國立高雄大學圖資館 |

Language: English

Back

Microsoft於歐盟濫用市場優勢地位一案之研究 = A Study ...

國立高雄大學政治法律學系碩士班

Microsoft於歐盟濫用市場優勢地位一案之研究 = A Study on Abuses of Dominant Position: Force on the Microsoft Case in EU

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : monographic
Paralel Title:	A Study on Abuses of Dominant Position: Force on the Microsoft Case in EU
Author:	鄭嘉瑩,
Secondary Intellectual Responsibility:	國立高雄大學
Place of Publication:	[高雄市]
Published:	撰者;
Year of Publication:	民99[2010]
Description:	132面圖，表 : 30公分;
Subject:	互通性資訊
Subject:	dominant position
Online resource:	http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/15384668538122106769
Summary:	歐盟Microsoft一案之核心爭點，在於Microsoft是否藉著自身所擁有的高市場占有率優勢，以此帶領自身周邊產品的推廣，卻不對外公開在電腦作業系統與應用軟體間的「關於系統介面互通之授權資訊（簡稱互通性資訊）」，形成了藉著自身所擁有之優勢，而妨礙了市場自由競爭與開放。因此本論文將主要研究優勢地位（dominant position）以及互通性資訊與排斥性行為（exclusionary conduct）之關聯，更將會以Microsoft一案為核心，討論擁有優勢地位的電腦軟體，在保護自身軟體所享有的著作權同時，因拒絕開放系統介面互通之授權資訊，是否可能因其擁有的市場優勢地位，形同排斥與形成市場進入之障礙？對市場上競爭者而言，訴諸法律是否能得到較為公平的市場競爭機會?亦或法律所能達到的僅是一個微不足道的處罰，並無法實際影響市場的實際運作？本文將回顧與分析歐盟Microsoft案，由歐盟執委會（Commission）的調查報告到歐洲初審法院（The Court of First Instance）判決的整個歷程，並深入探討該兩大主題所涵蓋的問題，以及對過往案子所能帶來的省思。 In Microsoft Case, it mainly discussed ”interoperability information” in the Windows operating systems and abuse of market power. Microsoft keeps offering software including Windows Media Player in the Windows client PC operation system. EU Competition Law considers undertakings illegal tying、interoperability information abusing their dominant positions. Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the Union is the regulation to forbid the behavior. The paper will study of dominant position、interoperability information and exclusionary conduct . When the computer software with dominant position asks to open“ interoperability information”, how should we say it owns market power and establish on the threshold ?The first part will try to find the questions and reasons about dominant position in Microsoft case. The second one will review the case in order to make an opinion. This study will review and analyze Microsoft case from the investigative report of Commission to the verdict of The Court of First Instance, and discuss the questions which the main two parts include.

Microsoft於歐盟濫用市場優勢地位一案之研究 = A Study on Abuses of Dominant Position: Force on the Microsoft Case in EU
鄭, 嘉瑩

Microsoft於歐盟濫用市場優勢地位一案之研究 = A Study on Abuses of Dominant Position: Force on the Microsoft Case in EU / 鄭嘉瑩撰 - [高雄市] : 撰者, 民99[2010]. - 132面 ; 圖，表 ; 30公分.
參考書目：面.
互通性資訊dominant position

Microsoft於歐盟濫用市場優勢地位一案之研究 = A Study on Abuses of Dominant Position: Force on the Microsoft Case in EU
LDR:03548nam0a2200277 450 001 272861
005 20170214090235.0
009 272861
010 0 $b 精裝
010 0 $b 平裝
100 $a 20170214y2010 k y0chiy05 e
101 1 $a chi $d chi $d eng
102 $a tw
105 $a ak am 000yy
200 1 $a Microsoft於歐盟濫用市場優勢地位一案之研究 $d A Study on Abuses of Dominant Position: Force on the Microsoft Case in EU $f 鄭嘉瑩撰
210 $a [高雄市] $c 撰者 $d 民99[2010]
215 0 $a 132面 $c 圖，表 $d 30公分
314 $a 指導教授：紀振清、劉孔中博士
320 $a 參考書目：面
328 $a 碩士論文--國立高雄大學政治法律學系碩士班
330 $a 歐盟Microsoft一案之核心爭點，在於Microsoft是否藉著自身所擁有的高市場占有率優勢，以此帶領自身周邊產品的推廣，卻不對外公開在電腦作業系統與應用軟體間的「關於系統介面互通之授權資訊（簡稱互通性資訊）」，形成了藉著自身所擁有之優勢，而妨礙了市場自由競爭與開放。因此本論文將主要研究優勢地位（dominant position）以及互通性資訊與排斥性行為（exclusionary conduct）之關聯，更將會以Microsoft一案為核心，討論擁有優勢地位的電腦軟體，在保護自身軟體所享有的著作權同時，因拒絕開放系統介面互通之授權資訊，是否可能因其擁有的市場優勢地位，形同排斥與形成市場進入之障礙？對市場上競爭者而言，訴諸法律是否能得到較為公平的市場競爭機會?亦或法律所能達到的僅是一個微不足道的處罰，並無法實際影響市場的實際運作？本文將回顧與分析歐盟Microsoft案，由歐盟執委會（Commission）的調查報告到歐洲初審法院（The Court of First Instance）判決的整個歷程，並深入探討該兩大主題所涵蓋的問題，以及對過往案子所能帶來的省思。 In Microsoft Case, it mainly discussed ”interoperability information” in the Windows operating systems and abuse of market power. Microsoft keeps offering software including Windows Media Player in the Windows client PC operation system. EU Competition Law considers undertakings illegal tying、interoperability information abusing their dominant positions. Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the Union is the regulation to forbid the behavior. The paper will study of dominant position、interoperability information and exclusionary conduct . When the computer software with dominant position asks to open“ interoperability information”, how should we say it owns market power and establish on the threshold ?The first part will try to find the questions and reasons about dominant position in Microsoft case. The second one will review the case in order to make an opinion. This study will review and analyze Microsoft case from the investigative report of Commission to the verdict of The Court of First Instance, and discuss the questions which the main two parts include.
510 1 $a A Study on Abuses of Dominant Position: Force on the Microsoft Case in EU
610 0 $a 互通性資訊 $a 優勢地位 $a 著作權 $a 拒絕開放 $a Microsoft $a 歐盟 $a 歐盟執委會 $a 歐洲初審法院
610 1 $a dominant position $a EU $a interoperability information $a Article 102
681 $a 008M/0019 $b 382101 8749 $v 2007年版
700 1 $a 鄭 $b 嘉瑩 $4 撰 $3 483022
712 0 2 $a 國立高雄大學 $b 政治法律學系碩士班 $3 166052
801 0 $a tw $b 國立高雄大學 $c 20101228 $g CCR
856 7 $z 電子資源 $2 http $u http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/15384668538122106769