國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

以無過失離婚取代過失離婚？ = Is No-Fault Divorce ...

傅郁翔

以無過失離婚取代過失離婚？ = Is No-Fault Divorce Better than Fault Divorce? An Approach from the Perspective of Economic Analysis of Law : 從法律經濟分析觀點探討離婚法之選擇

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : 單行本
並列題名:	Is No-Fault Divorce Better than Fault Divorce? An Approach from the Perspective of Economic Analysis of Law
副題名:	從法律經濟分析觀點探討離婚法之選擇
作者:	傅郁翔,
其他團體作者:	國立高雄大學
出版地:	[高雄市]
出版者:	撰者;
出版年:	2013[民102]
面頁冊數:	150面圖，表格 : 30公分;
標題:	誓約婚姻
標題:	covenant marriage
電子資源:	http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/52433597934279325258
附註:	參考書目：面131-138
附註:	102年10月31日公開
其他題名:	從法律經濟分析觀點探討離婚法之選擇
其他題名:	以無過失離婚取代過失離婚?
其他題名:	以無過失離婚取代過失離婚
摘要註:	我國離婚法的選擇，一直停留在法釋義學上的爭論，而「應當採取純粹的無過失離婚法」（pure no-fault divorce）顯然已成為我國學界主流的思想。但是，無過失離婚法對於離婚率的影響，連帶使得社會也因婚姻的破裂而出現越來越多的問題，這不禁令人懷疑，無過失離婚法真的比過失離婚法「好」嗎？對此，本文將以法律經濟分析的方式，從「效率」此一價值觀來探討此一問題。由於在現實世界中交易成本不可能為零，離婚法的變革無可避免的會使離婚率增加，則問題的焦點即應該放在何種離婚法比較有效率上。雖然透過訊號理論（theory of signaling）我們可以發現，傳統的過失離婚法較無過失離婚法更有效率，但在崇尚自由價值觀的當代環境下，想要回頭採用過失離婚法恐怕不太不可能。另外，美國這個重新以過失為基礎的誓約婚姻法（covenant marriage law），其在婚姻訊號的傳遞上，雖有被認為未必有效於無過失離婚法下的標準婚姻，但本文以為，在標準婚姻與誓約婚姻的雙軌並行下，誓約婚姻仍應會是一個較為可信的婚姻訊號。最後，如果立法者於民法第1052條第2項但書中所要表現出的意志是，「我國當前的公序良俗尚未如美國那般自由」的話，那就意味著，無過失離婚法於現階段尚不適合我國，維持當前的離婚法對我國或許才是較好且較有效率的。 The choice of divorce law in Taiwan is keeping struggling under the legal dogmatics. However, we should adopt the “pure no-fault divorce” has become the mainstream in our law field. Nevertheless, the no-fault divorce reflect the divorce rate, it also made the society become more and more problems (because broken marriage). These issues let the author re-considerate that no-fault divorce is really better than fault divorce. This article use economic analysis of law to exam which law is more efficiency, in other words, better.Firstly, owing to the transaction costs could not be zero, so the raised divorce rates which caused by the reform of divorce law is could not be avoided. Moreover, the issue should focus on which divorce law is more efficient. Although we can see the traditional fault divorce law is more efficient than no-fault divorce law through the theory of signaling, but it is feared that it can not be possible to re-adopt the fault divorce law in the modern liberal climate. Additionally, the United States adopt the covenant marriage law which base on the fault again, although this is thought may not be more efficient than standard marriage, which is governed by no-fault divorce law, on the signaling function. The author, however, think that the covenant marriage would still be a more effective signal under the two-tiered marriages of standard marriage and covenant marriage. Lastly, if legislator supposed to express the purpose of proviso in Paragraph 2, Article 1052 of ROC Civil Code: "the public policy is not liberal like United States," it means that no-fault divorce is not suitable in Taiwan yet. Instead, to maintain the current divorce law may be better and more efficient to our country.

以無過失離婚取代過失離婚？ = Is No-Fault Divorce Better than Fault Divorce? An Approach from the Perspective of Economic Analysis of Law : 從法律經濟分析觀點探討離婚法之選擇
傅, 郁翔

以無過失離婚取代過失離婚？ = Is No-Fault Divorce Better than Fault Divorce? An Approach from the Perspective of Economic Analysis of Law : 從法律經濟分析觀點探討離婚法之選擇 / 傅郁翔撰 - [高雄市] : 撰者, 2013[民102]. - 150面 ; 圖，表格 ; 30公分.
參考書目：面131-138102年10月31日公開.
誓約婚姻covenant marriage

以無過失離婚取代過失離婚？ = Is No-Fault Divorce Better than Fault Divorce? An Approach from the Perspective of Economic Analysis of Law : 從法律經濟分析觀點探討離婚法之選擇
LDR:04819nam0a2200325 450 001 389579
005 20170214090955.0
009 389579
010 0 $b 精裝
010 0 $b 平裝
100 $a 20170214d2013 k y0chiy05 e
101 1 $a chi $d chi $d eng
102 $a tw
105 $a ak am 000yy
200 1 $a 以無過失離婚取代過失離婚？ $e 從法律經濟分析觀點探討離婚法之選擇 $d Is No-Fault Divorce Better than Fault Divorce? An Approach from the Perspective of Economic Analysis of Law $z eng $f 傅郁翔撰
210 $a [高雄市] $c 撰者 $d 2013[民102]
215 0 $a 150面 $c 圖，表格 $d 30公分
300 $a 參考書目：面131-138
300 $a 102年10月31日公開
314 $a 指導教授：呂麗慧博士
328 $a 碩士論文--國立高雄大學政治法律學系碩士班
330 $a 我國離婚法的選擇，一直停留在法釋義學上的爭論，而「應當採取純粹的無過失離婚法」（pure no-fault divorce）顯然已成為我國學界主流的思想。但是，無過失離婚法對於離婚率的影響，連帶使得社會也因婚姻的破裂而出現越來越多的問題，這不禁令人懷疑，無過失離婚法真的比過失離婚法「好」嗎？對此，本文將以法律經濟分析的方式，從「效率」此一價值觀來探討此一問題。由於在現實世界中交易成本不可能為零，離婚法的變革無可避免的會使離婚率增加，則問題的焦點即應該放在何種離婚法比較有效率上。雖然透過訊號理論（theory of signaling）我們可以發現，傳統的過失離婚法較無過失離婚法更有效率，但在崇尚自由價值觀的當代環境下，想要回頭採用過失離婚法恐怕不太不可能。另外，美國這個重新以過失為基礎的誓約婚姻法（covenant marriage law），其在婚姻訊號的傳遞上，雖有被認為未必有效於無過失離婚法下的標準婚姻，但本文以為，在標準婚姻與誓約婚姻的雙軌並行下，誓約婚姻仍應會是一個較為可信的婚姻訊號。最後，如果立法者於民法第1052條第2項但書中所要表現出的意志是，「我國當前的公序良俗尚未如美國那般自由」的話，那就意味著，無過失離婚法於現階段尚不適合我國，維持當前的離婚法對我國或許才是較好且較有效率的。 The choice of divorce law in Taiwan is keeping struggling under the legal dogmatics. However, we should adopt the “pure no-fault divorce” has become the mainstream in our law field. Nevertheless, the no-fault divorce reflect the divorce rate, it also made the society become more and more problems (because broken marriage). These issues let the author re-considerate that no-fault divorce is really better than fault divorce. This article use economic analysis of law to exam which law is more efficiency, in other words, better.Firstly, owing to the transaction costs could not be zero, so the raised divorce rates which caused by the reform of divorce law is could not be avoided. Moreover, the issue should focus on which divorce law is more efficient. Although we can see the traditional fault divorce law is more efficient than no-fault divorce law through the theory of signaling, but it is feared that it can not be possible to re-adopt the fault divorce law in the modern liberal climate. Additionally, the United States adopt the covenant marriage law which base on the fault again, although this is thought may not be more efficient than standard marriage, which is governed by no-fault divorce law, on the signaling function. The author, however, think that the covenant marriage would still be a more effective signal under the two-tiered marriages of standard marriage and covenant marriage. Lastly, if legislator supposed to express the purpose of proviso in Paragraph 2, Article 1052 of ROC Civil Code: "the public policy is not liberal like United States," it means that no-fault divorce is not suitable in Taiwan yet. Instead, to maintain the current divorce law may be better and more efficient to our country.
510 1 $a Is No-Fault Divorce Better than Fault Divorce? An Approach from the Perspective of Economic Analysis of Law $z eng
517 1 $a 從法律經濟分析觀點探討離婚法之選擇 $z chi
517 1 $a 以無過失離婚取代過失離婚? $z chi
517 1 $a 以無過失離婚取代過失離婚 $z chi
610 0 $a 誓約婚姻 $a 訊號理論 $a 交易成本 $a 法律經濟分析 $a 過失離婚 $a 無過失離婚
610 1 $a covenant marriage $a the theory of signaling $a transaction costs $a economic analysis of law $a fault divorce $a no-fault divorce
681 $a 008M/0019 $b 382101 2348 $v 2007年版
700 1 $a 傅 $b 郁翔 $4 撰 $3 614452
712 0 2 $a 國立高雄大學 $b 政治法律學系碩士班 $3 166052
801 0 $a tw $b NUK $c 20131015 $g CCR
856 7 $z 電子資源 $2 http $u http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/52433597934279325258