國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Understanding and investigating resp...

Hubley, Anita M.

Understanding and investigating response processes in validation research

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Understanding and investigating response processes in validation researchedited by Bruno D. Zumbo, Anita M. Hubley.
其他作者:	Zumbo, Bruno D.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing :2017.
面頁冊數:	xiii, 370 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
標題:	ResearchEvaluation.
電子資源:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56129-5
ISBN:	9783319561295$q(electronic bk.)

Understanding and investigating response processes in validation research
Understanding and investigating response processes in validation research[electronic resource] /edited by Bruno D. Zumbo, Anita M. Hubley. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2017. - xiii, 370 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - Social indicators research series,v.691387-6570 ;. - Social indicators research series ;v.47..

This volume addresses an urgent need across multiple disciplines to broaden our understanding and use of response processes evidence of test validity. It builds on the themes and findings of the volume Validity and Validation in Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences (Zumbo & Chan, 2014), with a focus on measurement validity evidence based on response processes. Approximately 1000 studies are published each year examining the validity of inferences made from tests and measures in the social, behavioural, and health sciences. The widely accepted Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (1999, 2014) present five sources of evidence for validity: content-related, response processes, internal structure, relationships with other variables, and consequences of testing. Many studies focus on internal structure and relationships with other variables sources of evidence, which have a long history in validation research, known methodologies, and numerous exemplars in the literature. Far less is understood by test users and researchers conducting validation work about how to think about and apply new and emerging sources of validity evidence. This groundbreaking volume is the first to present conceptual models of response processes, methodological issues that arise in gathering response processes evidence, as well as applications and exemplars for providing response processes evidence in validation work.

ISBN: 9783319561295$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-56129-5doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

249042
Research
--Evaluation.

LC Class. No.: Q180.55.E9 / U53 2017

Dewey Class. No.: 001.4

Understanding and investigating response processes in validation research
LDR:02463nmm a2200313 a 4500 001 515534
003 DE-He213
005 20170524101812.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 180126s2017 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783319561295$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783319561288$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-56129-5 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-56129-5
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a Q180.55.E9 $b U53 2017
072 7 $a JHBC $2 bicssc
072 7 $a SOC019000 $2 bisacsh
082 0 4 $a 001.4 $2 23
090 $a Q180.55.E9 $b U55 2017
245 0 0 $a Understanding and investigating response processes in validation research $h [electronic resource] / $c edited by Bruno D. Zumbo, Anita M. Hubley.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2017.
300 $a xiii, 370 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Social indicators research series, $x 1387-6570 ; $v v.69
520 $a This volume addresses an urgent need across multiple disciplines to broaden our understanding and use of response processes evidence of test validity. It builds on the themes and findings of the volume Validity and Validation in Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences (Zumbo & Chan, 2014), with a focus on measurement validity evidence based on response processes. Approximately 1000 studies are published each year examining the validity of inferences made from tests and measures in the social, behavioural, and health sciences. The widely accepted Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (1999, 2014) present five sources of evidence for validity: content-related, response processes, internal structure, relationships with other variables, and consequences of testing. Many studies focus on internal structure and relationships with other variables sources of evidence, which have a long history in validation research, known methodologies, and numerous exemplars in the literature. Far less is understood by test users and researchers conducting validation work about how to think about and apply new and emerging sources of validity evidence. This groundbreaking volume is the first to present conceptual models of response processes, methodological issues that arise in gathering response processes evidence, as well as applications and exemplars for providing response processes evidence in validation work.
650 0 $a Research $x Evaluation. $3 249042
650 0 $a Scholarly publishing $x Research. $3 700163
650 1 4 $a Social Sciences. $3 278901
650 2 4 $a Methodology of the Social Sciences. $3 275266
650 2 4 $a Psychological Methods/Evaluation. $3 275095
650 2 4 $a Statistics for Social Science, Behavorial Science, Education, Public Policy, and Law. $3 274394
650 2 4 $a Assessment, Testing and Evaluation. $3 274753
650 2 4 $a Quality of Life Research. $3 274757
700 1 $a Zumbo, Bruno D. $3 700161
700 1 $a Hubley, Anita M. $3 786041
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
830 0 $a Social indicators research series ; $v v.47. $3 558238
856 4 0 $u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56129-5
950 $a Social Sciences (Springer-41176)