國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Science-based lawmaking: Effective i...

Avgerinopoulou, Dionysia-Theodora.

Science-based lawmaking: Effective integration of science in international environmental law .

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Science-based lawmaking: Effective integration of science in international environmental law .
作者:	Avgerinopoulou, Dionysia-Theodora.
面頁冊數:	714 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 73-03, Section: A, page: 1169.
附註:	Adviser: Petros C. Mavroidis.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International73-03A.
標題:	Environmental Law.
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3481208
ISBN:	9781124988160

Science-based lawmaking: Effective integration of science in international environmental law .
Avgerinopoulou, Dionysia-Theodora.

Science-based lawmaking: Effective integration of science in international environmental law . - 714 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 73-03, Section: A, page: 1169.

Thesis (J.S.D.)--Columbia University, 2011.

The Thesis takes the approach of a critique of the current international environmental lawmaking processes and the systemic shortcomings and aims to redesign parts of the international environmental lawmaking system on new terms. Through case studies and doctrinal analyses, an array of initial questions guides the research through a variety of factors influencing the International Environmental Law. The Thesis mainly tests and finds the following hypotheses positive; some of the decisive factors that would create an optimized lawmaking framework and advance the purposes of I.E.L. include, but are not limited to, the adoption of: (a) progressive voting processes, including the majority rule and opting-out procedures as means of adopting primary and, most importantly, secondary legislation resulting in legally binding rules upon the States without requiring prior ratification by the states within the framework of International Organizations or Multilateral Environmental Agreements; (b) science-based secondary legislation, defined by specific criteria and boundaries that primary laws pose on them, that is more detailed than primary laws and of a more technical nature, promulgated by expert bodies alone, without the intervention of political bodies, and is binding upon States, unless the latter object with reason; and (c) new procedural rules, related to the pre- and post-lawmaking stages that enhance participation in the lawmaking process by both experts and the public and review the implementation, compliance and validity of science and technology of the laws, while at the same time guarantee all forms of legitimacy. The Thesis does not aim to produce a countervailing lawmaking model. It rather attempts to optimize some of the lawmaking processes based on an enhanced science-base in order to better protect our global natural environment and public health.

ISBN: 9781124988160Subjects--Topical Terms:

278481
Environmental Law.

Science-based lawmaking: Effective integration of science in international environmental law .
LDR:02805nmm 2200277 4500 001 380634
005 20130530092707.5
008 130708s2011 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781124988160
035 $a (UMI)AAI3481208
035 $a AAI3481208
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Avgerinopoulou, Dionysia-Theodora. $3 603208
245 1 0 $a Science-based lawmaking: Effective integration of science in international environmental law .
300 $a 714 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 73-03, Section: A, page: 1169.
500 $a Adviser: Petros C. Mavroidis.
502 $a Thesis (J.S.D.)--Columbia University, 2011.
520 $a The Thesis takes the approach of a critique of the current international environmental lawmaking processes and the systemic shortcomings and aims to redesign parts of the international environmental lawmaking system on new terms. Through case studies and doctrinal analyses, an array of initial questions guides the research through a variety of factors influencing the International Environmental Law. The Thesis mainly tests and finds the following hypotheses positive; some of the decisive factors that would create an optimized lawmaking framework and advance the purposes of I.E.L. include, but are not limited to, the adoption of: (a) progressive voting processes, including the majority rule and opting-out procedures as means of adopting primary and, most importantly, secondary legislation resulting in legally binding rules upon the States without requiring prior ratification by the states within the framework of International Organizations or Multilateral Environmental Agreements; (b) science-based secondary legislation, defined by specific criteria and boundaries that primary laws pose on them, that is more detailed than primary laws and of a more technical nature, promulgated by expert bodies alone, without the intervention of political bodies, and is binding upon States, unless the latter object with reason; and (c) new procedural rules, related to the pre- and post-lawmaking stages that enhance participation in the lawmaking process by both experts and the public and review the implementation, compliance and validity of science and technology of the laws, while at the same time guarantee all forms of legitimacy. The Thesis does not aim to produce a countervailing lawmaking model. It rather attempts to optimize some of the lawmaking processes based on an enhanced science-base in order to better protect our global natural environment and public health.
590 $a School code: 0054.
650 4 $a Environmental Law. $3 278481
650 4 $a Political Science, International Law and Relations. $3 212542
690 $a 0439
690 $a 0616
710 2 $a Columbia University. $b Law. $3 603134
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 73-03A.
790 1 0 $a Mavroidis, Petros C., $e advisor
790 $a 0054
791 $a J.S.D.
792 $a 2011
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3481208