國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

住宅需求的價格、所得、利率彈性 = Price, Income and ...

國立高雄大學金融管理學系碩士班

住宅需求的價格、所得、利率彈性 = Price, Income and Interest Rate Elasticity of Demand for Housing

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : 單行本
並列題名:	Price, Income and Interest Rate Elasticity of Demand for Housing
作者:	陳俊有,
其他團體作者:	國立高雄大學
出版地:	高雄市
出版者:	國立高雄大學;
出版年:	2013[民102]
面頁冊數:	68面表格 : 30公分;
標題:	投資需求
標題:	investment demand
電子資源:	https://hdl.handle.net/11296/n68tbt
附註:	107年11月1日公開
附註:	參考書目：面60-68
摘要註:	台灣從六十年代起，經濟快速成長使得人民所得也提升，在土地資源有限及所得的提升下，住宅價格隨之攀升，而在攀升的同時，住宅在生活中扮演的角色也從民生必需品轉換成兼具投資性質的投資標的。為了瞭解此一性質的改變對住宅財貨特性所造成的影響，本文從住宅需求的彈性中加以驗證。本文採用「內政部營建署100年第2季住宅需求動向調查問卷」中新購置住宅者的個體資料，依照問卷調查結果將樣本區分為自住需求樣本及投資需求樣本，並使用房價特徵模型以及對數線性模型，分別求取總樣本、自住需求樣本以及投資需求樣本之價格、所得、利率彈性。實證結果顯示，在我國的住宅市場中，住宅仍視為正常財且為必需品，而利率確實作為購屋的主要成本考量。同時，自住需求的購屋者，購屋決策會受到房屋價格及購屋者本身所得影響；而投資需求的購屋者，購屋決策只受購屋者本身之所得影響。最後，從分量迴歸的結果，我們也可以發現，在購置不同坪數之住宅時，自住需求購屋者以及投資需求購屋者的各自的考量因素也會不同。 Since 1970s, Taiwan's rapidly growth of economic had raised people's income. With the income increased and the limitation of Taiwan's land source, the housing price began raised. As the raised of housing price, housing became from a necessity to an investment good. To figure out how the change of the housing character would impact on housing market, we calculate the elasticity of Demand for Housing. Our research use the survey data of new house buyer in「Housing Demand Survey of the Second Quarter 2011」which the government calculate. According to the survey data, we separate data into consumption demand data and investment demand data. Then we use the Hedonic Price Function and log-linear model to calculate the price, income and interest rate elasticity of all samples. The empirical evidence shows that the house is a normal good further a necessity and the interest rates indeed as the major cost of housing considerations. To the consumption demand housing buyer, their own income and the house price will effects their housing decision. But to the investment demand housing buyer, their housing decision only effect by their own income. Finally, as we can find in the consequence of quantile regressions, the consumption demand buyers consider different options from investment demand buyers when buying the different square meters house.

住宅需求的價格、所得、利率彈性 = Price, Income and Interest Rate Elasticity of Demand for Housing
陳, 俊有

住宅需求的價格、所得、利率彈性 = Price, Income and Interest Rate Elasticity of Demand for Housing / 陳俊有撰 - 高雄市 : 國立高雄大學, 2013[民102]. - 68面 ; 表格 ; 30公分.
107年11月1日公開參考書目：面60-68.
投資需求investment demand

住宅需求的價格、所得、利率彈性 = Price, Income and Interest Rate Elasticity of Demand for Housing
LDR:03803nam a2200277 450 001 389572
005 20190102102554.0
010 0 $b 精裝
010 0 $b 平裝
100 $a 20130926y2013 k y0chiy50 e
101 1 $a chi $d eng $d chi
102 $a tw
105 $a k am 000yy
200 1 $a 住宅需求的價格、所得、利率彈性 $d Price, Income and Interest Rate Elasticity of Demand for Housing $z eng $f 陳俊有撰
210 $a 高雄市 $c 國立高雄大學 $d 2013[民102]
215 0 $a 68面 $c 表格 $d 30公分
300 $a 107年11月1日公開
300 $a 參考書目：面60-68
314 $a 指導教授：蔡怡純博士
328 $a 碩士論文--國立高雄大學金融管理學系碩士班
330 $a 台灣從六十年代起，經濟快速成長使得人民所得也提升，在土地資源有限及所得的提升下，住宅價格隨之攀升，而在攀升的同時，住宅在生活中扮演的角色也從民生必需品轉換成兼具投資性質的投資標的。為了瞭解此一性質的改變對住宅財貨特性所造成的影響，本文從住宅需求的彈性中加以驗證。本文採用「內政部營建署100年第2季住宅需求動向調查問卷」中新購置住宅者的個體資料，依照問卷調查結果將樣本區分為自住需求樣本及投資需求樣本，並使用房價特徵模型以及對數線性模型，分別求取總樣本、自住需求樣本以及投資需求樣本之價格、所得、利率彈性。實證結果顯示，在我國的住宅市場中，住宅仍視為正常財且為必需品，而利率確實作為購屋的主要成本考量。同時，自住需求的購屋者，購屋決策會受到房屋價格及購屋者本身所得影響；而投資需求的購屋者，購屋決策只受購屋者本身之所得影響。最後，從分量迴歸的結果，我們也可以發現，在購置不同坪數之住宅時，自住需求購屋者以及投資需求購屋者的各自的考量因素也會不同。 Since 1970s, Taiwan's rapidly growth of economic had raised people's income. With the income increased and the limitation of Taiwan's land source, the housing price began raised. As the raised of housing price, housing became from a necessity to an investment good. To figure out how the change of the housing character would impact on housing market, we calculate the elasticity of Demand for Housing. Our research use the survey data of new house buyer in「Housing Demand Survey of the Second Quarter 2011」which the government calculate. According to the survey data, we separate data into consumption demand data and investment demand data. Then we use the Hedonic Price Function and log-linear model to calculate the price, income and interest rate elasticity of all samples. The empirical evidence shows that the house is a normal good further a necessity and the interest rates indeed as the major cost of housing considerations. To the consumption demand housing buyer, their own income and the house price will effects their housing decision. But to the investment demand housing buyer, their housing decision only effect by their own income. Finally, as we can find in the consequence of quantile regressions, the consumption demand buyers consider different options from investment demand buyers when buying the different square meters house.
510 1 $a Price, Income and Interest Rate Elasticity of Demand for Housing $z eng
610 # 0 $a 投資需求 $a 自住需求 $a 價格彈性 $a 所得彈性 $a 利率彈性 $a 房價特徵模型
610 # 1 $a investment demand $a consumption demand $a price elasticity $a income elasticity $a interest rate elasticity $a hedonic price function
681 $a 008M/0019 $b 343408 7524 $v 2007年版
700 1 $a 陳 $b 俊有 $4 撰 $3 614446
712 0 2 $a 國立高雄大學 $b 金融管理學系碩士班 $3 354008
801 0 $a tw $b 國立高雄大學 $c 20181114 $g CCR
856 7 # $u https://hdl.handle.net/11296/n68tbt $z 電子資源 $2 http