國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Iron fists in silk gloves: Building ...

Harvard University.

Iron fists in silk gloves: Building political regimes in the Middle East.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Iron fists in silk gloves: Building political regimes in the Middle East.
作者:	Yom, Sean Lee.
面頁冊數:	370 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 70-07, Section: A, page: 2718.
附註:	Adviser: Grzegorz Ekiert.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International70-07A.
標題:	History, Middle Eastern.
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3365490
ISBN:	9781109257694

Iron fists in silk gloves: Building political regimes in the Middle East.
Yom, Sean Lee.

Iron fists in silk gloves: Building political regimes in the Middle East. - 370 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 70-07, Section: A, page: 2718.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Harvard University, 2009.

After predicting a wave of Middle East democratization that never happened, comparative scholars now face hard questions about the resilience of authoritarianism in this region. Among the most demanding puzzles is why, during the post-colonial era, autocratic states in the Middle East have exhibited such starkly different patterns of durability and contestation. Some incumbents enjoyed perennial stability even during economic and institutional crises, such as the al-Sabah dynasty of Kuwait; other sovereigns stumbled through periodic conflicts with mobilized opposition and retained only a tenuous grasp on power, such as the Hashemite monarchy of Jordan; and still other dictators led states that collapsed due to revolutionary unrest, such as the Pahlavi regime of Iran. What accounts for such contrasting outcomes? My dissertation answers this question by comparing historical sequences of late development, focusing on how international political forces influenced domestic coalitional alignments in the early stages of state-building in these aforementioned cases.

ISBN: 9781109257694Subjects--Topical Terms:

227352
History, Middle Eastern.

Iron fists in silk gloves: Building political regimes in the Middle East.
LDR:03404nmm 2200301 4500 001 240252
005 20100310090832.5
008 100410s2009 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781109257694
035 $a (UMI)AAI3365490
035 $a AAI3365490
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Yom, Sean Lee. $3 384279
245 1 0 $a Iron fists in silk gloves: Building political regimes in the Middle East.
300 $a 370 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 70-07, Section: A, page: 2718.
500 $a Adviser: Grzegorz Ekiert.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Harvard University, 2009.
520 $a After predicting a wave of Middle East democratization that never happened, comparative scholars now face hard questions about the resilience of authoritarianism in this region. Among the most demanding puzzles is why, during the post-colonial era, autocratic states in the Middle East have exhibited such starkly different patterns of durability and contestation. Some incumbents enjoyed perennial stability even during economic and institutional crises, such as the al-Sabah dynasty of Kuwait; other sovereigns stumbled through periodic conflicts with mobilized opposition and retained only a tenuous grasp on power, such as the Hashemite monarchy of Jordan; and still other dictators led states that collapsed due to revolutionary unrest, such as the Pahlavi regime of Iran. What accounts for such contrasting outcomes? My dissertation answers this question by comparing historical sequences of late development, focusing on how international political forces influenced domestic coalitional alignments in the early stages of state-building in these aforementioned cases.
520 $a Combining insights from fieldwork with careful historical research, I argue the depth of geopolitical support that founding rulers secured from foreign patrons early on shaped the popular coalitions they later built to anchor state power, and that the breadth of these coalitional bases ultimately determined long-term pathways of stability and development. In Kuwait, weak British assistance in the early twentieth century prevented rulers from crushing organized resistance and bolstering their fiscal and coercive autonomy. This standoff forced the regime to incorporate opposing social forces into a broad, inclusionary coalition whose institutional bargains would guarantee future populist support. In Jordan, modest American patronage commencing in the late 1950s enabled the state to stifle opposition parties but not amplify the financial and repressive capacities central to its vision of new order. This compelled the regime to cultivate a selective coalition around its tribal minority, a discriminatory strategy that sparked recurrent but manageable conflict. In Iran, almost unlimited US assistance starting in the early 1950s empowered leadership to smash its nationalist rivals and reinvigorate its fiscal and military bases. This victory resulted in the adoption of a narrow, exclusionary coalition reliant upon state elites and mass repression, thereby facilitating future revolutionary unrest.
590 $a School code: 0084.
650 4 $a History, Middle Eastern. $3 227352
650 4 $a Political Science, International Law and Relations. $3 212542
650 4 $a Sociology, Organizational. $3 264288
690 $a 0333
690 $a 0616
690 $a 0703
710 2 $a Harvard University. $3 212445
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 70-07A.
790 1 0 $a Ekiert, Grzegorz, $e advisor
790 $a 0084
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2009
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3365490