國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Gifts or Rights? A Legal History of ...

Shilton, Elizabeth Jean.

Gifts or Rights? A Legal History of Employment Pension Plans in Canada.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Gifts or Rights? A Legal History of Employment Pension Plans in Canada.
作者:	Shilton, Elizabeth Jean.
面頁冊數:	443 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 73-04, Section: A, page: 1539.
附註:	Adviser: Kerry Rittich.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International73-04A.
標題:	History, Canadian.
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=NR77724
ISBN:	9780494777244

Gifts or Rights? A Legal History of Employment Pension Plans in Canada.
Shilton, Elizabeth Jean.

Gifts or Rights? A Legal History of Employment Pension Plans in Canada. - 443 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 73-04, Section: A, page: 1539.

Thesis (S.J.D.)--University of Toronto (Canada), 2011.

This thesis explores the role played by law in the current breakdown of the employment pension system, focusing on the legal status of pension plans within the employment relationship, and on the way lawmakers have defined, shaped and enforced employee pension rights. It traces the legal status of employment pensions from their 19th Century characterization as gifts to reward employees for long and faithful service, to their current 21st Century construction as terms of the contract of employment. The thesis argues that Canadian lawmakers within all three legal regimes structuring rights and obligations within the employment relationship -- the common law, collective bargaining law and statute law -- have contributed significantly to the overall dysfunction of the system by cultivating both substantive and procedural legal rules that locate critical issues concerning the scope, design, durability and distribution of employee pension rights within the control of employers. Predictably, Canadian employers have used that control to shape pension plans to meet their distinct business needs, needs that frequently collide with worker needs and expectations for good pensions. Even in the heyday of the 'Fordist' work structures that fostered employment pension plans, the system delivered benefits very unequally, privileging the interest of elite workers who fit the 'male breadwinner' mould, and failing to provide adequate and secure pensions for the majority of Canadian workers. Changes in the organization of work in Canada, including trends towards more precarious work, will continue to exacerbate the problems inherent in the system, escalating its distributional inequalities. In the current round of pension law reform, Canada's policy makers should abandon the effort to repair a system which is flawed at its core, and should instead seek a new foundation for pensions outside the employment relationship, a foundation which will not subordinate the pension interests of workers to the business interests of employers.

ISBN: 9780494777244Subjects--Topical Terms:

603212
History, Canadian.

Gifts or Rights? A Legal History of Employment Pension Plans in Canada.
LDR:02957nmm 2200289 4500 001 380636
005 20130530092708.5
008 130708s2011 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780494777244
035 $a (UMI)AAINR77724
035 $a AAINR77724
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Shilton, Elizabeth Jean. $3 603210
245 1 0 $a Gifts or Rights? A Legal History of Employment Pension Plans in Canada.
300 $a 443 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 73-04, Section: A, page: 1539.
500 $a Adviser: Kerry Rittich.
502 $a Thesis (S.J.D.)--University of Toronto (Canada), 2011.
520 $a This thesis explores the role played by law in the current breakdown of the employment pension system, focusing on the legal status of pension plans within the employment relationship, and on the way lawmakers have defined, shaped and enforced employee pension rights. It traces the legal status of employment pensions from their 19th Century characterization as gifts to reward employees for long and faithful service, to their current 21st Century construction as terms of the contract of employment. The thesis argues that Canadian lawmakers within all three legal regimes structuring rights and obligations within the employment relationship -- the common law, collective bargaining law and statute law -- have contributed significantly to the overall dysfunction of the system by cultivating both substantive and procedural legal rules that locate critical issues concerning the scope, design, durability and distribution of employee pension rights within the control of employers. Predictably, Canadian employers have used that control to shape pension plans to meet their distinct business needs, needs that frequently collide with worker needs and expectations for good pensions. Even in the heyday of the 'Fordist' work structures that fostered employment pension plans, the system delivered benefits very unequally, privileging the interest of elite workers who fit the 'male breadwinner' mould, and failing to provide adequate and secure pensions for the majority of Canadian workers. Changes in the organization of work in Canada, including trends towards more precarious work, will continue to exacerbate the problems inherent in the system, escalating its distributional inequalities. In the current round of pension law reform, Canada's policy makers should abandon the effort to repair a system which is flawed at its core, and should instead seek a new foundation for pensions outside the employment relationship, a foundation which will not subordinate the pension interests of workers to the business interests of employers.
590 $a School code: 0779.
650 4 $a History, Canadian. $3 603212
650 4 $a Law. $3 207600
650 4 $a Sociology, Industrial and Labor Relations. $3 212661
690 $a 0334
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0629
710 2 $a University of Toronto (Canada). $b Law. $3 603211
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 73-04A.
790 1 0 $a Rittich, Kerry, $e advisor
790 $a 0779
791 $a S.J.D.
792 $a 2011
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=NR77724