國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Ghostworkers and Greens Collaborativ...

Arizona State University.

Ghostworkers and Greens Collaborative Engagements in Pesticide Reform, 1962--2011.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Ghostworkers and Greens Collaborative Engagements in Pesticide Reform, 1962--2011.
作者:	Tompkins, Adam.
面頁冊數:	386 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-07, Section: A, page: .
附註:	Adviser: Paul Hirt.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International72-07A.
標題:	History, United States.
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3454165
ISBN:	9781124630021

Ghostworkers and Greens Collaborative Engagements in Pesticide Reform, 1962--2011.
Tompkins, Adam.

Ghostworkers and Greens Collaborative Engagements in Pesticide Reform, 1962--2011. - 386 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-07, Section: A, page: .

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2011.

Growers and the USDA showed increasing favor for agricultural chemicals over cultural and biological forms of pest control through the first half of the twentieth century. With the introduction of DDT and other synthetic chemicals to commercial markets in the post-World War II era, pesticides became entrenched as the primary form of pest control in the industrial agriculture production system. Despite accumulating evidence that some pesticides posed a threat to human and environmental health, growers and government exercised path-dependent behavior in the development and implementation of pest control strategies. As pests developed resistance to regimens of agricultural chemicals, growers applied pesticides with greater toxicity in higher volumes to their fields with little consideration for the unintended consequences of using the economic poisons. Consequently, pressure from non-governmental organizations proved a necessary predicate for pesticide reform.

ISBN: 9781124630021Subjects--Topical Terms:

212533
History, United States.

Ghostworkers and Greens Collaborative Engagements in Pesticide Reform, 1962--2011.
LDR:03649nmm 2200361 4500 001 309701
005 20111105132449.5
008 111212s2011 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781124630021
035 $a (UMI)AAI3454165
035 $a AAI3454165
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Tompkins, Adam. $3 531027
245 1 0 $a Ghostworkers and Greens Collaborative Engagements in Pesticide Reform, 1962--2011.
300 $a 386 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-07, Section: A, page: .
500 $a Adviser: Paul Hirt.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2011.
520 $a Growers and the USDA showed increasing favor for agricultural chemicals over cultural and biological forms of pest control through the first half of the twentieth century. With the introduction of DDT and other synthetic chemicals to commercial markets in the post-World War II era, pesticides became entrenched as the primary form of pest control in the industrial agriculture production system. Despite accumulating evidence that some pesticides posed a threat to human and environmental health, growers and government exercised path-dependent behavior in the development and implementation of pest control strategies. As pests developed resistance to regimens of agricultural chemicals, growers applied pesticides with greater toxicity in higher volumes to their fields with little consideration for the unintended consequences of using the economic poisons. Consequently, pressure from non-governmental organizations proved a necessary predicate for pesticide reform.
520 $a This dissertation uses a series of case studies to examine the role of non-governmental organizations, particularly environmental organizations and farmworker groups, in pesticide reform from 1962 to 2011. For nearly fifty years, these groups served as educators, communicating scientific and experiential information about the adverse effects of pesticides on human health and environment to the public, and built support for the amendment of pesticide policies and the alteration of pesticide use practices. Their efforts led to the passage of more stringent regulations to better protect farmworkers, the public, and the environment. Environmental organizations and farmworker groups also acted as watchdogs, monitoring the activity of regulatory agencies and bringing suit when necessary to ensure that they fulfilled their responsibilities to the public.
520 $a This dissertation will build on previous scholarly work to show increasing collaboration between farmworker groups and environmental organizations. It argues that the organizations shared a common concern about the effects of pesticides on human health, which enabled bridge-builders within the disparate organizations to foster cooperative relationships. Bridge-building proved a mutually beneficial exercise. Variance in organizational strategies and the timing of different reform efforts limited, but did not eliminate, opportunities for collaboration. Coalitions formed when groups came together temporarily, and then drifted apart when a reform effort reached its terminus, leaving future collaboration still possible.
590 $a School code: 0010.
650 4 $a History, United States. $3 212533
650 4 $a Environmental Law. $3 278481
650 4 $a Environmental Studies. $3 492829
650 4 $a Political Science, General. $3 212408
690 $a 0337
690 $a 0439
690 $a 0477
690 $a 0615
710 2 $a Arizona State University. $b History. $3 531028
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 72-07A.
790 1 0 $a Hirt, Paul, $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Rome, Adam $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Adamson, Joni $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Rosales, F. $e committee member
790 $a 0010
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2011
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3454165