國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The relativity of theoryKey position...

Mizrahi, Moti.

The relativity of theoryKey positions and arguments in the contemporary scientific realism/antirealism debate /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The relativity of theoryby Moti Mizrahi.
其他題名:	Key positions and arguments in the contemporary scientific realism/antirealism debate /
作者:	Mizrahi, Moti.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing :2020.
面頁冊數:	viii, 171 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	Realism.
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58047-6
ISBN:	9783030580476$q(electronic bk.)

The relativity of theoryKey positions and arguments in the contemporary scientific realism/antirealism debate /
Mizrahi, Moti.

The relativity of theoryKey positions and arguments in the contemporary scientific realism/antirealism debate /[electronic resource] :by Moti Mizrahi. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2020. - viii, 171 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - Synthese library: studies in epistemology, logic, methodology, and philosophy of science,v.4310166-6991 ;. - Synthese library ;v.344..

Preface -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Realism versus Antirealism in Contemporary Philosophy of Science -- 3. Key Positions in the Contemporary Scientific Realism/Antirealism Debate -- 4. Key Arguments for Scientific Realism -- 5. Key Arguments against Scientific Realism -- 5.1. The "Graveyard" Argument -- 6. Relative Realism: The Best of Both Worlds -- Glossary -- Index.

This book offers a close and rigorous examination of the arguments for and against scientific realism and introduces key positions in the scientific realism/antirealism debate, which is one of the central debates in contemporary philosophy of science. On the one hand, scientific realists argue that we have good reasons to believe that our best scientific theories are approximately true because, if they were not even approximately true, they would not be able to explain and predict natural phenomena with such impressive accuracy. On the other hand, antirealists argue that the success of science does not warrant belief in the approximate truth of our best scientific theories. This is because the history of science is a graveyard of theories that were once successful but were later discarded. The author eventually settles on a middle-ground position between scientific realism and antirealism called "relative realism".

ISBN: 9783030580476$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-58047-6doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

174751
Realism.

LC Class. No.: Q175.32.R42 / M597 2020

Dewey Class. No.: 501

The relativity of theoryKey positions and arguments in the contemporary scientific realism/antirealism debate /
LDR:02464nmm a2200337 a 4500 001 586427
003 DE-He213
005 20210201131846.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 210323s2020 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783030580476$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783030580469$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-58047-6 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-58047-6
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a Q175.32.R42 $b M597 2020
072 7 $a PDA $2 bicssc
072 7 $a SCI075000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a PDA $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 501 $2 23
090 $a Q175.32.R42 $b M685 2020
100 1 $a Mizrahi, Moti. $3 877856
245 1 4 $a The relativity of theory $h [electronic resource] : $b Key positions and arguments in the contemporary scientific realism/antirealism debate / $c by Moti Mizrahi.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2020.
300 $a viii, 171 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Synthese library: studies in epistemology, logic, methodology, and philosophy of science, $x 0166-6991 ; $v v.431
505 0 $a Preface -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Realism versus Antirealism in Contemporary Philosophy of Science -- 3. Key Positions in the Contemporary Scientific Realism/Antirealism Debate -- 4. Key Arguments for Scientific Realism -- 5. Key Arguments against Scientific Realism -- 5.1. The "Graveyard" Argument -- 6. Relative Realism: The Best of Both Worlds -- Glossary -- Index.
520 $a This book offers a close and rigorous examination of the arguments for and against scientific realism and introduces key positions in the scientific realism/antirealism debate, which is one of the central debates in contemporary philosophy of science. On the one hand, scientific realists argue that we have good reasons to believe that our best scientific theories are approximately true because, if they were not even approximately true, they would not be able to explain and predict natural phenomena with such impressive accuracy. On the other hand, antirealists argue that the success of science does not warrant belief in the approximate truth of our best scientific theories. This is because the history of science is a graveyard of theories that were once successful but were later discarded. The author eventually settles on a middle-ground position between scientific realism and antirealism called "relative realism".
650 0 $a Realism. $3 174751
650 0 $a Anti-realism. $3 756212
650 0 $a Science $x Philosophy. $3 179415
650 1 4 $a Philosophy of Science. $3 277156
650 2 4 $a History and Philosophical Foundations of Physics. $3 376851
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
830 0 $a Synthese library ; $v v.344. $3 593365
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58047-6
950 $a Religion and Philosophy (SpringerNature-41175)