國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

God and mental causation

Lim, Daniel.

God and mental causation

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	God and mental causationby Daniel Lim.
作者:	Lim, Daniel.
出版者:	Berlin, Heidelberg :Springer Berlin Heidelberg :2015.
面頁冊數:	xiv, 100 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
標題:	Philosophy and religion.
電子資源:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47426-6
ISBN:	9783662474266 (electronic bk.)

God and mental causation
Lim, Daniel.

God and mental causation[electronic resource] /by Daniel Lim. - Berlin, Heidelberg :Springer Berlin Heidelberg :2015. - xiv, 100 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - SpringerBriefs in philosophy,2211-4548. - SpringerBriefs in philosophy..

Chapter 1: The Supervenience Argument -- Chapter 2: Occasionalism -- Chapter 3: Overdetermination and Exclusion -- Chapter 4: The Existence of God.

This book lies at the intersection of philosophy of mind and philosophy of religion and operates on the assumption that dialogue between the two disciplines can be fruitful. In particular it focuses on how debates in the philosophy of mind regarding the nature of mental causation relate to debates in the philosophy of religion regarding divine action, creaturely causation, and existence of God. The book is divided into two parts. The first deals with Jaegwon Kim's so-called Supervenience Argument (SA) against non-reductive physicalism. One important observation is that the structural similarities between non-reductive physicalism and 'orthodox' theism make it convenient to co-opt non-reductive physicalist solutions to the SA in defending the possibility of creaturely causation in the philosophy of religion. The SA is used as a foil to discuss the relative merits of Malebranche's so-called Conservation is Continuous Creation Argument for Occasionalism (CCCA) Moverover, the so-called compatibilist strategy (Karen Bennett 2003, 2009) for developing a non-reductive physicalist response to the Supervenience Argument is defended and developed. This strategy is then deployed in the philosophy of religion to defend the possibility of creaturely causation against the CCCA.

ISBN: 9783662474266 (electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-662-47426-6doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

179102
Philosophy and religion.

LC Class. No.: BL51

Dewey Class. No.: 201.61

God and mental causation
LDR:02408nmm a2200325 a 4500 001 471510
003 DE-He213
005 20160203140531.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 160223s2015 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783662474266 (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783662474259 (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-662-47426-6 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-662-47426-6
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a BL51
072 7 $a HRAB $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PHI022000 $2 bisacsh
082 0 4 $a 201.61 $2 23
090 $a BL51 $b .L732 2015
100 1 $a Lim, Daniel. $3 726793
245 1 0 $a God and mental causation $h [electronic resource] / $c by Daniel Lim.
260 $a Berlin, Heidelberg : $b Springer Berlin Heidelberg : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2015.
300 $a xiv, 100 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a SpringerBriefs in philosophy, $x 2211-4548
505 0 $a Chapter 1: The Supervenience Argument -- Chapter 2: Occasionalism -- Chapter 3: Overdetermination and Exclusion -- Chapter 4: The Existence of God.
520 $a This book lies at the intersection of philosophy of mind and philosophy of religion and operates on the assumption that dialogue between the two disciplines can be fruitful. In particular it focuses on how debates in the philosophy of mind regarding the nature of mental causation relate to debates in the philosophy of religion regarding divine action, creaturely causation, and existence of God. The book is divided into two parts. The first deals with Jaegwon Kim's so-called Supervenience Argument (SA) against non-reductive physicalism. One important observation is that the structural similarities between non-reductive physicalism and 'orthodox' theism make it convenient to co-opt non-reductive physicalist solutions to the SA in defending the possibility of creaturely causation in the philosophy of religion. The SA is used as a foil to discuss the relative merits of Malebranche's so-called Conservation is Continuous Creation Argument for Occasionalism (CCCA) Moverover, the so-called compatibilist strategy (Karen Bennett 2003, 2009) for developing a non-reductive physicalist response to the Supervenience Argument is defended and developed. This strategy is then deployed in the philosophy of religion to defend the possibility of creaturely causation against the CCCA.
650 0 $a Philosophy and religion. $3 179102
650 0 $a Philosophy of mind. $3 178358
650 1 4 $a Philosophy. $3 176573
650 2 4 $a Philosophy of Religion. $3 275635
650 2 4 $a Religious Studies. $3 275612
650 2 4 $a Philosophy of Mind. $3 276634
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
830 0 $a SpringerBriefs in philosophy. $3 560618
856 4 0 $u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47426-6
950 $a Humanities, Social Sciences and Law (Springer-11648)