國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Searching minds by scanning brainsne...

Blitz, Marc Jonathan.

Searching minds by scanning brainsneuroscience technology and constitutional privacy protection /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Searching minds by scanning brainsby Marc Jonathan Blitz.
其他題名:	neuroscience technology and constitutional privacy protection /
作者:	Blitz, Marc Jonathan.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing :2017.
面頁冊數:	vi, 144 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
標題:	NeurosciencesLaw and legislation.
電子資源:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50004-1
ISBN:	9783319500041$q(electronic bk.)

Searching minds by scanning brainsneuroscience technology and constitutional privacy protection /
Blitz, Marc Jonathan.

Searching minds by scanning brainsneuroscience technology and constitutional privacy protection /[electronic resource] :by Marc Jonathan Blitz. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2017. - vi, 144 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - Palgrave studies in law, neuroscience, and human behavior. - Palgrave studies in law, neuroscience, and human behavior..

1. Introduction -- 2. Constitutional Puzzles (and (Neuro)technological Changes -- 3. Lie Detection, Mind Reading, and Brain Reading -- 4. The Fifth Amendment: Self-Incrimination and the Brain -- 5. The Fourth (and First) Amendment -- 6. Conclusion.

This book examines the ethical and legal challenges presented by modern techniques of memory retrieval, especially within the context of potential use by the US government in courts of law. Specifically, Marc Blitz discusses the Fourth Amendment's protections against unreasonable searches and the Fifth Amendment's self-incrimination clause. He also argues that we should pay close attention to another constitutional provision that individuals generally don't think of as protecting their privacy: The First Amendment's freedom of speech. First Amendment values also protect our freedom of thought, and this--not simply our privacy--is what is at stake if government engaged in excessive monitoring of our minds. Marc Jonathan Blitz is Alan Joseph Bennett Professor of Law at Oklahoma City University, USA, and series editor of Palgrave studies in law, neuroscience, and human behavior.

ISBN: 9783319500041$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-50004-1doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

559946
Neurosciences
--Law and legislation.

LC Class. No.: RC343 / .B55 2017

Dewey Class. No.: 344.041

Searching minds by scanning brainsneuroscience technology and constitutional privacy protection /
LDR:02244nmm a2200337 a 4500 001 508746
003 DE-He213
005 20170318085455.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 171121s2017 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783319500041$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783319500034$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-50004-1 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-50004-1
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a RC343 $b .B55 2017
072 7 $a JMK $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PSY003000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a LAW041000 $2 bisacsh
082 0 4 $a 344.041 $2 23
090 $a RC343 $b .B649 2017
100 1 $a Blitz, Marc Jonathan. $3 775109
245 1 0 $a Searching minds by scanning brains $h [electronic resource] : $b neuroscience technology and constitutional privacy protection / $c by Marc Jonathan Blitz.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan, $c 2017.
300 $a vi, 144 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Palgrave studies in law, neuroscience, and human behavior
505 0 $a 1. Introduction -- 2. Constitutional Puzzles (and (Neuro)technological Changes -- 3. Lie Detection, Mind Reading, and Brain Reading -- 4. The Fifth Amendment: Self-Incrimination and the Brain -- 5. The Fourth (and First) Amendment -- 6. Conclusion.
520 $a This book examines the ethical and legal challenges presented by modern techniques of memory retrieval, especially within the context of potential use by the US government in courts of law. Specifically, Marc Blitz discusses the Fourth Amendment's protections against unreasonable searches and the Fifth Amendment's self-incrimination clause. He also argues that we should pay close attention to another constitutional provision that individuals generally don't think of as protecting their privacy: The First Amendment's freedom of speech. First Amendment values also protect our freedom of thought, and this--not simply our privacy--is what is at stake if government engaged in excessive monitoring of our minds. Marc Jonathan Blitz is Alan Joseph Bennett Professor of Law at Oklahoma City University, USA, and series editor of Palgrave studies in law, neuroscience, and human behavior.
650 0 $a Neurosciences $x Law and legislation. $3 559946
650 0 $a Neurosciences $x Moral and ethical aspects. $3 570858
650 0 $a Privacy, Right of. $3 206659
650 1 4 $a Psychology. $3 181533
650 2 4 $a Law and Psychology. $3 274225
650 2 4 $a Psychosocial Studies. $3 775111
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
830 0 $a Palgrave studies in law, neuroscience, and human behavior. $3 775110
856 4 0 $u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50004-1
950 $a Behavioral Science and Psychology (Springer-41168)