國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Pragmatics and lawpractical and theo...

Capone, Alessandro.

Pragmatics and lawpractical and theoretical perspectives /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Pragmatics and lawedited by Francesca Poggi, Alessandro Capone.
其他題名:	practical and theoretical perspectives /
其他作者:	Poggi, Francesca.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing :2017.
面頁冊數:	xiv, 476 p. :ill., digital ;25 cm.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
標題:	LawLanguage.
電子資源:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44601-1
ISBN:	9783319446011$q(electronic bk.)

Pragmatics and lawpractical and theoretical perspectives /
Pragmatics and lawpractical and theoretical perspectives /[electronic resource] :edited by Francesca Poggi, Alessandro Capone. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2017. - xiv, 476 p. :ill., digital ;25 cm. - Perspectives in pragmatics, philosophy & psychology,v.102214-3807 ;. - Perspectives in pragmatics, philosophy & psychology ;v.3..

This volume is the second part of a project which hosts an interdisciplinary discussion about the relationship among law and language, legal practice and ordinary conversation, legal philosophy and the linguistics sciences. An international group of authors, from cognitive science, philosophy of language and philosophy of law question about how legal theory and pragmatics can enrich each other. In particular, the first part is devoted to the analysis of how pragmatics can solve problems related to legal theory: What can pragmatics teach about the concept of law and its relationship with moral, and, in particular, about the eternal dispute between legal positivism and legal naturalism? What can pragmatics teach about the concept of law and/or legal disagreements? The second part is focused on legal adjudication: it aims to construct a pragmatic apparatus appropriate to legal trial and/or to test the tenure of the traditional pragmatics tools in the field. The authors face questions such as: Which interesting pragmatic features emerge from legal adjudication? What pragmatic theories are better suited to account for the practice of judgment or its particular aspects (such as the testimony or the binding force of legal precedents)? Which pragmatic and socio-linguistic problems are highlighted by this practice?

ISBN: 9783319446011$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-44601-1doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

217172
Law
--Language.

LC Class. No.: K487.L36 / P73 2017

Dewey Class. No.: 340.14

Pragmatics and lawpractical and theoretical perspectives /
LDR:02366nmm a2200313 a 4500 001 506582
003 DE-He213
005 20170725102626.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 171030s2017 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783319446011$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783319445991$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-44601-1 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-44601-1
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a K487.L36 $b P73 2017
072 7 $a CFG $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAN016000 $2 bisacsh
082 0 4 $a 340.14 $2 23
090 $a K487.L36 $b P898 2017
245 0 0 $a Pragmatics and law $h [electronic resource] : $b practical and theoretical perspectives / $c edited by Francesca Poggi, Alessandro Capone.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2017.
300 $a xiv, 476 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 25 cm.
490 1 $a Perspectives in pragmatics, philosophy & psychology, $x 2214-3807 ; $v v.10
520 $a This volume is the second part of a project which hosts an interdisciplinary discussion about the relationship among law and language, legal practice and ordinary conversation, legal philosophy and the linguistics sciences. An international group of authors, from cognitive science, philosophy of language and philosophy of law question about how legal theory and pragmatics can enrich each other. In particular, the first part is devoted to the analysis of how pragmatics can solve problems related to legal theory: What can pragmatics teach about the concept of law and its relationship with moral, and, in particular, about the eternal dispute between legal positivism and legal naturalism? What can pragmatics teach about the concept of law and/or legal disagreements? The second part is focused on legal adjudication: it aims to construct a pragmatic apparatus appropriate to legal trial and/or to test the tenure of the traditional pragmatics tools in the field. The authors face questions such as: Which interesting pragmatic features emerge from legal adjudication? What pragmatic theories are better suited to account for the practice of judgment or its particular aspects (such as the testimony or the binding force of legal precedents)? Which pragmatic and socio-linguistic problems are highlighted by this practice?
650 0 $a Law $x Language. $3 217172
650 0 $a Pragmatics. $3 177855
650 0 $a Language and languages $x Philosophy. $3 176570
650 1 4 $a Linguistics. $3 176897
650 2 4 $a Semantics. $3 177636
650 2 4 $a Philosophy of Language. $3 274774
650 2 4 $a Philosophy of Law. $3 274769
700 1 $a Poggi, Francesca. $3 748266
700 1 $a Capone, Alessandro. $3 736716
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
830 0 $a Perspectives in pragmatics, philosophy & psychology ; $v v.3. $3 678747
856 4 0 $u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44601-1
950 $a Social Sciences (Springer-41176)