國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

毒品授權與定義之橫解縱剖 = The Research of the A...

國立高雄大學政治法律學系碩士班

毒品授權與定義之橫解縱剖 = The Research of the Authority and Criteria of Narcotics

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : 單行本
並列題名:	The Research of the Authority and Criteria of Narcotics
作者:	魏志勝,
其他團體作者:	國立高雄大學
出版地:	[高雄市]
出版者:	撰者;
出版年:	2013[民102]
面頁冊數:	121面圖，表格 : 30公分;
標題:	毒品定義
標題:	Drug definitions
電子資源:	http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/47110743188467134228
附註:	參考書目：面109-114
摘要註:	本文主要討論我國「毒品危害防制條例」第2條第一項的毒品定義，由於定義要素與分級要素相同，因此一併討論定義及分級標準的妥當性問題。不過所謂的妥當性的問題並非可單獨由毒品本身觀察，因單獨就毒品觀察定義要素之「成癮性」、「濫用性」及「社會危害性」，直覺上並不會感覺不妥，因為這三個名詞恰好與人民長久對於毒品的法感情相契合，因此討論毒品定義與分級要素的妥當性必須與其相關的刑法制度合併觀察。在毒品危害防制條例中毒品定義不能僅代表立法者基於歷史情節對毒品的負面評價，更重要的是毒品定義及分級標準屬於立法授權行政決定「是否」及「如何」管制特定物質的標準。在「罪刑法定原則」主宰的刑法領域，立法授權往往是重大議題，況且行政機關依據毒品定義及分級標準所決定的毒品更是整部法律規制各類不法行為態樣的不法核心，因此毒品定義及分級標準所涉及的層面是刑罰授權議題。刑法雖為法益保護法，但構成要件具有保障行為自由的重要機能，因此毒品定義及分級的妥當性應該是由此層面切入討論。本文研究目的希望透過「毒品本質」、「刑法理論」及「憲法原則」驗證現行毒品定義及分級標準是否違反「刑法授權明確性」，並且連帶就毒品定義及分級相關聯的「法律適用」、「立法制定」及「立法監督」等議題合併討論，以期增加本論文的完整性。 This article focuses on China's "Drug Prevention Ordinance 2 drugs definition, the defining elements of the same ranking factor be discussed the validity of the definition and grading standards. However, the validity problem is not available separately observed by the drug itself, separate drug observe the defining elements of "addiction", "abuse" and "harmful to society, intuition does not feel wrong, because these three terms are exactly the people long for the feelings of the drug law fit, so discuss the validity of the drug definition and classification of elements associated criminal justice system must merge observation.Drug Narcotics Endangerment Prevention Act definition can not only on behalf of the legislators negative evaluation of drugs based on historical episode, it is more important to drug definitions and grading standards belong to the legislative mandate administrative decision "whether" and "how to" control the standard of specific substances . "Principle of legality" to dominate the field of criminal law, the legislative mandate is often the major issues. Moreover, the administrative authorities based on the drug defined and determined by the grading standards of drugs more whole legal regulation of all kinds of wrongdoing state unscrupulous core, therefore drug penalty authorization level is involved in the definition and grading standards issues.Criminal law, although the Law on the Protection of legal interest, the constituent elements of protection behavior free of important functions, and therefore the validity of the drug definition and classification should be cut into the discussion thus level. The purpose of this study want to verify whether the current drug definitions and grading standards through drug essentially "theory of criminal law" and "constitutional principles" under the Criminal explicit authorization, and associated definition and classification of drugs associated with "the law applicable "," legislative enactment and legislative oversight issues such as merger discussions, in order to increase the integrity of this paper.

毒品授權與定義之橫解縱剖 = The Research of the Authority and Criteria of Narcotics
魏, 志勝

毒品授權與定義之橫解縱剖 = The Research of the Authority and Criteria of Narcotics / 魏志勝撰 - [高雄市] : 撰者, 2013[民102]. - 121面 ; 圖，表格 ; 30公分.
參考書目：面109-114.
毒品定義Drug definitions

毒品授權與定義之橫解縱剖 = The Research of the Authority and Criteria of Narcotics
LDR:04961nam0a2200277 450 001 360450
005 20170214094300.0
009 360450
010 0 $b 精裝
010 0 $b 平裝
100 $a 20170214d2013 k y0chiy05 e
101 0 $a chi
102 $a tw
105 $a ak am 000yy
200 1 $a 毒品授權與定義之橫解縱剖 $d The Research of the Authority and Criteria of Narcotics $z eng $f 魏志勝撰
210 $a [高雄市] $c 撰者 $d 2013[民102]
215 0 $a 121面 $c 圖，表格 $d 30公分
300 $a 參考書目：面109-114
314 $a 指導教授：黃常仁博士
328 $a 碩士論文--國立高雄大學政治法律學系碩士班
330 $a 本文主要討論我國「毒品危害防制條例」第2條第一項的毒品定義，由於定義要素與分級要素相同，因此一併討論定義及分級標準的妥當性問題。不過所謂的妥當性的問題並非可單獨由毒品本身觀察，因單獨就毒品觀察定義要素之「成癮性」、「濫用性」及「社會危害性」，直覺上並不會感覺不妥，因為這三個名詞恰好與人民長久對於毒品的法感情相契合，因此討論毒品定義與分級要素的妥當性必須與其相關的刑法制度合併觀察。在毒品危害防制條例中毒品定義不能僅代表立法者基於歷史情節對毒品的負面評價，更重要的是毒品定義及分級標準屬於立法授權行政決定「是否」及「如何」管制特定物質的標準。在「罪刑法定原則」主宰的刑法領域，立法授權往往是重大議題，況且行政機關依據毒品定義及分級標準所決定的毒品更是整部法律規制各類不法行為態樣的不法核心，因此毒品定義及分級標準所涉及的層面是刑罰授權議題。刑法雖為法益保護法，但構成要件具有保障行為自由的重要機能，因此毒品定義及分級的妥當性應該是由此層面切入討論。本文研究目的希望透過「毒品本質」、「刑法理論」及「憲法原則」驗證現行毒品定義及分級標準是否違反「刑法授權明確性」，並且連帶就毒品定義及分級相關聯的「法律適用」、「立法制定」及「立法監督」等議題合併討論，以期增加本論文的完整性。 This article focuses on China's "Drug Prevention Ordinance 2 drugs definition, the defining elements of the same ranking factor be discussed the validity of the definition and grading standards. However, the validity problem is not available separately observed by the drug itself, separate drug observe the defining elements of "addiction", "abuse" and "harmful to society, intuition does not feel wrong, because these three terms are exactly the people long for the feelings of the drug law fit, so discuss the validity of the drug definition and classification of elements associated criminal justice system must merge observation.Drug Narcotics Endangerment Prevention Act definition can not only on behalf of the legislators negative evaluation of drugs based on historical episode, it is more important to drug definitions and grading standards belong to the legislative mandate administrative decision "whether" and "how to" control the standard of specific substances . "Principle of legality" to dominate the field of criminal law, the legislative mandate is often the major issues. Moreover, the administrative authorities based on the drug defined and determined by the grading standards of drugs more whole legal regulation of all kinds of wrongdoing state unscrupulous core, therefore drug penalty authorization level is involved in the definition and grading standards issues.Criminal law, although the Law on the Protection of legal interest, the constituent elements of protection behavior free of important functions, and therefore the validity of the drug definition and classification should be cut into the discussion thus level. The purpose of this study want to verify whether the current drug definitions and grading standards through drug essentially "theory of criminal law" and "constitutional principles" under the Criminal explicit authorization, and associated definition and classification of drugs associated with "the law applicable "," legislative enactment and legislative oversight issues such as merger discussions, in order to increase the integrity of this paper.
510 1 $a The Research of the Authority and Criteria of Narcotics $z eng
610 0 $a 毒品定義 $a 事實變更 $a 危險概念 $a 管制類似物執行法 $a 新興毒品 $a 授權明確性界限 $a 麻醉藥品法 $a 管制物質法
610 1 $a Drug definitions $a facts change $a the notion of risk $a control analogue Enforcement Act $a emerging drugs $a explicit authorization boundaries $a narcotics law $a controlled substances act
681 $a 008M/0019 $b 382101 2647 $v 2007年版
700 1 $a 魏 $b 志勝 $4 撰 $3 592856
712 0 2 $a 國立高雄大學 $b 政治法律學系碩士班 $3 166052
801 0 $a tw $b NUK $c 20130306 $g CCR
856 7 $z 電子資源 $2 http $u http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/47110743188467134228