國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

環境稅、污染減量合作和社會福利 = Environmental Tax,...

國立高雄大學經營管理研究所

環境稅、污染減量合作和社會福利 = Environmental Tax, Pollution Abatement Cooperation, and Social Welfare

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : 單行本
並列題名:	Environmental Tax, Pollution Abatement Cooperation, and Social Welfare
作者:	陳葳,
其他團體作者:	國立高雄大學
出版地:	[高雄市]
出版者:	撰者;
出版年:	民100
面頁冊數:	54葉圖 : 30公分;
標題:	環境稅
標題:	Environmental Tax
電子資源:	http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/57496903524293021320
附註:	參考書目：葉45-48
附註:	內容為英文
其他題名:	環境稅污染減量合作和社會福利
摘要註:	本文建立一個三階段賽局模型，對生產過程中同時排放污染物的廠商，在政府對廠商課徵環境稅的政策措施下，分別就廠商不合作使用與合作使用污染減排設施，探討廠商的減排決策與社會福利效果。本文的主要發現如下：(1)不論廠商是否合作使用減排設施，廠商減排設施之投資與利潤及減排比例存在反向關係；環境稅與利潤呈反向關係，與減排比例呈正向關係。(2)不論廠商是否合作使用各自投資的減排設施，減排設施投資與社會福利呈正向關係；環境損害程度與社會福利呈反向關係。(3)廠商合作使用減排設施比不合作可以獲得更多的利潤與更高的減排比例；廠商合作使用減排設施的程度愈高，合作對不合作使用減排設施所造成之利潤差距與減排比例差距提高；如廠商減排設施之投資愈高，則合作對不合作使用減排設施所造成之利潤差距與減排比例差距將會降低。 When the two firms emit pollutants simultaneously and the government levies environmental tax on the polluting firms. This article constructs a three-stage game model to investigate firms’ pollution abatement policies and the social welfare effects under the cases of non-cooperation and cooperation respectively.Main findings of this article are as follows: (1) Whether the firms are pollution abatement facilities cooperatively or not, the change of firm’s investment in pollution abatement facilities has an inverse relation with the change of the profits of the firms and pollution abatement ratios; The change of environmental tax has an inverse relationship with the change of profit and a positive relationship with pollution abatement ratio. (2) Regardless of whether firms use pollution abatement facilities cooperatively or not, the change of pollution abatement investment has positive relationship with the change of social welfare; The change of degree of environmental damage has inverse relationship with the change of social welfare. (3) Cooperative use of pollution abatement facilities by firms lead to higher level of pollution abatement ratio and more profit than those in non-cooperative case; Higher degree of pollution abatement facilities usage by firms, leading to increase in the difference between profits and pollution abatement ratios under cooperative use of pollution abatement facilities and non-cooperation; Higher the investment in pollution abatement facilities, then the difference between profits and pollution abatement ratios under cooperation and non-cooperation decreases.

環境稅、污染減量合作和社會福利 = Environmental Tax, Pollution Abatement Cooperation, and Social Welfare
陳, 葳

環境稅、污染減量合作和社會福利 = Environmental Tax, Pollution Abatement Cooperation, and Social Welfare / 陳葳撰 - [高雄市] : 撰者, 民100. - 54葉 ; 圖 ; 30公分.
參考書目：葉45-48內容為英文.
環境稅Environmental Tax

環境稅、污染減量合作和社會福利 = Environmental Tax, Pollution Abatement Cooperation, and Social Welfare
LDR:03786nam0a2200301 450 001 300413
005 20170214101028.0
009 300413
010 0 $b 精裝
010 0 $b 平裝
100 $a 20170214y2011 m y0chiy50 e
101 1 $a eng $d chi $d eng
102 $a tw
105 $a a am 000yy
200 1 $a 環境稅、污染減量合作和社會福利 $d Environmental Tax, Pollution Abatement Cooperation, and Social Welfare $z eng $f 陳葳撰
210 $a [高雄市] $c 撰者 $d 民100
215 0 $a 54葉 $c 圖 $d 30公分
300 $a 參考書目：葉45-48
300 $a 內容為英文
314 $a 指導教授：鄭育仁博士
328 $a 碩士論文--國立高雄大學經營管理研究所
330 $a 本文建立一個三階段賽局模型，對生產過程中同時排放污染物的廠商，在政府對廠商課徵環境稅的政策措施下，分別就廠商不合作使用與合作使用污染減排設施，探討廠商的減排決策與社會福利效果。本文的主要發現如下：(1)不論廠商是否合作使用減排設施，廠商減排設施之投資與利潤及減排比例存在反向關係；環境稅與利潤呈反向關係，與減排比例呈正向關係。(2)不論廠商是否合作使用各自投資的減排設施，減排設施投資與社會福利呈正向關係；環境損害程度與社會福利呈反向關係。(3)廠商合作使用減排設施比不合作可以獲得更多的利潤與更高的減排比例；廠商合作使用減排設施的程度愈高，合作對不合作使用減排設施所造成之利潤差距與減排比例差距提高；如廠商減排設施之投資愈高，則合作對不合作使用減排設施所造成之利潤差距與減排比例差距將會降低。 When the two firms emit pollutants simultaneously and the government levies environmental tax on the polluting firms. This article constructs a three-stage game model to investigate firms’ pollution abatement policies and the social welfare effects under the cases of non-cooperation and cooperation respectively.Main findings of this article are as follows: (1) Whether the firms are pollution abatement facilities cooperatively or not, the change of firm’s investment in pollution abatement facilities has an inverse relation with the change of the profits of the firms and pollution abatement ratios; The change of environmental tax has an inverse relationship with the change of profit and a positive relationship with pollution abatement ratio. (2) Regardless of whether firms use pollution abatement facilities cooperatively or not, the change of pollution abatement investment has positive relationship with the change of social welfare; The change of degree of environmental damage has inverse relationship with the change of social welfare. (3) Cooperative use of pollution abatement facilities by firms lead to higher level of pollution abatement ratio and more profit than those in non-cooperative case; Higher degree of pollution abatement facilities usage by firms, leading to increase in the difference between profits and pollution abatement ratios under cooperative use of pollution abatement facilities and non-cooperation; Higher the investment in pollution abatement facilities, then the difference between profits and pollution abatement ratios under cooperation and non-cooperation decreases.
510 1 $a Environmental Tax, Pollution Abatement Cooperation, and Social Welfare $z eng
517 1 $a 環境稅污染減量合作和社會福利 $z chi
610 0 $a 環境稅 $a 污染減排 $a 社會福利
610 1 $a Environmental Tax $a Pollution Abatement $a Social Welfare
681 $a 008M/0019 $b 301208 7544 $v 2007年版
700 1 $a 陳 $b 葳 $4 撰 $3 518808
712 0 2 $a 國立高雄大學 $b 經營管理研究所 $3 170850
801 0 $a tw $b NUK $c 20111021 $g CCR
856 7 $z 電子資源 $2 http $u http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/57496903524293021320