國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Public confidence in criminal justic...

SpringerLink (Online service)

Public confidence in criminal justicea history and critique /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Public confidence in criminal justiceby Elizabeth R. Turner.
其他題名:	a history and critique /
作者:	Turner, Elizabeth R.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing :2018.
面頁冊數:	xiii, 135 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
標題:	Judicial processGreat Britain.
電子資源:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67897-9
ISBN:	9783319678979$q(electronic bk.)

Public confidence in criminal justicea history and critique /
Turner, Elizabeth R.

Public confidence in criminal justicea history and critique /[electronic resource] :by Elizabeth R. Turner. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2018. - xiii, 135 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - Critical criminological perspectives. - Critical criminological perspectives..

In this book, Liz Turner argues that survey methods have gained an unwarranted and unhealthy level of dominance when it comes to understanding how the public views the criminal justice system. The focus on measuring public confidence in criminal justice by researchers, politicians and criminal justice agencies has tended to prioritise the production of quantitative representations of general opinions, at the expense of more specific, qualitative or deliberative approaches. This has occurred not due to any inherent methodological superiority of survey-based approaches, but due to the congruence of the survey-based, general measure of opinion with the prevailing neoliberal political tendency to engage with citizens as consumers. By identifying the historical conditions on which contemporary knowledge claims rest, and tracing the political power struggles out of which sprang the idea of public confidence in criminal justice as a real and measurable object, Turner shows that things could be otherwise. She also draws attention to the ways in which survey researchers have asserted their dominance over other approaches, suppressing convincing claims by advocates of deliberative methods that a better politics of crime and justice is possible. Ultimately, Turner concludes, researchers need to be more upfront about their political objectives, and more alert to the political responsibilities that go along with the making of knowledge claims. Providing a provocative critique of the dominant approaches to measuring public confidence, this timely study will be of special interest to scholars of the criminal justice system, research methods, and British politics.

ISBN: 9783319678979$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-67897-9doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

398811
Judicial process
--Great Britain.

LC Class. No.: KD7285

Dewey Class. No.: 347.41014

Public confidence in criminal justicea history and critique /
LDR:02593nmm a2200289 a 4500 001 530055
003 DE-He213
005 20180813142736.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 181107s2018 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783319678979$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783319678962$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-67897-9 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-67897-9
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a KD7285
082 0 4 $a 347.41014 $2 23
090 $a KD7285 $b .T945 2018
100 1 $a Turner, Elizabeth R. $3 803626
245 1 0 $a Public confidence in criminal justice $h [electronic resource] : $b a history and critique / $c by Elizabeth R. Turner.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan, $c 2018.
300 $a xiii, 135 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Critical criminological perspectives
520 $a In this book, Liz Turner argues that survey methods have gained an unwarranted and unhealthy level of dominance when it comes to understanding how the public views the criminal justice system. The focus on measuring public confidence in criminal justice by researchers, politicians and criminal justice agencies has tended to prioritise the production of quantitative representations of general opinions, at the expense of more specific, qualitative or deliberative approaches. This has occurred not due to any inherent methodological superiority of survey-based approaches, but due to the congruence of the survey-based, general measure of opinion with the prevailing neoliberal political tendency to engage with citizens as consumers. By identifying the historical conditions on which contemporary knowledge claims rest, and tracing the political power struggles out of which sprang the idea of public confidence in criminal justice as a real and measurable object, Turner shows that things could be otherwise. She also draws attention to the ways in which survey researchers have asserted their dominance over other approaches, suppressing convincing claims by advocates of deliberative methods that a better politics of crime and justice is possible. Ultimately, Turner concludes, researchers need to be more upfront about their political objectives, and more alert to the political responsibilities that go along with the making of knowledge claims. Providing a provocative critique of the dominant approaches to measuring public confidence, this timely study will be of special interest to scholars of the criminal justice system, research methods, and British politics.
650 0 $a Judicial process $z Great Britain. $3 398811
650 1 4 $a Criminology and Criminal Justice. $3 760160
650 2 4 $a Criminal Justice. $3 787102
650 2 4 $a Crime and the Media. $3 774178
650 2 4 $a Crime and Society. $3 739880
650 2 4 $a Research Methods in Criminology. $3 803627
650 2 4 $a Public Policy. $3 224661
650 2 4 $a British Politics. $3 742442
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
830 0 $a Critical criminological perspectives. $3 645851
856 4 0 $u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67897-9
950 $a Law and Criminology (Springer-41177)