國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Technology assessment for Spaceship ...

Hancock, Randy.

Technology assessment for Spaceship Two, space tourism, and private spaceflight.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Technology assessment for Spaceship Two, space tourism, and private spaceflight.
作者:	Hancock, Randy.
面頁冊數:	234 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-02, Section: B, page: 1132.
附註:	Adviser: Anthony Gilberti.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International71-02B.
標題:	Business Administration, Management.
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3394728
ISBN:	9781109620498

Technology assessment for Spaceship Two, space tourism, and private spaceflight.
Hancock, Randy.

Technology assessment for Spaceship Two, space tourism, and private spaceflight. - 234 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-02, Section: B, page: 1132.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana State University, 2009.

A seven-step technology assessment was conducted to address questions regarding the significance and likely consequences associated with the introduction of Spaceship Two, space tourism, and private spaceflight. Impacts were assessed across four categories: the Role and Functions of Government, Private Industry Factors, Cultural and Societal Impacts, and the Time Frame in which these impacts were anticipated to occur. The technology assessment findings were compared to the results of expert interviews that addressed the sane four categories. The researcher noted that, while there was overwhelming agreement between the technology assessment's primary impacts and the expert interview responses, there were several differences. The technology assessment and interviewees agreed that the federal government would likely be both a regulator and user of private spaceflight. Both agreed that business partnerships would be key in pursuing private spaceflight. There was also consensus that, as market forces come to bear, ticket prices would drop and a larger market and broader passenger demographic would emerge. The technology assessment and experts agreed that an accident, especially one early in the industry's evolution, could be disastrous. Both agreed that private spaceflight can serve as a inspiration to students and be a positive influence in society, and both agreed that the start of passenger flights should take place in the 2010 - 2012 timeframe. Due to the potentially disastrous consequences of an accident, there was agreement between the technology assessment and experts on the value of flight and ground crew training, driven by insurance carriers and federal mandate. Most differences between the technology assessment's findings and the expert interview responses were due to omission, rather than direct disagreement. However, this was not the case in every instance. The most significant difference between the technology assessment and the experts involved the viability of point-to-point transport, where the technology assessment found that it is unlikely with current Spaceship technology. Perhaps one of the most notable findings from this research was that SpaceShip Two would likely serve as a milestone in achievement, and the technology's greatest impact could be that it may serve as an important stepping-stone on the path to further innovation.

ISBN: 9781109620498Subjects--Topical Terms:

212493
Business Administration, Management.

Technology assessment for Spaceship Two, space tourism, and private spaceflight.
LDR:03283nmm 2200277 4500 001 280776
005 20110119094951.5
008 110301s2009 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781109620498
035 $a (UMI)AAI3394728
035 $a AAI3394728
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Hancock, Randy. $3 492878
245 1 0 $a Technology assessment for Spaceship Two, space tourism, and private spaceflight.
300 $a 234 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-02, Section: B, page: 1132.
500 $a Adviser: Anthony Gilberti.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana State University, 2009.
520 $a A seven-step technology assessment was conducted to address questions regarding the significance and likely consequences associated with the introduction of Spaceship Two, space tourism, and private spaceflight. Impacts were assessed across four categories: the Role and Functions of Government, Private Industry Factors, Cultural and Societal Impacts, and the Time Frame in which these impacts were anticipated to occur. The technology assessment findings were compared to the results of expert interviews that addressed the sane four categories. The researcher noted that, while there was overwhelming agreement between the technology assessment's primary impacts and the expert interview responses, there were several differences. The technology assessment and interviewees agreed that the federal government would likely be both a regulator and user of private spaceflight. Both agreed that business partnerships would be key in pursuing private spaceflight. There was also consensus that, as market forces come to bear, ticket prices would drop and a larger market and broader passenger demographic would emerge. The technology assessment and experts agreed that an accident, especially one early in the industry's evolution, could be disastrous. Both agreed that private spaceflight can serve as a inspiration to students and be a positive influence in society, and both agreed that the start of passenger flights should take place in the 2010 - 2012 timeframe. Due to the potentially disastrous consequences of an accident, there was agreement between the technology assessment and experts on the value of flight and ground crew training, driven by insurance carriers and federal mandate. Most differences between the technology assessment's findings and the expert interview responses were due to omission, rather than direct disagreement. However, this was not the case in every instance. The most significant difference between the technology assessment and the experts involved the viability of point-to-point transport, where the technology assessment found that it is unlikely with current Spaceship technology. Perhaps one of the most notable findings from this research was that SpaceShip Two would likely serve as a milestone in achievement, and the technology's greatest impact could be that it may serve as an important stepping-stone on the path to further innovation.
590 $a School code: 0094.
650 4 $a Business Administration, Management. $3 212493
650 4 $a Engineering, Aerospace. $3 227946
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0538
710 2 $a Indiana State University. $3 492879
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 71-02B.
790 1 0 $a Gilberti, Anthony, $e advisor
790 $a 0094
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2009
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3394728