國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

區段徵收之公益性及必要性的實證研究 = Empirical resear...

國立高雄大學創意設計與建築學系碩士班

區段徵收之公益性及必要性的實證研究 = Empirical research on public interest and necessity of Zone expropriation : 以高雄市鳳山農業區為例; Case study of Fengshan, Kaohsiung farm land

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : 單行本
並列題名:	Empirical research on public interest and necessity of Zone expropriation
副題名:	以高雄市鳳山農業區為例
作者:	蘇榆婷,
其他團體作者:	國立高雄大學
出版地:	[高雄市]
出版者:	撰者;
出版年:	2013[民102]
面頁冊數:	[161]面圖，表 : 30公分;
標題:	公益性
標題:	Public Interest
電子資源:	http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/50062043322274093550
附註:	107年4月10日公開
附註:	含參考書目
其他題名:	以高雄市鳳山農業區為例
摘要註:	從中科四期到苗栗大埔等土地徵收抗爭事件，社會各界嚴重關切「土地正義」原則。為落實保障人民居住權、財產權以及生存權等保障，內政部於民國100年1月8日頒行「土地徵收需辦理公益性及必要性評估」規定，由於目前尚屬草創階段，該如何行動才可確實保障利害關係人之權益，遂引發本研究動機。本研究以高雄市鳳山區農業區整體開發及區段徵收之範圍為界，探討公益性及必要性評估是否能如立法意旨保障民眾之權益，並提出建議修正公益性及必要性規範。應用調節理論與政權理論、交易成本理論、理性選擇理論及社會影響評估理論，透過田園調查、問卷訪談與舉辦說明會方式綜合分析本研究範圍內的土地所有權人權益保障情形以及反映所關切的意見。分析結果顯示本研究範圍內土地所有權人85%以上非以務農為生，基於理性選擇多傾向能使土地增加利益價值的開發，故對於以區段徵收方式辦理開發表示認同與支持。其主要爭議在於土地領回比例、土地分配位置和弱勢戶與違章工廠的安置、遷移等問題。結論顯示公益性及必要性評估確實可促進土地所有權人的權益保障，且對症下藥提出修正方針，但對於其他非土地所有權身分者的保障及開發後的安置監督行動略顯不足，尚有修正空間。 The protests of land expropriation in Changhua and Miaoli were induced social great concern in the Land Justice principle. For the people's right of residence, property rights, and the right to life can be ensured, the Ministry of the Interior enacted the regulation "land expropriation must be executed for the Public Interest & Necessity Assessment" in January 8, 2011. How to act for ensuring the rights of stakeholders triggers the motivation for my study. The study area is the agricultural district in Kaohsiung Fengshan. The purpose of this study were to investigate whether Public Interest & Necessity Assessment can be sure protect people's rights and interests, and propose correct suggestion. The study review the theory of Regulation, Regime, Transaction Cost, Rational Choice and Social Impact Assessment and using fieldwork, questionnaire interviews and explanation meeting. Then the rights of land owners are discussed and analysed to find out their opinion of rights protection and concerning topics. The results show that more than 85% land owners are non-farming for a living. They expect to increase the land value and support the zone expropriation. The main point of contention is that the land to reclaim the proportion, the location of the land distribution and vulnerable households with illegal factories placement and migration. The conclusions of my study are Public Interest and Necessity Assessment indeed could promote the protection of the interests of the land owners and propose amendments to guidelines. To the other stakeholders, we still consider and protect their rights and resettlement.

區段徵收之公益性及必要性的實證研究 = Empirical research on public interest and necessity of Zone expropriation : 以高雄市鳳山農業區為例; Case study of Fengshan, Kaohsiung farm land
蘇, 榆婷

區段徵收之公益性及必要性的實證研究 = Empirical research on public interest and necessity of Zone expropriation : 以高雄市鳳山農業區為例 / 蘇榆婷撰 - [高雄市] : 撰者, 2013[民102]. - [161]面 ; 圖，表 ; 30公分.
107年4月10日公開含參考書目.
公益性Public Interest

區段徵收之公益性及必要性的實證研究 = Empirical research on public interest and necessity of Zone expropriation : 以高雄市鳳山農業區為例; Case study of Fengshan, Kaohsiung farm land
LDR:04427nam0a2200289 450 001 360460
005 20180331144515.0
010 0 $b 精裝
010 0 $b 平裝
100 $a 20130306d2013 k y0chiy50 e
101 1 $a chi $d chi $d eng
102 $a tw
105 $a ak am 000yy
200 1 $a 區段徵收之公益性及必要性的實證研究 $e 以高雄市鳳山農業區為例 $d Empirical research on public interest and necessity of Zone expropriation $e Case study of Fengshan, Kaohsiung farm land $z eng $f 蘇榆婷撰
210 $a [高雄市] $c 撰者 $d 2013[民102]
215 0 $a [161]面 $c 圖，表 $d 30公分
300 $a 107年4月10日公開
300 $a 含參考書目
314 $a 指導教授：吳文彥教授，陳啟仁教授
328 $a 碩士論文--國立高雄大學創意設計與建築學系碩士班
330 $a 從中科四期到苗栗大埔等土地徵收抗爭事件，社會各界嚴重關切「土地正義」原則。為落實保障人民居住權、財產權以及生存權等保障，內政部於民國100年1月8日頒行「土地徵收需辦理公益性及必要性評估」規定，由於目前尚屬草創階段，該如何行動才可確實保障利害關係人之權益，遂引發本研究動機。本研究以高雄市鳳山區農業區整體開發及區段徵收之範圍為界，探討公益性及必要性評估是否能如立法意旨保障民眾之權益，並提出建議修正公益性及必要性規範。應用調節理論與政權理論、交易成本理論、理性選擇理論及社會影響評估理論，透過田園調查、問卷訪談與舉辦說明會方式綜合分析本研究範圍內的土地所有權人權益保障情形以及反映所關切的意見。分析結果顯示本研究範圍內土地所有權人85%以上非以務農為生，基於理性選擇多傾向能使土地增加利益價值的開發，故對於以區段徵收方式辦理開發表示認同與支持。其主要爭議在於土地領回比例、土地分配位置和弱勢戶與違章工廠的安置、遷移等問題。結論顯示公益性及必要性評估確實可促進土地所有權人的權益保障，且對症下藥提出修正方針，但對於其他非土地所有權身分者的保障及開發後的安置監督行動略顯不足，尚有修正空間。 The protests of land expropriation in Changhua and Miaoli were induced social great concern in the Land Justice principle. For the people's right of residence, property rights, and the right to life can be ensured, the Ministry of the Interior enacted the regulation "land expropriation must be executed for the Public Interest & Necessity Assessment" in January 8, 2011. How to act for ensuring the rights of stakeholders triggers the motivation for my study. The study area is the agricultural district in Kaohsiung Fengshan. The purpose of this study were to investigate whether Public Interest & Necessity Assessment can be sure protect people's rights and interests, and propose correct suggestion. The study review the theory of Regulation, Regime, Transaction Cost, Rational Choice and Social Impact Assessment and using fieldwork, questionnaire interviews and explanation meeting. Then the rights of land owners are discussed and analysed to find out their opinion of rights protection and concerning topics. The results show that more than 85% land owners are non-farming for a living. They expect to increase the land value and support the zone expropriation. The main point of contention is that the land to reclaim the proportion, the location of the land distribution and vulnerable households with illegal factories placement and migration. The conclusions of my study are Public Interest and Necessity Assessment indeed could promote the protection of the interests of the land owners and propose amendments to guidelines. To the other stakeholders, we still consider and protect their rights and resettlement.
510 1 $a Empirical research on public interest and necessity of Zone expropriation $e Case study of Fengshan, Kaohsiung farm land $z eng
517 1 $a 以高雄市鳳山農業區為例 $z chi
610 0 $a 公益性 $a 必要性 $a 區段徵收 $a 社會影響評估
610 1 $a Public Interest $a Necessity $a Zone Expropriation $a Social Impact Assessment
681 $a 008M/0019 $b 582204 4444 $v 2007年版
700 1 $a 蘇 $b 榆婷 $4 撰 $3 592865
712 0 2 $a 國立高雄大學 $b 創意設計與建築學系碩士班 $3 592867
801 0 $a tw $b NUK $c 20130306 $g CCR
856 7 $z 電子資源 $2 http $u http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/50062043322274093550