國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Democratic acceptance of spatial pla...

Pleger, Lyn Ellen.

Democratic acceptance of spatial planning policy measures

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Democratic acceptance of spatial planning policy measuresby Lyn Ellen Pleger.
作者:	Pleger, Lyn Ellen.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing :2019.
面頁冊數:	xvi, 205 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
標題:	City planningCase studies.Switzerland
電子資源:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90878-6
ISBN:	9783319908786$q(electronic bk.)

Democratic acceptance of spatial planning policy measures
Pleger, Lyn Ellen.

Democratic acceptance of spatial planning policy measures[electronic resource] /by Lyn Ellen Pleger. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2019. - xvi, 205 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.

Introduction -- Sustainable Spatial Planning in Democracies -- Democratic Acceptance of Spatial Planning Policies -- Determinants of Democratic Acceptance: A Two-Level Analysis -- The Motivation behind Democratic Acceptance: A Case Study -- Framing Effects on Democratic Acceptability: An Experimental Approach -- Discussion -- Conclusions.

This book examines the democratic acceptance of spatial planning measures, using Switzerland as a case study. The currently inefficient land use in industrialised countries calls for new spatial planning policies. Yet governments have largely failed to implement innovative policy measures, which may be due to a lack of democratic acceptance. To date, little is known about the democratic acceptance of spatial planning measures. Switzerland offers a promising candidate because of its direct-democratic system, which allows citizens' preferences for specific policy measures to be directly measured. In this work, the democratic acceptance of spatial planning instruments is investigated from various perspectives in the form of original empirical studies, which are embedded in an innovative conceptual framework. It demonstrates that not only spatial planning instruments in general, but also incentive-based instruments in particular, generally enjoy high acceptance. This finding is remarkable, considering the fact that efficient land use instruments have only been marginally implemented. Addressing the needs of both academics and land use practitioners in the private and public sector, the book shows that in order to improve the democratic acceptance of spatial planning measures, attention must be paid to their context, content and the means by which that content is provided.

ISBN: 9783319908786$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-90878-6doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

830047
City planning
--Switzerland--Case studies.

LC Class. No.: HT169.S9

Dewey Class. No.: 307.121609494

Democratic acceptance of spatial planning policy measures
LDR:02717nmm a2200325 a 4500 001 550268
003 DE-He213
005 20180617021222.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 191004s2019 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783319908786$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783319908779$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-90878-6 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-90878-6
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a HT169.S9
072 7 $a RP $2 bicssc
072 7 $a POL002000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a POL026000 $2 bisacsh
082 0 4 $a 307.121609494 $2 23
090 $a HT169.S9 $b P724 2019
100 1 $a Pleger, Lyn Ellen. $3 830046
245 1 0 $a Democratic acceptance of spatial planning policy measures $h [electronic resource] / $c by Lyn Ellen Pleger.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2019.
300 $a xvi, 205 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
505 0 $a Introduction -- Sustainable Spatial Planning in Democracies -- Democratic Acceptance of Spatial Planning Policies -- Determinants of Democratic Acceptance: A Two-Level Analysis -- The Motivation behind Democratic Acceptance: A Case Study -- Framing Effects on Democratic Acceptability: An Experimental Approach -- Discussion -- Conclusions.
520 $a This book examines the democratic acceptance of spatial planning measures, using Switzerland as a case study. The currently inefficient land use in industrialised countries calls for new spatial planning policies. Yet governments have largely failed to implement innovative policy measures, which may be due to a lack of democratic acceptance. To date, little is known about the democratic acceptance of spatial planning measures. Switzerland offers a promising candidate because of its direct-democratic system, which allows citizens' preferences for specific policy measures to be directly measured. In this work, the democratic acceptance of spatial planning instruments is investigated from various perspectives in the form of original empirical studies, which are embedded in an innovative conceptual framework. It demonstrates that not only spatial planning instruments in general, but also incentive-based instruments in particular, generally enjoy high acceptance. This finding is remarkable, considering the fact that efficient land use instruments have only been marginally implemented. Addressing the needs of both academics and land use practitioners in the private and public sector, the book shows that in order to improve the democratic acceptance of spatial planning measures, attention must be paid to their context, content and the means by which that content is provided.
650 0 $a City planning $z Switzerland $v Case studies. $3 830047
650 1 4 $a Geography. $3 174760
650 2 4 $a Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning. $3 274401
650 2 4 $a Political Science. $3 274226
650 2 4 $a Environmental Politics. $3 740166
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
856 4 0 $u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90878-6
950 $a Earth and Environmental Science (Springer-11646)