國立高雄大學圖資館 |

登入

回首頁

Philosophy and neurosciencea methodological analysis /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Philosophy and neuroscienceby Steven S. Gouveia.
其他題名:	a methodological analysis /
作者:	Gouveia, Steven S.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing :2022.
面頁冊數:	xiv, 313 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	NeurosciencesPhilosophy.
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95369-0
ISBN:	9783030953690$q(electronic bk.)

Philosophy and neurosciencea methodological analysis /
Gouveia, Steven S.

Philosophy and neurosciencea methodological analysis /[electronic resource] :by Steven S. Gouveia. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2022. - xiv, 313 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - New directions in philosophy and cognitive science. - New directions in philosophy and cognitive science..

Chapter 1 - Methodological Problem in Philosophy and Neuroscience -- Chapter 2 - Methodological Isolationism -- Chapter 3 - Reductive Neurophilosophy -- Chapter 4 - Neurophenomenology -- Chapter 5 - Non-Reductive Neurophilosophy -- Chapter 6 - Qualia and Information in Philosophy and Neuroscience -- Conclusion.

This book explores the methodological strategies for linking philosophy and neuroscience concerning the study of the conscious brain. The author focuses on four distinct methods for relating these two academic disciplines: isolationist, reductionist, neurophenomenological, and non-reductionist. After analyzing the pros and cons of these approaches, Steven S. Gouveia applies them to the concept of Qualia and Information to understand how the metaphilosophical assumptions of each approach influence the definitions of those specific concepts. Gouveia argues for an approach that conceives the interdisciplinarity of both philosophy and neuroscience, in a particular and sound methodology, offering empirical examples of the explanatory power of this methodology over the others. Additionally, he shows how the metaphilosophical assumptions of each methodology-usually taken by researchers implicitly and unconsciously-influence their own approach to the methodological problem. Steven S. Gouveia is a Post Doctoral Research Fellow at the Mind, Brain Imaging and Neuroethics Unit of the Royal Institute of Mental Health, University of Ottawa, Canada.

ISBN: 9783030953690$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-95369-0doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

292903
Neurosciences
--Philosophy.

LC Class. No.: QP356

Dewey Class. No.: 612.801

Philosophy and neurosciencea methodological analysis /
LDR:02503nmm a2200337 a 4500 001 621742
003 DE-He213
005 20220411065549.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 221121s2022 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783030953690$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783030953683$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-95369-0 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-95369-0
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a QP356
072 7 $a HPM $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PHI015000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a QDTM $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 612.801 $2 23
090 $a QP356 $b .G719 2022
100 1 $a Gouveia, Steven S. $3 923152
245 1 0 $a Philosophy and neuroscience $h [electronic resource] : $b a methodological analysis / $c by Steven S. Gouveia.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan, $c 2022.
300 $a xiv, 313 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a New directions in philosophy and cognitive science
505 0 $a Chapter 1 - Methodological Problem in Philosophy and Neuroscience -- Chapter 2 - Methodological Isolationism -- Chapter 3 - Reductive Neurophilosophy -- Chapter 4 - Neurophenomenology -- Chapter 5 - Non-Reductive Neurophilosophy -- Chapter 6 - Qualia and Information in Philosophy and Neuroscience -- Conclusion.
520 $a This book explores the methodological strategies for linking philosophy and neuroscience concerning the study of the conscious brain. The author focuses on four distinct methods for relating these two academic disciplines: isolationist, reductionist, neurophenomenological, and non-reductionist. After analyzing the pros and cons of these approaches, Steven S. Gouveia applies them to the concept of Qualia and Information to understand how the metaphilosophical assumptions of each approach influence the definitions of those specific concepts. Gouveia argues for an approach that conceives the interdisciplinarity of both philosophy and neuroscience, in a particular and sound methodology, offering empirical examples of the explanatory power of this methodology over the others. Additionally, he shows how the metaphilosophical assumptions of each methodology-usually taken by researchers implicitly and unconsciously-influence their own approach to the methodological problem. Steven S. Gouveia is a Post Doctoral Research Fellow at the Mind, Brain Imaging and Neuroethics Unit of the Royal Institute of Mental Health, University of Ottawa, Canada.
650 0 $a Neurosciences $x Philosophy. $3 292903
650 1 4 $a Philosophy of Mind. $3 276634
650 2 4 $a Epistemology. $3 275100
650 2 4 $a Cognitive Neuroscience. $3 846308
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
830 0 $a New directions in philosophy and cognitive science. $3 565857
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95369-0
950 $a Religion and Philosophy (SpringerNature-41175)