國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Immigration and justice.

Lister, Matthew James.

Immigration and justice.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Immigration and justice.
作者:	Lister, Matthew James.
面頁冊數:	275 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 70-06, Section: A, page: 2063.
附註:	Adviser: Samuel Freeman.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International70-06A.
標題:	Law.
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3363565
ISBN:	9781109235883

Immigration and justice.
Lister, Matthew James.

Immigration and justice. - 275 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 70-06, Section: A, page: 2063.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Pennsylvania, 2009.

In my dissertation I give a comprehensive account of the moral limits on immigration policy. Since setting terms of membership and inclusion within the state is generally considered one of the prime marks of sovereignty, this investigation also helps map some of the limits of state sovereignty. The project is situated within a "modest cosmopolitan" framework. In the first section I investigate whether there is a basic right to free movement between states and conclude that there is not. However, as people often have an interest in moving between states, some justification must be given for immigration restrictions. I locate the interest states or societies have in setting their own immigration policies in the good of political self-determination. This good allows states to have significant discretion in setting their own immigration policies, but does not give them complete discretion. Exploring the limits of this discretion make up the remainder of the work. I first consider a special group, those who need protection from the international community and can only be protected by granting them refuge in a safe country, and argue that this group is best categorized by a wide reading of the traditional UNHCR refugee definition. After detailing what is owed to refugees, so construed, I turn to the case of the family, arguing that all societies must, as a matter of justice, allow current members to bring in non-citizen immediate family members. Importantly, this right is held by current members against their own society and not by would-be immigrants. I next turn to the question of guest-worker programs and show how a suitably crafted program may be made compatible with liberal principles of justice and explain why such programs likely will have a place in liberal immigration policies. In the final chapter I describe the limits justice places on citizenship and naturalization policies. I conclude with a "plea" for societies to adopt liberal immigration policies.

ISBN: 9781109235883Subjects--Topical Terms:

207600
Law.

Immigration and justice.
LDR:02850nmm 2200289 4500 001 240223
005 20100310090825.5
008 100410s2009 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781109235883
035 $a (UMI)AAI3363565
035 $a AAI3363565
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Lister, Matthew James. $3 384249
245 1 0 $a Immigration and justice.
300 $a 275 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 70-06, Section: A, page: 2063.
500 $a Adviser: Samuel Freeman.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Pennsylvania, 2009.
520 $a In my dissertation I give a comprehensive account of the moral limits on immigration policy. Since setting terms of membership and inclusion within the state is generally considered one of the prime marks of sovereignty, this investigation also helps map some of the limits of state sovereignty. The project is situated within a "modest cosmopolitan" framework. In the first section I investigate whether there is a basic right to free movement between states and conclude that there is not. However, as people often have an interest in moving between states, some justification must be given for immigration restrictions. I locate the interest states or societies have in setting their own immigration policies in the good of political self-determination. This good allows states to have significant discretion in setting their own immigration policies, but does not give them complete discretion. Exploring the limits of this discretion make up the remainder of the work. I first consider a special group, those who need protection from the international community and can only be protected by granting them refuge in a safe country, and argue that this group is best categorized by a wide reading of the traditional UNHCR refugee definition. After detailing what is owed to refugees, so construed, I turn to the case of the family, arguing that all societies must, as a matter of justice, allow current members to bring in non-citizen immediate family members. Importantly, this right is held by current members against their own society and not by would-be immigrants. I next turn to the question of guest-worker programs and show how a suitably crafted program may be made compatible with liberal principles of justice and explain why such programs likely will have a place in liberal immigration policies. In the final chapter I describe the limits justice places on citizenship and naturalization policies. I conclude with a "plea" for societies to adopt liberal immigration policies.
590 $a School code: 0175.
650 4 $a Law. $3 207600
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 176573
650 4 $a Political Science, International Law and Relations. $3 212542
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0616
710 2 $a University of Pennsylvania. $3 212781
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 70-06A.
790 1 0 $a Freeman, Samuel, $e advisor
790 $a 0175
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2009
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3363565