國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Shaping human rights policy in liber...

Princeton University.

Shaping human rights policy in liberal democracies: Assessing and explaining compliance with the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Shaping human rights policy in liberal democracies: Assessing and explaining compliance with the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights.
作者:	von Staden, Andreas.
面頁冊數:	446 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 70-12, Section: A, page: .
附註:	Adviser: Anne-Marie Slaughter.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International70-12A.
標題:	Political Science, International Law and Relations.
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3388078
ISBN:	9781109523935

Shaping human rights policy in liberal democracies: Assessing and explaining compliance with the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights.
von Staden, Andreas.

Shaping human rights policy in liberal democracies: Assessing and explaining compliance with the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights. - 446 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 70-12, Section: A, page: .

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Princeton University, 2009.

The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), the judicial body created to adjudicate disputes under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), is frequently identified as one of the most successful transnational judicial institutions in existence today whose judgments are said to be habitually complied with by respondent states. The dissertation investigates this claim and, more specifically, probes the extent to which there is variation in the scope and depth of compliance by mature liberal democracies, and how such variation may be best explained.

ISBN: 9781109523935Subjects--Topical Terms:

212542
Political Science, International Law and Relations.

Shaping human rights policy in liberal democracies: Assessing and explaining compliance with the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights.
LDR:03383nmm 2200289 4500 001 240329
005 20100310090850.5
008 100410s2009 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781109523935
035 $a (UMI)AAI3388078
035 $a AAI3388078
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a von Staden, Andreas. $3 384365
245 1 0 $a Shaping human rights policy in liberal democracies: Assessing and explaining compliance with the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights.
300 $a 446 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 70-12, Section: A, page: .
500 $a Adviser: Anne-Marie Slaughter.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Princeton University, 2009.
520 $a The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), the judicial body created to adjudicate disputes under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), is frequently identified as one of the most successful transnational judicial institutions in existence today whose judgments are said to be habitually complied with by respondent states. The dissertation investigates this claim and, more specifically, probes the extent to which there is variation in the scope and depth of compliance by mature liberal democracies, and how such variation may be best explained.
520 $a Based on a review of the social science and legal literature on compliance and the rationalist and constructivist schools of thought reflected in it, I pursue two central hypotheses: First, judgments by a duly constituted transnational court exert a normative compliance pull on liberal democracies so that their governments will in no case disregard adverse judgments rendered against them (the constructivist hypothesis). Second, to the extent, however, that either the formal Convention framework or any remaining interpretive spaces open up a spectrum of alternatives in the execution of an adverse judgment, governments will in most cases choose those alternatives that minimize---materially and normatively---the domestic impact of an adverse judgment (the rational choice hypothesis). The underlying expected preference is deduced from the fact that a government that pursues litigation to the very end cannot, under most circumstances, be assumed to be supportive of an adverse outcome.
520 $a After conducting a descriptive large-N analysis of the execution status of all judgments rendered until 2005 to provide a quantitative overview of the compliance situation, I test these hypotheses across several partly comprehensive, partly selective country case studies, including, inter alia, the United Kingdom, Germany, and Italy, and generally find support for my hypotheses: While there is no instance of sustained defiance of the Court among liberal democracies, despite the absence of meaningful coercion, impact-minimizing behavior is pervasive. Rather than detecting categorical differences in this fundamental type of behavior, variation between countries occurs mostly with respect to the substantive issues that arise before the ECtHR and the concomitant variation in the spectrum of reasonably available alternatives in judgment execution.
590 $a School code: 0181.
650 4 $a Political Science, International Law and Relations. $3 212542
690 $a 0616
710 2 $a Princeton University. $3 212488
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 70-12A.
790 1 0 $a Slaughter, Anne-Marie, $e advisor
790 $a 0181
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2009
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3388078