國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The decline ofpublic access and neo-...

Caterino, Brian.

The decline ofpublic access and neo-liberal media regimes

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The decline ofpublic access and neo-liberal media regimesby Brian Caterino.
作者:	Caterino, Brian.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing :2020.
面頁冊數:	viii, 280 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
標題:	Public-access television.
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39403-5
ISBN:	9783030394035$q(electronic bk.)

The decline ofpublic access and neo-liberal media regimes
Caterino, Brian.

The decline ofpublic access and neo-liberal media regimes[electronic resource] /by Brian Caterino. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2020. - viii, 280 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.

1. Public Access in Decline -- 2. The Frankfurt School and its Aftermath -- 3. Public Interest Standards from Radio to Public Television -- 4. The Emergence of Public Access Television -- 5. Neo-liberalism the Public Sphere and the Decline of Public Obligation -- 6. Access Under Attack: Some Examples -- 7. Looking Through the Wrong End of the Telescope: Internet Democracy vs Public Access -- 8. A Future for Public Access?.

This book examines the reasons behind the declining fortunes of public access channels. Public access, which provided perhaps the boldest experiment in popular media democracy, is in steep decline. While some have argued it is technologically outmoded, Caterino argues that the real reason lies with the rise of a neo-liberal media regime. This regime creates a climate in which we can understand these changes. This book considers the role of neo-liberalism in transforming notions of public obligations and regulation of media that have impacted non-profit media, specifically public access. Neo-liberalism has tried to eliminate public forums and public discourse and weakens institutions of civil society. Though social media is often championed as an arena of communicative freedom, Caterino argues that neo-liberalism has created a colonized social media environment that severely limits popular democracy.

ISBN: 9783030394035$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-39403-5doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

858917
Public-access television.

LC Class. No.: HE8700.7 / .C384 2020

Dewey Class. No.: 791.45

The decline ofpublic access and neo-liberal media regimes
LDR:02329nmm a2200325 a 4500 001 572045
003 DE-He213
005 20200817154731.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 200922s2020 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783030394035$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783030394028$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-39403-5 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-39403-5
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a HE8700.7 $b .C384 2020
072 7 $a JFD $2 bicssc
072 7 $a SOC052000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a JBCT $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 791.45 $2 23
090 $a HE8700.7 $b .C359 2020
100 1 $a Caterino, Brian. $3 305156
245 1 4 $a The decline ofpublic access and neo-liberal media regimes $h [electronic resource] / $c by Brian Caterino.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan, $c 2020.
300 $a viii, 280 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
505 0 $a 1. Public Access in Decline -- 2. The Frankfurt School and its Aftermath -- 3. Public Interest Standards from Radio to Public Television -- 4. The Emergence of Public Access Television -- 5. Neo-liberalism the Public Sphere and the Decline of Public Obligation -- 6. Access Under Attack: Some Examples -- 7. Looking Through the Wrong End of the Telescope: Internet Democracy vs Public Access -- 8. A Future for Public Access?.
520 $a This book examines the reasons behind the declining fortunes of public access channels. Public access, which provided perhaps the boldest experiment in popular media democracy, is in steep decline. While some have argued it is technologically outmoded, Caterino argues that the real reason lies with the rise of a neo-liberal media regime. This regime creates a climate in which we can understand these changes. This book considers the role of neo-liberalism in transforming notions of public obligations and regulation of media that have impacted non-profit media, specifically public access. Neo-liberalism has tried to eliminate public forums and public discourse and weakens institutions of civil society. Though social media is often championed as an arena of communicative freedom, Caterino argues that neo-liberalism has created a colonized social media environment that severely limits popular democracy.
650 0 $a Public-access television. $3 858917
650 0 $a Public radio. $3 858918
650 1 4 $a Media Policy. $3 773208
650 2 4 $a Media and Communication. $3 742407
650 2 4 $a Cultural Policy and Politics. $3 760266
650 2 4 $a Media Management. $3 305903
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39403-5
950 $a Literature, Cultural and Media Studies (Springer-41173)