國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

公民不服從作為公民社會力量展現及其法律上之評價 = Civil diso...

國立高雄大學政治法律學系碩士班

公民不服從作為公民社會力量展現及其法律上之評價 = Civil disobedience as the strength of civil society and its evaluation of law

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : 單行本
並列題名:	Civil disobedience as the strength of civil society and its evaluation of law
作者:	林育聖,
其他團體作者:	國立高雄大學
出版地:	[高雄市]
出版者:	撰者;
出版年:	2014[民103]
面頁冊數:	112面圖，表 : 30公分;
標題:	公民不服從
標題:	Civil Disobedience
電子資源:	http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/66764025884328556199
附註:	參考書目：面101-105
附註:	103年12月16日公開
摘要註:	本篇研究旨在討論公民不服從是否能成為公民社會抵抗政府不當法律與政策的力量，並在法律上對其給予評價。透過蒐集國內外有關學者對公民不服從之定義與正當性的相關文獻，並以818佔領內政部與318佔領國會行動作為分析個案。利用已整理完成之公民不服從要件結構來分析個案是否屬於公民不服從行為及其在法律上之評價。　本研究認為818佔領內政部與318佔領國會行動因符合公民不服從所需的五項要件，因此屬於公民不服從之行為。而因佔領內政部與國會行動所為之相關犯罪構成要件該當行為，屬於我國憲法所保障之言論自由與集會自由基本權範圍，故不該受到違法之評價。　本研究認為基於民主法治國家都有可能出現民主失靈的現象，因此應將公民不服從視為一種人民用於矯正國家不法的基本權利。至於公民不服從對公民社會而言，就是一種讓公民社會能夠直接參與公共政治事務的非常態性審議式民主，也是落實直接民主的一種方式。　　This paper mainly discusses whether civil disobedience can become the strength of civil society to resist improper laws and policies, and give evaluation of the law. Through to archive scholars’ research of foreign country and R.O.C., and explore literature related to civil disobedience’s definitions and legitimacy. Use these definitions and legitimacy to confirm whether 818 Ministry of the Interior occupation actions and 318 The Legislative Yuan occupation actions are civil disobedience or not, and their evaluation of the law.　　Preliminary findings, since 818 Ministry of the Interior occupation actions and 318 The Legislative Yuan occupation actions compliance with five important condition of civil disobedience, so these two actions belonging to civil disobedience. And these two actions also belong to freedom of speech and freedom of assembly protected by Constitution of the R.O.C., should not give illegal evaluation. Base on democratic countries are likely to occur democracy failure, civil disobedience should be fundamental right for people to redress improper conduct of the State. And civil disobedience can also as an informality deliberative democracy, one kind of way to implement direct democracy.

公民不服從作為公民社會力量展現及其法律上之評價 = Civil disobedience as the strength of civil society and its evaluation of law
林, 育聖

公民不服從作為公民社會力量展現及其法律上之評價 = Civil disobedience as the strength of civil society and its evaluation of law / 林育聖撰 - [高雄市] : 撰者, 2014[民103]. - 112面 ; 圖，表 ; 30公分.
參考書目：面101-105103年12月16日公開.
公民不服從Civil Disobedience

公民不服從作為公民社會力量展現及其法律上之評價 = Civil disobedience as the strength of civil society and its evaluation of law
LDR:03592nam0a2200289 450 001 430013
005 20170214090620.0
009 430013
010 0 $b 精裝
010 0 $b 平裝
100 $a 20170214d2014 k y0chiy05 e
101 1 $a chi $d chi $d eng
102 $a tw
105 $a ak am 000yy
200 1 $a 公民不服從作為公民社會力量展現及其法律上之評價 $d Civil disobedience as the strength of civil society and its evaluation of law $z eng $f 林育聖撰
210 $a [高雄市] $c 撰者 $d 2014[民103]
215 0 $a 112面 $c 圖，表 $d 30公分
300 $a 參考書目：面101-105
300 $a 103年12月16日公開
314 $a 指導教授：楊鈞池博士
328 $a 碩士論文--國立高雄大學政治法律學系碩士班
330 $a 本篇研究旨在討論公民不服從是否能成為公民社會抵抗政府不當法律與政策的力量，並在法律上對其給予評價。透過蒐集國內外有關學者對公民不服從之定義與正當性的相關文獻，並以818佔領內政部與318佔領國會行動作為分析個案。利用已整理完成之公民不服從要件結構來分析個案是否屬於公民不服從行為及其在法律上之評價。　本研究認為818佔領內政部與318佔領國會行動因符合公民不服從所需的五項要件，因此屬於公民不服從之行為。而因佔領內政部與國會行動所為之相關犯罪構成要件該當行為，屬於我國憲法所保障之言論自由與集會自由基本權範圍，故不該受到違法之評價。　本研究認為基於民主法治國家都有可能出現民主失靈的現象，因此應將公民不服從視為一種人民用於矯正國家不法的基本權利。至於公民不服從對公民社會而言，就是一種讓公民社會能夠直接參與公共政治事務的非常態性審議式民主，也是落實直接民主的一種方式。　　This paper mainly discusses whether civil disobedience can become the strength of civil society to resist improper laws and policies, and give evaluation of the law. Through to archive scholars’ research of foreign country and R.O.C., and explore literature related to civil disobedience’s definitions and legitimacy. Use these definitions and legitimacy to confirm whether 818 Ministry of the Interior occupation actions and 318 The Legislative Yuan occupation actions are civil disobedience or not, and their evaluation of the law.　　Preliminary findings, since 818 Ministry of the Interior occupation actions and 318 The Legislative Yuan occupation actions compliance with five important condition of civil disobedience, so these two actions belonging to civil disobedience. And these two actions also belong to freedom of speech and freedom of assembly protected by Constitution of the R.O.C., should not give illegal evaluation. Base on democratic countries are likely to occur democracy failure, civil disobedience should be fundamental right for people to redress improper conduct of the State. And civil disobedience can also as an informality deliberative democracy, one kind of way to implement direct democracy.
510 1 $a Civil disobedience as the strength of civil society and its evaluation of law $z eng
610 0 $a 公民不服從 $a 公民社會 $a 審議式民主 $a 民主失靈 $a 言論自由
610 1 $a Civil Disobedience $a Civil Society $a Deliberative Democracy $a Democracy Failure $a Freedom of Speech
681 $a 008M/0019 $b 382101 4401 $v 2007年版
700 1 $a 林 $b 育聖 $4 撰 $3 673251
712 0 2 $a 國立高雄大學 $b 政治法律學系碩士班 $3 166052
801 0 $a tw $b NUK $c 20141021 $g CCR
856 7 $z 電子資源 $2 http $u http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/66764025884328556199