國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

我國文化創意產業政策之國家角色定位 = The role of our ...

吳明錡

我國文化創意產業政策之國家角色定位 = The role of our government for Cultural and Creative Industries：take the subsidization policy by the Central Administrations as an example : 以中央主管官署政策補助制度為例

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : 單行本
並列題名:	The role of our government for Cultural and Creative Industries：take the subsidization policy by the Central Administrations as an example
副題名:	以中央主管官署政策補助制度為例
作者:	吳明錡,
其他團體作者:	國立高雄大學
出版地:	[高雄市]
出版者:	撰者;
出版年:	2012[民101]
面頁冊數:	6, 116面圖，表格 : 30公分;
標題:	文化創意產業
標題:	Cultural and Creative Industry
電子資源:	http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/06233450604815781429
附註:	參考書目：面97-102
附註:	附錄一：文化創意產業發展法
附註:	附錄二：文化藝術獎助條例
其他題名:	以中央主管官署政策補助制度為例
摘要註:	我國政府在文化政策推廣上，透過不同的文化政策推動方式，給予藝文團體文化獎勵補助達到深化民間藝文的能量，早已是國家重要政策之一。2002年台灣開始了文化創意產業發展計畫，希望透過台灣地方特色結合地理環境，以人文藝術作為發展根基，提升國內整體經濟發展。然而政府在直接補助或文化創意產業的輔助制度上仍有不足情況，對音樂及表演藝術團體來說，仍有需求預算不足、分配不均等問題，需要從政府補助制度上去探討。本文整理了三個部分，首先，透過文獻探討思考政府與文化藝術之間的關係，國家在文化藝術補助所扮演的角色與功能，並瞭解美國、英國、法國先進國家，其政府介入藝文補助時如何權衡藝文團體與政府間互動關係。第二部分，關於我國中央文化藝術補助機關─文化部與國藝會之介紹與補助政策討論。第三部分、探討台灣文化創意產業政策背景與推動的方式是如何呈現，文化創意產業補助政策對音樂及表演藝術影響。 To popularize culture policies, our government has worked on it through different ways. Among these, offering the cultural and artistic groups subsidies to strengthen their power has been one of the most important ways. Taiwan has started the plan of developing the Cultural and Creative Industries from 2002. By combining the local characteristics with the environment, based on the culture and creativity, our government hope to develop the related industries and then improve the domestic economy. However, there's still something insufficient in the system of subsidization and assistance for Cultural and Creative Industries. For musical and performance arts group, there are some problems, including budget shortage and unequal allotment, which the government have to probe into from the system. In this artical, there are three parts. First of all, by documents and records, we're going to talk about the relationship between the government and cultural arts, the role the government plays in the subsidization for cultural art, and how the government of advanced countries (America, England, France) balances the interaction with the cultural arts groups on subsidization. Secondly, our government organizations which work on cultural art subsidization will be introduced, incluing Ministry of Culture and National Culture and Arts Foundation, and the policies for subsidization will be discussed. Thirdly, we’ll take a look at the background of the Cultural and Creative Industries in Taiwan and how these industries are developed. Moreover, the impact which the subsidization policies make on music and performance arts.

我國文化創意產業政策之國家角色定位 = The role of our government for Cultural and Creative Industries：take the subsidization policy by the Central Administrations as an example : 以中央主管官署政策補助制度為例
吳, 明錡

我國文化創意產業政策之國家角色定位 = The role of our government for Cultural and Creative Industries：take the subsidization policy by the Central Administrations as an example : 以中央主管官署政策補助制度為例 / 吳明錡撰 - [高雄市] : 撰者, 2012[民101]. - 6, 116面 ; 圖，表格 ; 30公分.
參考書目：面97-102附錄一：文化創意產業發展法附錄二：文化藝術獎助條例.
文化創意產業Cultural and Creative Industry

我國文化創意產業政策之國家角色定位 = The role of our government for Cultural and Creative Industries：take the subsidization policy by the Central Administrations as an example : 以中央主管官署政策補助制度為例
LDR:04363nam a2200313 4500 001 346071
005 20230619203540.0
009 346071
010 0 $b 精裝
010 0 $b 平裝
100 $a 20121108d2012 k y0chiy05 e
101 1 $a chi $d chi $d eng
102 $a tw
105 $a ak am 000yy
200 1 $a 我國文化創意產業政策之國家角色定位 $e 以中央主管官署政策補助制度為例 $d The role of our government for Cultural and Creative Industries：take the subsidization policy by the Central Administrations as an example $z eng $f 吳明錡撰
210 $a [高雄市] $c 撰者 $d 2012[民101]
215 0 $a 6, 116面 $c 圖，表格 $d 30公分
300 $a 參考書目：面97-102
300 $a 附錄一：文化創意產業發展法
300 $a 附錄二：文化藝術獎助條例
314 $a 指導教授：楊鈞池博士
328 $a 碩士論文--國立高雄大學政治法律學系碩士班
330 $a 我國政府在文化政策推廣上，透過不同的文化政策推動方式，給予藝文團體文化獎勵補助達到深化民間藝文的能量，早已是國家重要政策之一。2002年台灣開始了文化創意產業發展計畫，希望透過台灣地方特色結合地理環境，以人文藝術作為發展根基，提升國內整體經濟發展。然而政府在直接補助或文化創意產業的輔助制度上仍有不足情況，對音樂及表演藝術團體來說，仍有需求預算不足、分配不均等問題，需要從政府補助制度上去探討。本文整理了三個部分，首先，透過文獻探討思考政府與文化藝術之間的關係，國家在文化藝術補助所扮演的角色與功能，並瞭解美國、英國、法國先進國家，其政府介入藝文補助時如何權衡藝文團體與政府間互動關係。第二部分，關於我國中央文化藝術補助機關─文化部與國藝會之介紹與補助政策討論。第三部分、探討台灣文化創意產業政策背景與推動的方式是如何呈現，文化創意產業補助政策對音樂及表演藝術影響。 To popularize culture policies, our government has worked on it through different ways. Among these, offering the cultural and artistic groups subsidies to strengthen their power has been one of the most important ways. Taiwan has started the plan of developing the Cultural and Creative Industries from 2002. By combining the local characteristics with the environment, based on the culture and creativity, our government hope to develop the related industries and then improve the domestic economy. However, there's still something insufficient in the system of subsidization and assistance for Cultural and Creative Industries. For musical and performance arts group, there are some problems, including budget shortage and unequal allotment, which the government have to probe into from the system. In this artical, there are three parts. First of all, by documents and records, we're going to talk about the relationship between the government and cultural arts, the role the government plays in the subsidization for cultural art, and how the government of advanced countries (America, England, France) balances the interaction with the cultural arts groups on subsidization. Secondly, our government organizations which work on cultural art subsidization will be introduced, incluing Ministry of Culture and National Culture and Arts Foundation, and the policies for subsidization will be discussed. Thirdly, we’ll take a look at the background of the Cultural and Creative Industries in Taiwan and how these industries are developed. Moreover, the impact which the subsidization policies make on music and performance arts.
510 1 $a The role of our government for Cultural and Creative Industries $e take the subsidization policy by the Central Administrations as an example $z eng
517 1 $a 以中央主管官署政策補助制度為例 $z chi
610 0 $a 文化創意產業 $a 文化補助政策 $a 文化部 $a 國藝會 $a 音樂及表演藝術產業
610 1 $a Cultural and Creative Industry $a cultural subsidy policy $a Culture and Arts Foundation $a Ministry of Culture National $a musical and performance arts
681 $a 008M/0019 $b 382102 2668 $v 2007年版
700 1 $a 吳 $b 明錡 $4 撰 $3 576299
712 0 2 $a 國立高雄大學 $b 政治法律學系碩士班 $3 166052
801 0 $a tw $b NUK $c 20121107 $g CCR
856 7 $z 電子資源 $2 http $u http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/06233450604815781429