國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Pesticide policy preference and risk...

Hirsch, Rachel A.

Pesticide policy preference and risk perception in Canada: A case comparison in the neighbourhood context.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Pesticide policy preference and risk perception in Canada: A case comparison in the neighbourhood context.
作者:	Hirsch, Rachel A.
面頁冊數:	239 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-07, Section: A, page: .
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International72-07A.
標題:	Geography.
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=NR73468
ISBN:	9780494734681

Pesticide policy preference and risk perception in Canada: A case comparison in the neighbourhood context.
Hirsch, Rachel A.

Pesticide policy preference and risk perception in Canada: A case comparison in the neighbourhood context. - 239 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-07, Section: A, page: .

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Western Ontario (Canada), 2010.

The main objective of this study is to explore through three integrated-manuscripts why some people support a municipal pesticide bylaw and others do not. By comparing different policy climates, this research determines the relative support for mandatory as opposed to voluntary pesticide control approaches, considers the role social values play in defining a person's risk tolerance above and beyond health risk perceptions, and explores how antagonistic relationships with neighbours are influenced by a person's residential pesticide use.

ISBN: 9780494734681Subjects--Topical Terms:

174760
Geography.

Pesticide policy preference and risk perception in Canada: A case comparison in the neighbourhood context.
LDR:03614nmm 2200337 4500 001 309703
005 20111105132450.5
008 111212s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780494734681
035 $a (UMI)AAINR73468
035 $a AAINR73468
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Hirsch, Rachel A. $3 531031
245 1 0 $a Pesticide policy preference and risk perception in Canada: A case comparison in the neighbourhood context.
300 $a 239 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-07, Section: A, page: .
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Western Ontario (Canada), 2010.
520 $a The main objective of this study is to explore through three integrated-manuscripts why some people support a municipal pesticide bylaw and others do not. By comparing different policy climates, this research determines the relative support for mandatory as opposed to voluntary pesticide control approaches, considers the role social values play in defining a person's risk tolerance above and beyond health risk perceptions, and explores how antagonistic relationships with neighbours are influenced by a person's residential pesticide use.
520 $a Calgary, Halifax, and London were selected as comparative case study sites because each has implemented different pesticide reduction policies. Halifax has adopted a mandatory approach by instituting a pesticide ban. Calgary has taken a voluntary approach based on integrated pest management and public education. London was in transition and shortly after the study period adopted a pesticide ban. Multiple methods provide generalizeable (questionnaires) and more in-depth (interviews) information.
520 $a Manuscript 1: Quantitative findings based on questionnaire surveys of Calgary and Halifax residents analyzed using multiple binary logistic regression models support the overall hypothesis that both social (i.e., aesthetics and norms) and perceived health risk factors play important roles as determinants of pesticide policy preferences.
520 $a Manuscript 2: Findings from manuscript one were further tested quantitatively by the addition of another case site (London) and by adding questions on the cultural theory of risk. Again, multiple binary logistic regression models reveal that social context and health risk perceptions are both important factors in explaining residents' pesticide policy preferences.
520 $a Manuscript 3: Qualitative findings based on in-depth interviews with Calgary and Halifax residents reveal clearly established pro- and anti- pesticide bylaw narratives in each city including a larger 'alternatives to pesticides' meta-narrative rooted in the desire to avoid conflict with neighbours by maintaining yards.
520 $a Overall, this research adds knowledge regarding how social context plays into risk perceptions and restriction preferences at the neighbourhood and individual levels. On a policy level, this information should help policy makers, community activists and even landscape companies better appreciate how people make trade-offs between their own health, the health of the neighbourhood, and the look of the lawn with respect to pesticide attitudes and use.
520 $a KEYWORDS: pesticides, risk perception, policy, aesthetics, neighbours, social determinants of health, cultural theory of risk
590 $a School code: 0784.
650 4 $a Geography. $3 174760
650 4 $a Environmental Law. $3 278481
650 4 $a Political Science, General. $3 212408
690 $a 0366
690 $a 0439
690 $a 0615
710 2 $a The University of Western Ontario (Canada). $3 531032
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 72-07A.
790 $a 0784
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2010
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=NR73468