國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

鹿特丹規則國際裁判管轄權之研究 = The Study of The J...

國立高雄大學法律學系碩士班

鹿特丹規則國際裁判管轄權之研究 = The Study of The Jurisdiction of The Rotterdam Rules：an Attempt to Create The Jurisdiction of The Contract of Carriage in a General Ship in Taiwan : 我國件貨運送事件國際裁判管轄權制度之試建構

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : 單行本
並列題名:	The Study of The Jurisdiction of The Rotterdam Rules：an Attempt to Create The Jurisdiction of The Contract of Carriage in a General Ship in Taiwan
副題名:	我國件貨運送事件國際裁判管轄權制度之試建構
作者:	陳頂新,
其他團體作者:	國立高雄大學
出版地:	[高雄市]
出版者:	撰者;
出版年:	2012[民101]
面頁冊數:	277面圖，表 : 30公分;
標題:	鹿特丹規則
標題:	The 2009 Rotterdam Rules
電子資源:	http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/12458909113196688180
附註:	參考書目：面273-277
其他題名:	我國件貨運送事件國際裁判管轄權制度之試建構
摘要註:	自詡為海洋國家之台灣，對於最新之國際貨物運送公約－鹿特丹規則之制訂，應有何因應，為本論文的基礎思考核心。承該立基，本論文特針對極為重要之國際裁判管轄權議題，以鹿特丹規則之規範為中心，檢討我國件貨運送事件國際裁判管轄權之問題並提出解決辦法。為求見樹又見林，本論文於第二章中討論我國涉外民事事件之國際裁判管轄權規範，並兼顧質與量地分析實務見解，歸納我國涉外民事事件之國際裁判管轄權之問題，並提出初步建議，先建立宏觀視野。於第三章中，本論文針對我國海事事件國際裁判管轄權之規範進行分析，並與國際公約加以比較，點出我國海事事件國際裁判管轄權規範嚴重不足之情形，再就件貨運送事件之規範與實務見解微觀地深入分析，並提出中程建議。為避免閉門造車，本論文於第四章比較英國、美國與中國三大貿易大國之立法例，分析其國際裁判管轄權之規範，歸納其優、缺點，並提出值得我國借鏡之處。第五章為本論文研究中心，本章將鹿特丹規則中所有國際裁判管轄權之規範，逐條精密分析，並舉例詳盡說明，最後提出鹿特丹規則有疑義之處。知悉我國之問題並比較他國規範與國際主流價值－鹿特丹規則後，本論文提出具體結論並草擬我國件貨運送事件國際裁判管轄權之規範做為建議，最後展望我國海事法律之未來。 My thesis is to study the Jurisdiction of the 2009 Rotterdam Rules. In 2009, the “United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Carriage of Goods Wholly or Partly by Sea”, or “The 2009 Rotterdam Rules”, was signed at Rotterdam (Netherlands) by 24 countries. This convention resolution adopted by the General Assembly 63/122. It extends and modernizes the existing international rules relating to contract of maritime carriage of goods. Taiwan is an island in East Asia. It is close to mainland China and lies between the Philippines and Japan. It is a Ocean State, so international trade is very important for Taiwan. A good law can promote trade, but the jurisdiction of the contract of carriage in a general ship have no explicit legal in Taiwan , it is a Loophole.My thesis is attempt to create the jurisdiction of the contract of carriage in a general ship in Taiwan, and focus on the 2009 Rotterdam Rules. Because it is a new value of the international mainstream in International trade. The objective of this thesis was to examine two questions: first, how does this convention affect to the contract of carriage in a general ship in Taiwan? And second, in order to be geared to jurisdiction of international referee standards, what is the better way to redesign Taiwan’s Maritime Law? To examine these questions, analytical method, comparative method and inductive method was applied. My thesis is to study the Conflict of Laws in chapter two, study the Jurisdiction of Maritime Law and The contract of carriage in a general ship in chapter three, comparative Law in chapter four, my thesis to compare the Conflict of Laws and The Jurisdiction of The contract of carriage in a general ship of the United Kingdom the United States and China, study the Jurisdiction of the 2009 Rotterdam Rules in chapter five, finally proposes the conclusion in chapter six.The principal conclusion is that even though Taiwan that is unable signed the international Convention because by the most countries was not acknowledged, but Taiwan was still country of the sovereignty independence and the Maritime Law should base on the standards of international rules, and have it own rules also. Beside, this thesis provide new draft law for legislators to refer. And I hope after Causes our country to legislate to be more complete, it can attract more attention from the outside world and as a moth is drawn to the light, so is a litigant drawn to the Taiwan in one day.

鹿特丹規則國際裁判管轄權之研究 = The Study of The Jurisdiction of The Rotterdam Rules：an Attempt to Create The Jurisdiction of The Contract of Carriage in a General Ship in Taiwan : 我國件貨運送事件國際裁判管轄權制度之試建構
陳, 頂新

鹿特丹規則國際裁判管轄權之研究 = The Study of The Jurisdiction of The Rotterdam Rules：an Attempt to Create The Jurisdiction of The Contract of Carriage in a General Ship in Taiwan : 我國件貨運送事件國際裁判管轄權制度之試建構 / 陳頂新撰 - [高雄市] : 撰者, 2012[民101]. - 277面 ; 圖，表 ; 30公分.
參考書目：面273-277.
鹿特丹規則The 2009 Rotterdam Rules

鹿特丹規則國際裁判管轄權之研究 = The Study of The Jurisdiction of The Rotterdam Rules：an Attempt to Create The Jurisdiction of The Contract of Carriage in a General Ship in Taiwan : 我國件貨運送事件國際裁判管轄權制度之試建構
LDR:05496nam0a2200289 450 001 322916
005 20170214095648.0
009 322916
010 0 $b 精裝
010 0 $b 平裝
100 $a 20170214y2012 k y0chiy50 e
101 1 $a chi $d chi $d eng
102 $a tw
105 $a ak am 000yy
200 1 $a 鹿特丹規則國際裁判管轄權之研究 $e 我國件貨運送事件國際裁判管轄權制度之試建構 $d The Study of The Jurisdiction of The Rotterdam Rules：an Attempt to Create The Jurisdiction of The Contract of Carriage in a General Ship in Taiwan $z eng $f 陳頂新撰
210 $a [高雄市] $c 撰者 $d 2012[民101]
215 0 $a 277面 $c 圖，表 $d 30公分
300 $a 參考書目：面273-277
314 $a 指導教授：饒瑞正博士
328 $a 碩士論文--國立高雄大學法律學系碩士班
330 $a 自詡為海洋國家之台灣，對於最新之國際貨物運送公約－鹿特丹規則之制訂，應有何因應，為本論文的基礎思考核心。承該立基，本論文特針對極為重要之國際裁判管轄權議題，以鹿特丹規則之規範為中心，檢討我國件貨運送事件國際裁判管轄權之問題並提出解決辦法。為求見樹又見林，本論文於第二章中討論我國涉外民事事件之國際裁判管轄權規範，並兼顧質與量地分析實務見解，歸納我國涉外民事事件之國際裁判管轄權之問題，並提出初步建議，先建立宏觀視野。於第三章中，本論文針對我國海事事件國際裁判管轄權之規範進行分析，並與國際公約加以比較，點出我國海事事件國際裁判管轄權規範嚴重不足之情形，再就件貨運送事件之規範與實務見解微觀地深入分析，並提出中程建議。為避免閉門造車，本論文於第四章比較英國、美國與中國三大貿易大國之立法例，分析其國際裁判管轄權之規範，歸納其優、缺點，並提出值得我國借鏡之處。第五章為本論文研究中心，本章將鹿特丹規則中所有國際裁判管轄權之規範，逐條精密分析，並舉例詳盡說明，最後提出鹿特丹規則有疑義之處。知悉我國之問題並比較他國規範與國際主流價值－鹿特丹規則後，本論文提出具體結論並草擬我國件貨運送事件國際裁判管轄權之規範做為建議，最後展望我國海事法律之未來。 My thesis is to study the Jurisdiction of the 2009 Rotterdam Rules. In 2009, the “United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Carriage of Goods Wholly or Partly by Sea”, or “The 2009 Rotterdam Rules”, was signed at Rotterdam (Netherlands) by 24 countries. This convention resolution adopted by the General Assembly 63/122. It extends and modernizes the existing international rules relating to contract of maritime carriage of goods. Taiwan is an island in East Asia. It is close to mainland China and lies between the Philippines and Japan. It is a Ocean State, so international trade is very important for Taiwan. A good law can promote trade, but the jurisdiction of the contract of carriage in a general ship have no explicit legal in Taiwan , it is a Loophole.My thesis is attempt to create the jurisdiction of the contract of carriage in a general ship in Taiwan, and focus on the 2009 Rotterdam Rules. Because it is a new value of the international mainstream in International trade. The objective of this thesis was to examine two questions: first, how does this convention affect to the contract of carriage in a general ship in Taiwan? And second, in order to be geared to jurisdiction of international referee standards, what is the better way to redesign Taiwan’s Maritime Law? To examine these questions, analytical method, comparative method and inductive method was applied. My thesis is to study the Conflict of Laws in chapter two, study the Jurisdiction of Maritime Law and The contract of carriage in a general ship in chapter three, comparative Law in chapter four, my thesis to compare the Conflict of Laws and The Jurisdiction of The contract of carriage in a general ship of the United Kingdom the United States and China, study the Jurisdiction of the 2009 Rotterdam Rules in chapter five, finally proposes the conclusion in chapter six.The principal conclusion is that even though Taiwan that is unable signed the international Convention because by the most countries was not acknowledged, but Taiwan was still country of the sovereignty independence and the Maritime Law should base on the standards of international rules, and have it own rules also. Beside, this thesis provide new draft law for legislators to refer. And I hope after Causes our country to legislate to be more complete, it can attract more attention from the outside world and as a moth is drawn to the light, so is a litigant drawn to the Taiwan in one day.
510 1 $a The Study of The Jurisdiction of The Rotterdam Rules：an Attempt to Create The Jurisdiction of The Contract of Carriage in a General Ship in Taiwan $z eng
517 1 $a 我國件貨運送事件國際裁判管轄權制度之試建構 $z chi
610 0 $a 鹿特丹規則 $a 國際裁判管轄權 $a 海事事件 $a 件貨運送事件
610 1 $a The 2009 Rotterdam Rules $a Jurisdiction $a Maritime Law $a The Contract of Carriage in a General Ship
681 $a 008M/0019 $b 380101 7510.1 $v 2007年版
700 1 $a 陳 $b 頂新 $4 撰 $3 546940
712 0 2 $a 國立高雄大學 $b 法律學系碩士班 $3 166036
801 0 $a tw $b NUK $c 20120503 $g CCR
856 7 $z 電子資源 $2 http $u http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/12458909113196688180