國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

公民參與決策機制試行於統合治水之可行性評估~以美濃水患治理為例 = Th...

國立高雄大學都市發展與建築研究所

公民參與決策機制試行於統合治水之可行性評估~以美濃水患治理為例 = The Research of Integrated river basin management and the Mechanism of Citizen participation to Decision-making in Meinong of Taiwan

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : 單行本
並列題名:	The Research of Integrated river basin management and the Mechanism of Citizen participation to Decision-making in Meinong of Taiwan
作者:	魯台營,
其他團體作者:	國立高雄大學
出版地:	[高雄市]
出版者:	撰者;
出版年:	2012[民101]
面頁冊數:	117面圖，表 : 30公分;
標題:	綜合治水
標題:	Citizen participation
電子資源:	http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/46415043575524099312
附註:	106年4月25日公開
附註:	參考書目：面112-116
摘要註:	本研究從研究者本身參與美濃水患治理之公民運動關心開始，觀察美濃水患治理公私部門之衝突與困境引發研究動機。藉由深度訪談、文獻探討與研究者參與分析，整理公民參與決策定義與歸納公民參與決策方法演進並探討其限制，此研究可做為公民參與決策之重要參考。本研究首先探討台灣水患治理面臨困境。經由整理歸納台灣水患治理各階段及方法之演變，分析台灣治水由河道束洪、迅速排洪到綜合治水，工法由傳統圍堤束洪到滯洪，分洪工程之河道治理擴充為河道兩旁之滯洪與蓄洪土地利用,雖有更新與多元發展之勢，然仍為工程工法之考量，縱使水利主管單位提出之非工程手段，但因非其權責所轄亦將淪為空談而已。此外，本研究並進一步分析自「河道治理純工程階段」、「計劃治理綜合治水階段」到「生態治河、總合治水階段」等階段演進，歸納當前水患治理之困境為制度僵化與部門之間缺乏統合協調機制!並進而剖析由於缺乏公民參與機制及習慣，致使公私部門由互補關係到成為相互耗損對立。本研究由研讀分析及參與曾梓峰教授推動的「以全流域土地管理為手段之統合治水」之多項計劃案例，研究者親自造訪整理國外 (日本、德國與歐盟)之水患治理策略及公民參與決策，及代表公民團體參與國內水患治理議題之經驗，與近年關心水患治理之意見領袖訪談與建議，歸結公民參與決策之兩項正面價值即「問題發生的預防」與「多元思考之匯集」。經分析治水課題與對策後，本研究以美濃為例，提出水患治理之修正建議即:1.在技術面，美濃水患治理之思考應由河道治理擴及至全流域土地管理之統合治水。2.在制度面，應由管理河道治理之水利單位單一負擔權責擴至以全流域土地管理方式之「流域治理委員會」為治理權責單位。3.由於美濃公民運動之成熟，建議透過成立中介力量之公民聯盟，並藉由聯盟代表加入「流域治理委員會」，能促使資訊更透明與提供更多公民參與決策機會，進而強化公民參與的實現。最後，本研究於結論評估以上修正建議之可行性，因為1. 藉由統合治理委員會成立，將可解決水利單位獨自承擔治水權責重擔與行政橫向溝通障礙之困境。2. 藉由「美濃溪流域整體水系治理及景觀營造綱要計畫」之擬訂，與相關子計劃之推動等多元策略，將可獲得最佳之治水成效。3. 藉由公民團體代表擔任委員會之委員，可更有效讓公民獲得更多資訊，俾利掌握及爭取更多元、更寬廣之參與決策機會，可激發更多意見，擬聚更多具優勢之共識，避免衝突與不信任感，係為解決河川問題之最佳方案。 The study is motivated by the observation of the conflict and dilemma of flood management in Meilong as well as is initiated by author’s personal interests of citizen participation to flood control in the area. Through by-depth interviews, literature review and researchers' analysis, organization of the definition of citizen participation during policy-making process, and the summarization of the evolution of methods and the exploration of its restrictions, this study is expected to become as an essential reference of citizen participation to policy making. The study first explores the existing dilemma of the flooding governance in Taiwan. Through summarizing the evolution of the various stages and methods used for flood control in Taiwan, we discovered the methods of Taiwan's flood control have been transformed from the channeling the flood and quickly discharging flood to comprehensive water management. Methodologically, the construction methods were evolved from traditional channeling to detention. The flood diversion engineering was expanded into the detention onto two sides of river banks and the planning of land use for flood storage. It has been yet the methodological consideration of the engineering construction though the evolution seemed to be more updated and diverse. It would be merely a talk due to the lack of jurisdiction even though water authority has proposed some non-constructional strategies as the solutions.In addition, the study further analyzes the evolution from "the engineering phase of the river management and the planned management and integrated flood control phase" to the stage of "ecological river management and combined flood control” and summarizes that the current dilemma of flood control is mainly due to the existing rigid system and the lack of integrated and coordinated mechanism among the departments. It is also discovered that the complimentary relationship between public and private sectors has turned into mutual depleting and hostile because of shorting citizen participation mechanism and customs. This study concluded two valuable concepts of "the prevention of problems occurrence" and "the collections of diverse thinking" from the analysis and personal involvement to several implementation of "Integrated land management of watershed as the means for flood control" project led by Professor Tseng, summaries of author's personal observations from overseas visits (Japan, Germany and the EU) regarding flood management strategies and citizen participation during policy-making process, author's personal experiences from participating domestic flood control discussions on behalf of the citizen groups, and the suggestions from the interviews with opinion leaders who have concerned and involved flood control in recent years. Through the analysis of issues and strategies of flood control, the study discussed the experiences in Meinong to present the suggestions for improving flood control as the follows: 1. Technically, the consideration flood control in Meinong should be expanded from the perspectives of river management to comprehensive flood control over the watershed land management. 2. Systematically, the responsibilities of the watershed management should be authorized to the "Watershed Management Committee" as the designated authority to manage instead of the sole water authority to bear the responsibilities of river management. 3.Accompanying the gradual maturity of the citizen's movement in Meinong, it is suggested to promote more transparent information and provide more opportunities for citizen's participation during policy-making process for further enhancing the realization of overall citizen participation through establishing citizen's alliance as the intermediary agent and joining the "Watershed Management Committee" representing the citizens' alliance. Lastly, the conclusion in the study assesses the feasibility of the aforementioned suggestions because: 1.The establishment of comprehensive governing committee could solve the problems regarding the burdens solely undertaken by the water authority on river governance and the barriers existed from horizontal communication among the administrations. 2.Implementing multi-strategies such as planning the "Meinong River Watershed and Landscape Framework" and promoting other relevant plans could encourage better performance on water control. 3.Serving the member in the aforementioned committee representing the citizen groups should be the best solution to river management issues since it could assist citizens to effectively access to more open data for citizens, beneficially seek and retain more diverse and broader opportunities for participating the policy-making process, encourage more suggestions, facilitate more advantageous consensus, and avoid conflict and distrust.

公民參與決策機制試行於統合治水之可行性評估~以美濃水患治理為例 = The Research of Integrated river basin management and the Mechanism of Citizen participation to Decision-making in Meinong of Taiwan
魯, 台營

公民參與決策機制試行於統合治水之可行性評估~以美濃水患治理為例 = The Research of Integrated river basin management and the Mechanism of Citizen participation to Decision-making in Meinong of Taiwan / 魯台營撰 - [高雄市] : 撰者, 2012[民101]. - 117面 ; 圖，表 ; 30公分.
106年4月25日公開參考書目：面112-116.
綜合治水Citizen participation

公民參與決策機制試行於統合治水之可行性評估~以美濃水患治理為例 = The Research of Integrated river basin management and the Mechanism of Citizen participation to Decision-making in Meinong of Taiwan
LDR:09159nam0 2200277 450 001 322935
005 20170505090334.0
010 0 $b 精裝
010 0 $b 平裝
100 $a 20120327d2012 k y0chiy50 e
101 1 $a chi $d chi $d eng
102 $a tw
105 $a ak am 000yy
200 1 $a 公民參與決策機制試行於統合治水之可行性評估~以美濃水患治理為例 $d The Research of Integrated river basin management and the Mechanism of Citizen participation to Decision-making in Meinong of Taiwan $z eng $f 魯台營撰
210 $a [高雄市] $c 撰者 $d 2012[民101]
215 0 $a 117面 $c 圖，表 $d 30公分
300 $a 106年4月25日公開
300 $a 參考書目：面112-116
314 $a 指導教授：曾梓峰博士
328 $a 碩士論文--國立高雄大學都市發展與建築研究所
330 $a 本研究從研究者本身參與美濃水患治理之公民運動關心開始，觀察美濃水患治理公私部門之衝突與困境引發研究動機。藉由深度訪談、文獻探討與研究者參與分析，整理公民參與決策定義與歸納公民參與決策方法演進並探討其限制，此研究可做為公民參與決策之重要參考。本研究首先探討台灣水患治理面臨困境。經由整理歸納台灣水患治理各階段及方法之演變，分析台灣治水由河道束洪、迅速排洪到綜合治水，工法由傳統圍堤束洪到滯洪，分洪工程之河道治理擴充為河道兩旁之滯洪與蓄洪土地利用,雖有更新與多元發展之勢，然仍為工程工法之考量，縱使水利主管單位提出之非工程手段，但因非其權責所轄亦將淪為空談而已。此外，本研究並進一步分析自「河道治理純工程階段」、「計劃治理綜合治水階段」到「生態治河、總合治水階段」等階段演進，歸納當前水患治理之困境為制度僵化與部門之間缺乏統合協調機制!並進而剖析由於缺乏公民參與機制及習慣，致使公私部門由互補關係到成為相互耗損對立。本研究由研讀分析及參與曾梓峰教授推動的「以全流域土地管理為手段之統合治水」之多項計劃案例，研究者親自造訪整理國外 (日本、德國與歐盟)之水患治理策略及公民參與決策，及代表公民團體參與國內水患治理議題之經驗，與近年關心水患治理之意見領袖訪談與建議，歸結公民參與決策之兩項正面價值即「問題發生的預防」與「多元思考之匯集」。經分析治水課題與對策後，本研究以美濃為例，提出水患治理之修正建議即:1.在技術面，美濃水患治理之思考應由河道治理擴及至全流域土地管理之統合治水。2.在制度面，應由管理河道治理之水利單位單一負擔權責擴至以全流域土地管理方式之「流域治理委員會」為治理權責單位。3.由於美濃公民運動之成熟，建議透過成立中介力量之公民聯盟，並藉由聯盟代表加入「流域治理委員會」，能促使資訊更透明與提供更多公民參與決策機會，進而強化公民參與的實現。最後，本研究於結論評估以上修正建議之可行性，因為1. 藉由統合治理委員會成立，將可解決水利單位獨自承擔治水權責重擔與行政橫向溝通障礙之困境。2. 藉由「美濃溪流域整體水系治理及景觀營造綱要計畫」之擬訂，與相關子計劃之推動等多元策略，將可獲得最佳之治水成效。3. 藉由公民團體代表擔任委員會之委員，可更有效讓公民獲得更多資訊，俾利掌握及爭取更多元、更寬廣之參與決策機會，可激發更多意見，擬聚更多具優勢之共識，避免衝突與不信任感，係為解決河川問題之最佳方案。 The study is motivated by the observation of the conflict and dilemma of flood management in Meilong as well as is initiated by author’s personal interests of citizen participation to flood control in the area. Through by-depth interviews, literature review and researchers' analysis, organization of the definition of citizen participation during policy-making process, and the summarization of the evolution of methods and the exploration of its restrictions, this study is expected to become as an essential reference of citizen participation to policy making. The study first explores the existing dilemma of the flooding governance in Taiwan. Through summarizing the evolution of the various stages and methods used for flood control in Taiwan, we discovered the methods of Taiwan's flood control have been transformed from the channeling the flood and quickly discharging flood to comprehensive water management. Methodologically, the construction methods were evolved from traditional channeling to detention. The flood diversion engineering was expanded into the detention onto two sides of river banks and the planning of land use for flood storage. It has been yet the methodological consideration of the engineering construction though the evolution seemed to be more updated and diverse. It would be merely a talk due to the lack of jurisdiction even though water authority has proposed some non-constructional strategies as the solutions.In addition, the study further analyzes the evolution from "the engineering phase of the river management and the planned management and integrated flood control phase" to the stage of "ecological river management and combined flood control” and summarizes that the current dilemma of flood control is mainly due to the existing rigid system and the lack of integrated and coordinated mechanism among the departments. It is also discovered that the complimentary relationship between public and private sectors has turned into mutual depleting and hostile because of shorting citizen participation mechanism and customs. This study concluded two valuable concepts of "the prevention of problems occurrence" and "the collections of diverse thinking" from the analysis and personal involvement to several implementation of "Integrated land management of watershed as the means for flood control" project led by Professor Tseng, summaries of author's personal observations from overseas visits (Japan, Germany and the EU) regarding flood management strategies and citizen participation during policy-making process, author's personal experiences from participating domestic flood control discussions on behalf of the citizen groups, and the suggestions from the interviews with opinion leaders who have concerned and involved flood control in recent years. Through the analysis of issues and strategies of flood control, the study discussed the experiences in Meinong to present the suggestions for improving flood control as the follows: 1. Technically, the consideration flood control in Meinong should be expanded from the perspectives of river management to comprehensive flood control over the watershed land management. 2. Systematically, the responsibilities of the watershed management should be authorized to the "Watershed Management Committee" as the designated authority to manage instead of the sole water authority to bear the responsibilities of river management. 3.Accompanying the gradual maturity of the citizen's movement in Meinong, it is suggested to promote more transparent information and provide more opportunities for citizen's participation during policy-making process for further enhancing the realization of overall citizen participation through establishing citizen's alliance as the intermediary agent and joining the "Watershed Management Committee" representing the citizens' alliance. Lastly, the conclusion in the study assesses the feasibility of the aforementioned suggestions because: 1.The establishment of comprehensive governing committee could solve the problems regarding the burdens solely undertaken by the water authority on river governance and the barriers existed from horizontal communication among the administrations. 2.Implementing multi-strategies such as planning the "Meinong River Watershed and Landscape Framework" and promoting other relevant plans could encourage better performance on water control. 3.Serving the member in the aforementioned committee representing the citizen groups should be the best solution to river management issues since it could assist citizens to effectively access to more open data for citizens, beneficially seek and retain more diverse and broader opportunities for participating the policy-making process, encourage more suggestions, facilitate more advantageous consensus, and avoid conflict and distrust.
510 1 $a The Research of Integrated river basin management and the Mechanism of Citizen participation to Decision-making in Meinong of Taiwan $z eng
610 0 $a 綜合治水 $a 統合治水 $a 公民參與 $a 美濃水患治理
610 1 $a Citizen participation $a Integrated river basin management $a Meinong flood control $a Integrated flood control
681 $a 008M/0019 $b 582204 2729 $v 2007年版
700 1 $a 魯 $b 台營 $4 撰 $3 546959
712 0 2 $a 國立高雄大學 $b 都市發展與建築研究所 $3 71828
801 0 $a tw $b NUK $c 20170327 $g CCR
856 7 # $u http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/46415043575524099312 $2 http $z 電子資源