡是否有其要件限制。此為本文第三章討論之重點。剩餘財產之計算基準涉及婚後財產之認定，而我國夫妻財產制於1985年及2002年均有相關規定之變動，對此剩餘財產範圍之認定將有所區分，而司法院大法官第410號解釋到第620號解釋亦就此提出其對「婚後財產」之認定，此見解之提出對我剩餘財產分配請求權之適用不可謂無衝擊性。1985年新增民法第1030條之1之規定過於簡略，欠缺相關配套措施，使得剩餘財產分配請求權之規定難以落實，因此2002年修正夫妻財產制時，乃對剩餘財產分配請求權之確保增訂相關之規定，使剩餘財產分配請求權人之權利實現獲得更周延的保障。 This paper mainly aims at right to claim for distribution of marital property in Article 1030-1 in Family of Civil Code amended in 1985. The reason of addition is wives shall have the right for equal distribution of added property of husbands making the living except for inheritance or acquisition without consideration, as wives also work hard to run the families and raise children. Or vice versa, husbands may request for the same from the wives. This article is an approval of labor of housework. In the second chapter of this paper, the researcher discusses the issue of whether labor in housework shall be evaluated that have been discussed for a long time in Japan. If yes, what are the criteria? In addition to right to claim for distribution of marital property in Article 1030-1, are there other requirements about values of housework in other laws and regulations in Taiwan? Basic analysis is given in Chapter 3 and later chapters on issues of right to claim remainder of property.After addition of claim for distribution of marital property in 1985, the nature in Paragraph 3, Article 1030-1 in 2002 caused strong criticism of scholars that the system were not being used. Therefore, the nature was deleted in 2007 for common consensus. In accordance with Paragraph 1, Article 1030-1, the termination of legal marital property includes divorce, marriage cancellation, use of other property system, and death of either husband or wife. Chapter 3 will discuss whether it includes marriage nullity and whether there are limitations of death of either husband or wife.Calculation of distribution of marital property involves system of the property acquired in marriage. There were changes on marital property regime in Taiwan in 1985 and 2002. Identification of such property is divided. No. 410 through No. 620 of The Justices of the Constitutional Court on Interpretation of the Constitution also gave identification on the property acquired in marriage. Such interpretations indeed had impact on claim for distribution of marital property.Addition to of Paragraph 1, Article 1030 in 1985 is too simple without relevant measures, making it difficult to implement claim for distribution of marital property. Therefore, in revision of marital property regime in 2002, regulations were added to protect the rights of people claiming for distribution of marital property. Keywords: housekeeping evaluation, claim for distribution of marital property, marital relation in continuance, property under disposal, recovering.
510 1 $a Study of Issues of the Right to Claim for Distribution of Marital Property $z eng
610 0 $a 剩餘財產分配請求權 $a 婚姻關係存續中 $a 家事勞動評價 $a 自由處分金 $a 追回
610 1 $a claim for distribution of marital property $a housekeeping evaluation $a marital relation in continuance $a property under disposal $a recovering
681 $a 008M/0019 $b 380101 4421.1 $v 2007年版
700 1 $a 蔡 $b 佩珊 $4 撰 $3 66051
712 0 2 $a 國立高雄大學 $b 法律學系碩士班 $3 166036
801 0 $a tw $b 國立高雄大學 $c 20091020 $g CCR
856 7 $2 http $u http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/49817991320815134203