國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

如何在不同風險衡量指標下比較各投資組合的表現 = Comparison ...

國立高雄大學統計學研究所

如何在不同風險衡量指標下比較各投資組合的表現 = Comparison of Portfolio Performance under Different Risk Measures

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : 單行本
並列題名:	Comparison of Portfolio Performance under Different Risk Measures
作者:	林忻靈,
其他團體作者:	國立高雄大學
出版地:	[高雄市]
出版者:	撰者;
出版年:	民99[2010]
面頁冊數:	71面圖，表 : 30公分;
標題:	投資組合
標題:	Portfolio selection
電子資源:	http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/02467561824197542503
摘要註:	在投資組合的問題上，投資者大多是追求報酬越大越好、風險越小越好的投資組合；然而根據不同文章的作者，其考量的風險也不盡相同。投資者該如何去比較這些在不同風險衡量下的投資組合方法，從而選擇其適合的投資組合？本研究想要在不同的風險衡量之間以投資組合的角度來建立一個比較的基礎。本研究分為在景氣低迷、景氣穩定、景氣熱絡三種情況下去比較九種投資組合方法的風險，是根據各個投資組合方法的資產配置去計算每種方法對應其他投資組合方法的風險，再去比較在相同的風險衡量下九種方法的風險。根據模擬的結果顯示Sharpe ratio跟Sortino這兩種選擇投資組合方法的風險比起其他的方法來的高。 Investors are seeking the portfolio which has higher return and lower risk in the portfolio selection problem; however, different researchers consider different risk measures. How to compare these portfolio selection rules under different risk measures to choose a proper portfolio selection rule for different investors? The purpose of this research is that we want to establish a criterion to compare the portfolio selection rules under different risk measures.This research is to compare the risk of nine portfolio selection rules under the cases that are economic downturn, economic flat and economic upturn, and use the optimal portfolio weights for every portfolio selection rule to calculate the risk under other risk measures. Then we compare the risk of nine portfolio selection rules under the same risk measure. According to our simulation results, it seems that the Sharpe ratio and Sortino portfolio selection rules have higher risk than other portfolio selection rules.

如何在不同風險衡量指標下比較各投資組合的表現 = Comparison of Portfolio Performance under Different Risk Measures
林, 忻靈

如何在不同風險衡量指標下比較各投資組合的表現 = Comparison of Portfolio Performance under Different Risk Measures / 林忻靈撰 - [高雄市] : 撰者, 民99[2010]. - 71面 ; 圖，表 ; 30公分.
參考書目：面.
投資組合Portfolio selection

如何在不同風險衡量指標下比較各投資組合的表現 = Comparison of Portfolio Performance under Different Risk Measures
LDR:02846nam0a2200277 450 001 272935
005 20170214092729.0
009 272935
010 0 $b 精裝
010 0 $b 平裝
100 $a 20170214y2010 k y0chiy05 e
101 1 $a eng $d chi $d eng
102 $a tw
105 $a ak am 000yy
200 1 $a 如何在不同風險衡量指標下比較各投資組合的表現 $d Comparison of Portfolio Performance under Different Risk Measures $f 林忻靈撰
210 $a [高雄市] $c 撰者 $d 民99[2010]
215 0 $a 71面 $c 圖，表 $d 30公分
314 $a 指導教授：俞淑惠博士
320 $a 參考書目：面
328 $a 碩士論文--國立高雄大學統計學研究所
330 $a 在投資組合的問題上，投資者大多是追求報酬越大越好、風險越小越好的投資組合；然而根據不同文章的作者，其考量的風險也不盡相同。投資者該如何去比較這些在不同風險衡量下的投資組合方法，從而選擇其適合的投資組合？本研究想要在不同的風險衡量之間以投資組合的角度來建立一個比較的基礎。本研究分為在景氣低迷、景氣穩定、景氣熱絡三種情況下去比較九種投資組合方法的風險，是根據各個投資組合方法的資產配置去計算每種方法對應其他投資組合方法的風險，再去比較在相同的風險衡量下九種方法的風險。根據模擬的結果顯示Sharpe ratio跟Sortino這兩種選擇投資組合方法的風險比起其他的方法來的高。 Investors are seeking the portfolio which has higher return and lower risk in the portfolio selection problem; however, different researchers consider different risk measures. How to compare these portfolio selection rules under different risk measures to choose a proper portfolio selection rule for different investors? The purpose of this research is that we want to establish a criterion to compare the portfolio selection rules under different risk measures.This research is to compare the risk of nine portfolio selection rules under the cases that are economic downturn, economic flat and economic upturn, and use the optimal portfolio weights for every portfolio selection rule to calculate the risk under other risk measures. Then we compare the risk of nine portfolio selection rules under the same risk measure. According to our simulation results, it seems that the Sharpe ratio and Sortino portfolio selection rules have higher risk than other portfolio selection rules.
510 1 $a Comparison of Portfolio Performance under Different Risk Measures
610 0 $a 投資組合 $a 風險衡量
610 1 $a Portfolio selection $a Risk measure
681 $a 008M/0019 $b 343201 4491 $v 2007年版
700 1 $a 林 $b 忻靈 $4 撰 $3 483089
712 0 2 $a 國立高雄大學 $b 統計學研究所 $3 166081
801 0 $a tw $b 國立高雄大學 $c 20101228 $g CCR
856 7 $z 電子資源 $2 http $u http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/02467561824197542503