國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Commonsense pluralism about truthan ...

SpringerLink (Online service)

Commonsense pluralism about truthan empirical defence /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Commonsense pluralism about truthby Joseph Ulatowski.
其他題名:	an empirical defence /
作者:	Ulatowski, Joseph.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing :2017.
面頁冊數:	xxv, 140 p. :ill., digital ;22 cm.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
標題:	Truth.
電子資源:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69465-8
ISBN:	9783319694658$q(electronic bk.)

Commonsense pluralism about truthan empirical defence /
Ulatowski, Joseph.

Commonsense pluralism about truthan empirical defence /[electronic resource] :by Joseph Ulatowski. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2017. - xxv, 140 p. :ill., digital ;22 cm.

Chapter 1: Introduction -- Chapter 2: On the "Common Conception" of Truth -- Chapter 3: A Defence of Descriptive Metaphysics -- Chapter 4: An Ecological Approach in Experimental Philosophy -- Chapter 5: Commonsense Pluralism about Truth (Endoxic Alethic Pluralism) Chapter 6: Challenging Endoxic Alethic Pluralism.

Truth is a pervasive feature of ordinary language, deserving of systematic study, and few theorists of truth have endeavoured to chronicle the tousled conceptual terrain forming the non-philosopher's ordinary view. In this book, the author recasts the philosophical treatment of truth in light of historical and recent work in experimental philosophy. He argues that the commonsense view of truth is deeply fragmented along two axes, across different linguistic discourses and among different demographics, termed in the book as endoxic alethic pluralism. To defend this view, four conclusions must be reached: (1) endoxic alethic pluralism should be compatible with how the everyday person uses truth, (2) the common conception of truth should be derivable from empirical data, (3) this descriptive metaphysical project is one aspect of a normative theory of truth, and (4) endoxic alethic pluralism is at least partially immune to challenges facing the ecological method in experimental philosophy and alethic pluralism.

ISBN: 9783319694658$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-69465-8doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

177865
Truth.

LC Class. No.: BD171 / .U38 2017

Dewey Class. No.: 121

Commonsense pluralism about truthan empirical defence /
LDR:02312nmm a2200325 a 4500 001 525431
003 DE-He213
005 20180530111139.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 180904s2017 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783319694658$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783319694641$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-69465-8 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-69465-8
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a BD171 $b .U38 2017
072 7 $a CFA $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PHI021000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a LAN000000 $2 bisacsh
082 0 4 $a 121 $2 23
090 $a BD171 $b .U36 2017
100 1 $a Ulatowski, Joseph. $3 797728
245 1 0 $a Commonsense pluralism about truth $h [electronic resource] : $b an empirical defence / $c by Joseph Ulatowski.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan, $c 2017.
300 $a xxv, 140 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 22 cm.
505 0 $a Chapter 1: Introduction -- Chapter 2: On the "Common Conception" of Truth -- Chapter 3: A Defence of Descriptive Metaphysics -- Chapter 4: An Ecological Approach in Experimental Philosophy -- Chapter 5: Commonsense Pluralism about Truth (Endoxic Alethic Pluralism) Chapter 6: Challenging Endoxic Alethic Pluralism.
520 $a Truth is a pervasive feature of ordinary language, deserving of systematic study, and few theorists of truth have endeavoured to chronicle the tousled conceptual terrain forming the non-philosopher's ordinary view. In this book, the author recasts the philosophical treatment of truth in light of historical and recent work in experimental philosophy. He argues that the commonsense view of truth is deeply fragmented along two axes, across different linguistic discourses and among different demographics, termed in the book as endoxic alethic pluralism. To defend this view, four conclusions must be reached: (1) endoxic alethic pluralism should be compatible with how the everyday person uses truth, (2) the common conception of truth should be derivable from empirical data, (3) this descriptive metaphysical project is one aspect of a normative theory of truth, and (4) endoxic alethic pluralism is at least partially immune to challenges facing the ecological method in experimental philosophy and alethic pluralism.
650 0 $a Truth. $3 177865
650 0 $a Pluralism. $2 itrt $3 267963
650 1 4 $a Philosophy. $3 176573
650 2 4 $a Philosophy of Language. $3 274774
650 2 4 $a Metaphysics. $3 228630
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
856 4 0 $u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69465-8
950 $a Religion and Philosophy (Springer-41175)