國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Theory of legal evidenceevidence in ...

Dybowski, Maciej.

Theory of legal evidenceevidence in legal theory /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Theory of legal evidenceedited by Verena Klappstein, Maciej Dybowski.
其他題名:	evidence in legal theory /
其他作者:	Klappstein, Verena.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing :2021.
面頁冊數:	vi, 276 p. :ill. (some col.), digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	Evidence (Law)Philosophy.
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83841-6
ISBN:	9783030838416$q(electronic bk.)

Theory of legal evidenceevidence in legal theory /
Theory of legal evidenceevidence in legal theory /[electronic resource] :edited by Verena Klappstein, Maciej Dybowski. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2021. - vi, 276 p. :ill. (some col.), digital ;24 cm. - Law and philosophy library,v. 1382215-0315 ;. - Law and philosophy library ;v.99..

Olivier Leclerc, Can there be a science of proof? A Cross-Atlantic dialogue (1898-1947) -- Maciej Dybowski, A Good Enough (Meta) Theory of Evidence in Law. An Inferentialist Account -- Weronika Dziegielewska, Why Are We Bound by Evidence? On The Normative Stance of Legal Proof -- Bohdan Pretkiel, Rethinking expert opinion evidence as an argument from epistemic authority -- Margarida Lacombe Camargo, Constitutional Evidence -- Giovanni Tuzet, Testimony and Hearsay -- Marcin Romanowicz, Neuroscientific Evidence in Courtroom: Clash of Two Anthropological Paradigms -- John R. Harris, An Epistemic Defense of Exclusionary Rules in the Criminal Justice System -- Adam Dyrda and Maciej Prochnicki, Expert's (Meta)Testimony: An Epistemological Perspective -- Daniela Accatino, The Architecture of Evidential Justification between Atomism and Holism.

This book addresses theoretical problems concerning legal evidence. The concept of evidence is expected to fulfill a number of distinct roles in science and philosophy, but also in legal theory and law, some of which are complementary, while others are conflicting. In their profession, lawyers have to deal with evidence and proof. Yet the legal concept of evidence is constantly changing, and the debate concerning the distinction between a legal concept of evidence, the ordinary concept of evidence and the concept of evidence in science is far from being settled. What is more, the problem of evidence is central to both epistemology and the philosophy of science, and by extension to our academic thinking on law. In short, legal theorists' interest in evidence may include such diverse objects as a bloody knife, sensory data, linguistic entities or psychologically recognized beliefs. The book surveys selected theoretical roles that the concept of evidence plays and explores their relations and interconnections. The content is divided into three parts, investigating: (1) evidence in epistemology and the philosophy of science, which focuses on evidence methodologies and the problem of proof in legal scholarship; (2) evidence in legal theory and legal philosophy, where particular attention is paid to the interplay between evidence, legal reasoning and the binding force of such reasoning; and (3) evidence in law, where theoretical problems pertaining to witnesses, expert opinions, explanations of the accused, statistical evidence and neuroscientific evidence are examined.

ISBN: 9783030838416$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-83841-6doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

511291
Evidence (Law)
--Philosophy.

LC Class. No.: K2261 / .T54 2021

Dewey Class. No.: 347.06

Theory of legal evidenceevidence in legal theory /
LDR:03511nmm a2200337 a 4500 001 612371
003 DE-He213
005 20220103190607.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 220526s2021 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783030838416$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783030838409$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-83841-6 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-83841-6
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a K2261 $b .T54 2021
072 7 $a LAB $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAW079000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a LAB $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 347.06 $2 23
090 $a K2261 $b .T396 2021
245 0 0 $a Theory of legal evidence $h [electronic resource] : $b evidence in legal theory / $c edited by Verena Klappstein, Maciej Dybowski.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2021.
300 $a vi, 276 p. : $b ill. (some col.), digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Law and philosophy library, $x 2215-0315 ; $v v. 138
505 0 $a Olivier Leclerc, Can there be a science of proof? A Cross-Atlantic dialogue (1898-1947) -- Maciej Dybowski, A Good Enough (Meta) Theory of Evidence in Law. An Inferentialist Account -- Weronika Dziegielewska, Why Are We Bound by Evidence? On The Normative Stance of Legal Proof -- Bohdan Pretkiel, Rethinking expert opinion evidence as an argument from epistemic authority -- Margarida Lacombe Camargo, Constitutional Evidence -- Giovanni Tuzet, Testimony and Hearsay -- Marcin Romanowicz, Neuroscientific Evidence in Courtroom: Clash of Two Anthropological Paradigms -- John R. Harris, An Epistemic Defense of Exclusionary Rules in the Criminal Justice System -- Adam Dyrda and Maciej Prochnicki, Expert's (Meta)Testimony: An Epistemological Perspective -- Daniela Accatino, The Architecture of Evidential Justification between Atomism and Holism.
520 $a This book addresses theoretical problems concerning legal evidence. The concept of evidence is expected to fulfill a number of distinct roles in science and philosophy, but also in legal theory and law, some of which are complementary, while others are conflicting. In their profession, lawyers have to deal with evidence and proof. Yet the legal concept of evidence is constantly changing, and the debate concerning the distinction between a legal concept of evidence, the ordinary concept of evidence and the concept of evidence in science is far from being settled. What is more, the problem of evidence is central to both epistemology and the philosophy of science, and by extension to our academic thinking on law. In short, legal theorists' interest in evidence may include such diverse objects as a bloody knife, sensory data, linguistic entities or psychologically recognized beliefs. The book surveys selected theoretical roles that the concept of evidence plays and explores their relations and interconnections. The content is divided into three parts, investigating: (1) evidence in epistemology and the philosophy of science, which focuses on evidence methodologies and the problem of proof in legal scholarship; (2) evidence in legal theory and legal philosophy, where particular attention is paid to the interplay between evidence, legal reasoning and the binding force of such reasoning; and (3) evidence in law, where theoretical problems pertaining to witnesses, expert opinions, explanations of the accused, statistical evidence and neuroscientific evidence are examined.
650 0 $a Evidence (Law) $x Philosophy. $3 511291
650 1 4 $a Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History. $3 557741
700 1 $a Klappstein, Verena. $3 815045
700 1 $a Dybowski, Maciej. $3 815046
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
830 0 $a Law and philosophy library ; $v v.99. $3 567448
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83841-6
950 $a Law and Criminology (SpringerNature-41177)