| 摘要註: |
我國政府採購法於民國91年02月06日增訂第85-1~85-4條條文,後又於民國96年07月04日修正第85-1條條文。其目的是為健全機關與廠商之間,因履約爭議而未能達成協議者,能有合適處理履約爭議機制。故制定調解程序,以求為能迅速的解決爭議。政府採購法調解制度,主要為解決政府採購履約爭議,透過調解程序的進行,能使政府採購履約爭議,在有效迅速之下,節省時間節省爭訟費用,達到雙贏的局面。本研究採用台北地方法院、台中地方法院及高雄地方法院三處法院,實務上的判決書,將判決書的結果,依照起訴人、訴訟標的金額及獲判勝訴人等項目,做為統計分析的內容。本研究經過實證後發現履約爭議金額在新台幣200萬元以下的案件,向法院提起訴訟請求的件數,明顯的比其他等級金額的少了很多,可見200萬元以下的爭議案件已經在調解階段就已經獲得解決。由此可見,就爭執金額來看廠商與政府在200萬元以下的履約爭議案件在調解階段比較容易達成和解。然而,本研究的另一個發現,就是起訴的一造大部份是廠商,但是從判決的結果來看,廠商獲得全部勝訴的比例也比政府全部勝訴的為低。由此可見,廠商主動提出起訴的案件在法院的判決之下,勝訴的比率未見得就比較高。綜上所述,在履約爭議案件金額自200萬元以上至1億元之案件,廠商提出案件的比例較高,但獲判勝訴的比例卻是比較低。本研究的結果,可提供日後因履約爭議而與機關產生爭執的廠商參考。在該履約爭議案件發生,能盡量多使用調解制度,進行解決爭議的方法。減少用法院訴訟程序。從本研究結果來看,廠商獲判勝訴的比例是明顯較低的。本研究就政府採購法調解制度的程序規定、實體規定、實務上整體調解程序的運作,做一全面性的探討。再深入法院實際判決的統計、分析歸納,讓政府採購法調解制度與法院判決做多層面的對照比較,真實的展現政府採購法調解制度的快捷性、專業性、經濟性,能讓履約爭議的兩方得到雙贏。 Government Procurement Act has been added Article 85-1 to 85-4 on Feb 2 2002. Article 85-1 was amended and promulgated again on Jul 4 2007. The purpose of above Act amending is if the entity and the supplier failed to reach an agreement over the dispute in relation to the performance of the contract, there will be a proper mechanism to deal with the disrupt and the arbitration procedure can solve the problem rapidly. Government Procurement Law mediation system, primarily for government procurement compliance resolve the dispute through mediation program to make government procurement compliance dispute, under the effective quickly, saving time saving litigation costs, achieve a win-win situation.In this study, Taipei, Taichung and Kaohsiung three district court verdict on the practice, the result of the judgment, in accordance with the prosecutor, the subject of litigation and the amount of people in favor of other projects, as the statistical analysis of the content. the empirical study found that compliance after the amount in dispute cases NT$20 million or less, the number of lawsuits filed requests to the court, obviously a lot less than the amount of the other grades, 2 million yuan less visible disputes have been in mediation stage have been resolved. Thus, the amount of view on the dispute with the government in compliance vendor disputes 2 million yuan less than in the mediation phase is easier to reach a settlement. However, another of the study found that a prosecution is made most manufacturers, but from the results of the judgment, the manufacturers get all the winning ratio than all in favor of the government is low. Thus, the manufacturers take the initiative to prosecute cases under the Court's judgment, might not be in favor of the relatively high rate. In summary, the proportion of the amount of cases the compliance dispute the case is more than 200 million to 100 million yuan, the firm presented the case in a higher, but won the case in the proportion was lower. The results of this study may provide in the future due to compliance with the authorities dispute arose from the vendor reference. The compliance disputes occur, can use as much as possible mediation system, carry out the method of dispute resolution. Reduce by court proceedings. From the results of this study, the firm won the case the ratio is significantly lower. The study on the Government Procurement Law Program mediation system provides entity provides the practical operation of the whole mediation process, to make a comprehensive investigate. Go any further court ruling actual statistics, analyzed and summarized, the Government Procurement Law Mediation System and the court to do more compared to the control level, the real show quick government procurement law mediation system, professional, economy, allowing compliance dispute the two parties to get a win-win. |