國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

程序正義與行政裁量衝突之微觀研究 = A Micro Study of ...

國立高雄大學政治法律學系碩士班

程序正義與行政裁量衝突之微觀研究 = A Micro Study of the Conflicts between Procedural Justice and Administrative Discretion：A Case Study of Teacher Handling Student’s Complaints in One Junior High School : 以某國中教師處理學生懲戒申訴案件為例

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : 單行本
並列題名:	A Micro Study of the Conflicts between Procedural Justice and Administrative Discretion：A Case Study of Teacher Handling Student’s Complaints in One Junior High School
副題名:	以某國中教師處理學生懲戒申訴案件為例
作者:	蕭敏秀,
其他團體作者:	國立高雄大學
出版地:	[高雄市]
出版者:	撰者;
出版年:	2012[民101]
面頁冊數:	149面圖，表格 : 30公分;
標題:	程序正義
標題:	Procedural Justice
電子資源:	http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/44996676795895983461
附註:	附錄：學校訂定教師輔導與管教學生辦法注意事項等12種
附註:	參考書目：面87-90
其他題名:	以某國中教師處理學生懲戒申訴案件為例
摘要註:	本研究以某國中教師處理學生懲戒申訴案件為觀察，探討程序正義與行政裁量之衝突，並就其衝突的原因、衝突的結果以及事件產生之影響進行分析與探討。研究方法採用文獻資料分析相關議題以及深度訪談法蒐集相關資料，描繪出事件之完整輪廓，以進一步對該案例之繫爭事實及繫爭法規進行分析與評論。又由於衝突本身來自於國中學生懲戒及申訴案件，因此研究中兼論國中學生之在學關係如何影響學生之權益以及申訴制度之演變，透過對學生懲戒以及申訴制度的探討，期能對本研究之目的有所回應。本研究於探討及分析的過程中，發現學生管教及懲戒措施的相關教育法令間隱藏著部份的矛盾，該矛盾可能會造成裁量收縮至零的瑕疵，產生法規適用上之問題，以致發生懲戒過程之程序正義與行政裁量之衝突，更進一步探究的結果，發現在重大違規事項中，擁有懲戒決定最終行政裁量權者是為校長，然這樣的制度設計與法治國的原則有所牴觸。另外從案例中發現不管是懲戒過程或是申訴過程所產生之問題及誤會，除了法規之矛盾外，另一部份的重要原因來自於教師及教育人員法治概念之不足，以及缺乏有效溝通所致，因此要解決這樣的難題，除了增進教師之法治概念以及對於學生懲戒與申訴法令之專業素養外，如何進行有效的溝通則是學校首要之務，以避免學校教師因為系統規則的高度運作而壓縮相互溝通之空間，要改善學校人員之間的溝通，可以參考哈伯瑪斯的溝通行動理論，提升校內人員的溝通能力，做出合理有效之宣稱並通過相互辯證之過程取得共識，如此將能為學校運作注入和諧及融洽之潤滑劑，俾使得教育的功能得以不受程序之干擾。 The study, on the one hand, observes the case of one teacher’s dealing with the student’s complaint about discipline to understand and discuss the conflicts between the procedural justice and administrative discretion; on the other hand, the study analyzes and discusses the causes, the results, and the effects of such conflicts. The research methods include document analysis and in-depth interview to try to depict the complete outline of the event so as to further analyze and comment on the relative facts and relative laws and regulations of the case. Besides, the conflict comes from a student’s complain about discipline, so the study also discusses how the relation between student and school affects students’ rights and how the appealing system develops. By discussing the student discipline and appealing system, the study hopes to show its goals. During the discussion and analysis, we find that there exist some contradictions among the laws and regulations for student discipline and punishment. Such contradictions may cause the shrink or even disappearance of discretion. When the laws and regulations are applied during the process of discipline, the conflicts between procedural justice and administrative discretion emerge. Through the further investigation, we find that when the vital offenses against the school regulations happen, the one who has the final administrative discretion is the school principal. However, such system design contradicts the principle of a country under the rule of law.Furthermore, in the studied case, the problems and misunderstanding from the discipline process or from the appealing process derive not only from the contradictions among the laws and regulations but also from both the school staff’s insufficient knowledge about the laws and regulations and the lack of the effective communication. Thus, in order to solve such problems, besides improving the knowledge of laws and regulations, school staff should also raise their professional cultivation about student discipline and appealing regulations. So, to avoid squeezing the space for mutual communication among school staff due to the highly operated system rules, how to proceed with effective communication becomes the school’s top priority. Referring to J. Habermas’s Theory of Communicative Action, school staff can improve their communication and raise their communication ability. Consequently, they can make reasonable and effective declaration and reach an agreement through the process of mutual argument. As a result, the harmonious and friendly lubricator can be added to the school operation so as to keep the educational function from the procedural interference.

程序正義與行政裁量衝突之微觀研究 = A Micro Study of the Conflicts between Procedural Justice and Administrative Discretion：A Case Study of Teacher Handling Student’s Complaints in One Junior High School : 以某國中教師處理學生懲戒申訴案件為例
蕭, 敏秀

程序正義與行政裁量衝突之微觀研究 = A Micro Study of the Conflicts between Procedural Justice and Administrative Discretion：A Case Study of Teacher Handling Student’s Complaints in One Junior High School : 以某國中教師處理學生懲戒申訴案件為例 / 蕭敏秀撰 - [高雄市] : 撰者, 2012[民101]. - 149面 ; 圖，表格 ; 30公分.
附錄：學校訂定教師輔導與管教學生辦法注意事項等12種參考書目：面87-90.
程序正義Procedural Justice

程序正義與行政裁量衝突之微觀研究 = A Micro Study of the Conflicts between Procedural Justice and Administrative Discretion：A Case Study of Teacher Handling Student’s Complaints in One Junior High School : 以某國中教師處理學生懲戒申訴案件為例
LDR:06267nam0a2200301 450 001 346068
005 20230523164029.0
009 346068
010 0 $b 精裝
010 0 $b 平裝
100 $a 20121108d2012 k y0chiy05 e
101 1 $a chi $d chi $d eng
102 $a tw
105 $a ak am 000yy
200 1 $a 程序正義與行政裁量衝突之微觀研究 $e 以某國中教師處理學生懲戒申訴案件為例 $d A Micro Study of the Conflicts between Procedural Justice and Administrative Discretion：A Case Study of Teacher Handling Student’s Complaints in One Junior High School $z eng $f 蕭敏秀撰
210 $a [高雄市] $c 撰者 $d 2012[民101]
215 0 $a 149面 $c 圖，表格 $d 30公分
300 $a 附錄：學校訂定教師輔導與管教學生辦法注意事項等12種
300 $a 參考書目：面87-90
314 $a 指導教授：廖義銘博士
328 $a 碩士論文--國立高雄大學政治法律學系碩士班
330 $a 本研究以某國中教師處理學生懲戒申訴案件為觀察，探討程序正義與行政裁量之衝突，並就其衝突的原因、衝突的結果以及事件產生之影響進行分析與探討。研究方法採用文獻資料分析相關議題以及深度訪談法蒐集相關資料，描繪出事件之完整輪廓，以進一步對該案例之繫爭事實及繫爭法規進行分析與評論。又由於衝突本身來自於國中學生懲戒及申訴案件，因此研究中兼論國中學生之在學關係如何影響學生之權益以及申訴制度之演變，透過對學生懲戒以及申訴制度的探討，期能對本研究之目的有所回應。本研究於探討及分析的過程中，發現學生管教及懲戒措施的相關教育法令間隱藏著部份的矛盾，該矛盾可能會造成裁量收縮至零的瑕疵，產生法規適用上之問題，以致發生懲戒過程之程序正義與行政裁量之衝突，更進一步探究的結果，發現在重大違規事項中，擁有懲戒決定最終行政裁量權者是為校長，然這樣的制度設計與法治國的原則有所牴觸。另外從案例中發現不管是懲戒過程或是申訴過程所產生之問題及誤會，除了法規之矛盾外，另一部份的重要原因來自於教師及教育人員法治概念之不足，以及缺乏有效溝通所致，因此要解決這樣的難題，除了增進教師之法治概念以及對於學生懲戒與申訴法令之專業素養外，如何進行有效的溝通則是學校首要之務，以避免學校教師因為系統規則的高度運作而壓縮相互溝通之空間，要改善學校人員之間的溝通，可以參考哈伯瑪斯的溝通行動理論，提升校內人員的溝通能力，做出合理有效之宣稱並通過相互辯證之過程取得共識，如此將能為學校運作注入和諧及融洽之潤滑劑，俾使得教育的功能得以不受程序之干擾。 The study, on the one hand, observes the case of one teacher’s dealing with the student’s complaint about discipline to understand and discuss the conflicts between the procedural justice and administrative discretion; on the other hand, the study analyzes and discusses the causes, the results, and the effects of such conflicts. The research methods include document analysis and in-depth interview to try to depict the complete outline of the event so as to further analyze and comment on the relative facts and relative laws and regulations of the case. Besides, the conflict comes from a student’s complain about discipline, so the study also discusses how the relation between student and school affects students’ rights and how the appealing system develops. By discussing the student discipline and appealing system, the study hopes to show its goals. During the discussion and analysis, we find that there exist some contradictions among the laws and regulations for student discipline and punishment. Such contradictions may cause the shrink or even disappearance of discretion. When the laws and regulations are applied during the process of discipline, the conflicts between procedural justice and administrative discretion emerge. Through the further investigation, we find that when the vital offenses against the school regulations happen, the one who has the final administrative discretion is the school principal. However, such system design contradicts the principle of a country under the rule of law.Furthermore, in the studied case, the problems and misunderstanding from the discipline process or from the appealing process derive not only from the contradictions among the laws and regulations but also from both the school staff’s insufficient knowledge about the laws and regulations and the lack of the effective communication. Thus, in order to solve such problems, besides improving the knowledge of laws and regulations, school staff should also raise their professional cultivation about student discipline and appealing regulations. So, to avoid squeezing the space for mutual communication among school staff due to the highly operated system rules, how to proceed with effective communication becomes the school’s top priority. Referring to J. Habermas’s Theory of Communicative Action, school staff can improve their communication and raise their communication ability. Consequently, they can make reasonable and effective declaration and reach an agreement through the process of mutual argument. As a result, the harmonious and friendly lubricator can be added to the school operation so as to keep the educational function from the procedural interference.
510 1 $a A Micro Study of the Conflicts between Procedural Justice and Administrative Discretion $e A Case Study of Teacher Handling Student’s Complaints in One Junior High School $z eng
517 1 $a 以某國中教師處理學生懲戒申訴案件為例 $z chi
610 0 $a 程序正義 $a 行政裁量 $a 學生懲戒 $a 申訴制度 $a 溝通行動理論
610 1 $a Procedural Justice $a Administrative Discretion $a Student Discipline $a Appealing System $a The Theory of Communicative Action
681 $a 008M/0019 $b 382101 4482 $v 2007年版
700 1 $a 蕭 $b 敏秀 $4 撰 $3 576296
712 0 2 $a 國立高雄大學 $b 政治法律學系碩士班 $3 166052
801 0 $a tw $b NUK $c 20121107 $g CCR
856 7 $z 電子資源 $2 http $u http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/44996676795895983461