國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Risk Assessment Tools and Mental Hea...

Crabtree, Taryn S.

Risk Assessment Tools and Mental Health Courts: Preliminary Findings.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Risk Assessment Tools and Mental Health Courts: Preliminary Findings.
作者:	Crabtree, Taryn S.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019
面頁冊數:	177 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-05, Section: A.
附註:	Advisor: Dickie, Ida.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International81-05A.
標題:	Clinical psychology.
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27545193
ISBN:	9781392717691

Risk Assessment Tools and Mental Health Courts: Preliminary Findings.
Crabtree, Taryn S.

Risk Assessment Tools and Mental Health Courts: Preliminary Findings. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 177 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-05, Section: A.

Thesis (Psy.D.)--Spalding University, 2019.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The use of incarceration as a response to criminal behavior committed by individuals with mental health problems has proven to be largely ineffective. As a result, Mental Health Courts (MHCs) have developed as an alternative to incarceration and have recently begun to explore how to use risk assessment to guide treatment and case management services for offenders with mental health issues, including substance abuse. However, the process of using risk assessment to determine which individuals are best suited to participate in MHCs is still in its infancy. Although several types of risk assessment exist, it is not clear which types are most beneficial for guiding the case management, supervision, and treatment needs of offenders with mental health problems. To develop a risk profile of the participants in a sample in a Midwest MHC, the current study used three different types of risk assessment tools: 1) the Level of Service Inventory-Revised (LSI-R) (actuarial); 2) Inventory of Offender Risk, Needs, and Strengths (IORNS) (self-report); and 3) Historical-Clinical Risk Management-20, Version 3 (HCR-20 V3) (structured professional guidelines). Outcome variables included recidivism over a 6 month and 1 year period, whereas recidivism is defined as a new arrest, incarceration, or conviction (Honegger, 2015), and intermediate recidivism, which is defined as any program violation incurred during participation in the MHC program. Overall, results of this study suggest clinician-rated tools, such as actuarial and structured professional judgment tools, were most effective at predicting overall recidivism. However, self-report instruments appear to be more effective at predicting the number of charges across recidivism events. Therefore, both types of risk assessment appear to have utility and provide valuable information. Further recommendations are offered for other uses of risk assessment in MHCs, including reduction of recidivism by targeting specific criminogenic risk factors in addition to traditional mental health treatment.

ISBN: 9781392717691Subjects--Topical Terms:

328102
Clinical psychology.

Risk Assessment Tools and Mental Health Courts: Preliminary Findings.
LDR:03072nmm a2200325 4500 001 570815
005 20200514112006.5
008 200901s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781392717691
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI27545193
035 $a AAI27545193
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Crabtree, Taryn S. $3 857537
245 1 0 $a Risk Assessment Tools and Mental Health Courts: Preliminary Findings.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 177 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-05, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Dickie, Ida.
502 $a Thesis (Psy.D.)--Spalding University, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The use of incarceration as a response to criminal behavior committed by individuals with mental health problems has proven to be largely ineffective. As a result, Mental Health Courts (MHCs) have developed as an alternative to incarceration and have recently begun to explore how to use risk assessment to guide treatment and case management services for offenders with mental health issues, including substance abuse. However, the process of using risk assessment to determine which individuals are best suited to participate in MHCs is still in its infancy. Although several types of risk assessment exist, it is not clear which types are most beneficial for guiding the case management, supervision, and treatment needs of offenders with mental health problems. To develop a risk profile of the participants in a sample in a Midwest MHC, the current study used three different types of risk assessment tools: 1) the Level of Service Inventory-Revised (LSI-R) (actuarial); 2) Inventory of Offender Risk, Needs, and Strengths (IORNS) (self-report); and 3) Historical-Clinical Risk Management-20, Version 3 (HCR-20 V3) (structured professional guidelines). Outcome variables included recidivism over a 6 month and 1 year period, whereas recidivism is defined as a new arrest, incarceration, or conviction (Honegger, 2015), and intermediate recidivism, which is defined as any program violation incurred during participation in the MHC program. Overall, results of this study suggest clinician-rated tools, such as actuarial and structured professional judgment tools, were most effective at predicting overall recidivism. However, self-report instruments appear to be more effective at predicting the number of charges across recidivism events. Therefore, both types of risk assessment appear to have utility and provide valuable information. Further recommendations are offered for other uses of risk assessment in MHCs, including reduction of recidivism by targeting specific criminogenic risk factors in addition to traditional mental health treatment.
590 $a School code: 0965.
650 4 $a Clinical psychology. $3 328102
650 4 $a Law. $3 207600
650 4 $a Mental health. $3 292985
650 4 $a Criminology. $3 190212
690 $a 0622
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0347
690 $a 0627
710 2 $a Spalding University. $b Professional Psychology. $3 857538
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 81-05A.
790 $a 0965
791 $a Psy.D.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27545193