國立高雄大學圖資館 |

Juris et de Jure: Reintegrating Law and Public Administration.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Juris et de Jure: Reintegrating Law and Public Administration.
作者:	Osorio, Andrew.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2022
面頁冊數:	195 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-03, Section: A.
附註:	Advisor: O'Leary, Rosemary.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-03A.
標題:	Public administration.
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29255066
ISBN:	9798351409979

Juris et de Jure: Reintegrating Law and Public Administration.
Osorio, Andrew.

Juris et de Jure: Reintegrating Law and Public Administration. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2022 - 195 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-03, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Kansas, 2022.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The legal foundation of American public administration is oft overlooked within the academic literature of the field. The absence of a cohesive research agenda on law and administration represents not only a major theoretical shortcoming but also a growing rift between the increasingly legalized practice of public administration and the re-search aims of a supposedly applied social science. One aspect of the remedy for these failings is a renewed engagement with academic fields occupied by questions of law and legal institutions. Therefore, ae explained in the introduction, the overarching purpose of this dissertation is to (1) analyze the ways in which law and courts affect governance when studied through the prism of public administration and legal scholarship and (2) demonstrate, through three distinct studies, the questions, theories, research settings, and methods that comprise an interdisciplinary approach to these fields.The lead study provides the first systematic and substantive assessment of Moe & Gilmour’s (1995, p. 135) assertion that “public administration has largely abandoned or forgotten its roots in public law-in the Constitution, statutes, and case law”. This work seeks a better sense of the subject matter, thematic concepts, and research settings within the public administration scholarship on law in order to assess the extent of the interdisciplinary effort necessary to reintegrate the fields. To do so, a sample taken from five generalist journals of public administration is analyzed via textual analysis to assess the last 20 years of mainstream public administration literature, exploring the extent to which law and public administration have integrated theoretically.The second study explores the effect of institutional design on the legitimacy of the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court by asking whether the plenary appointment power of the Chief Justice of the United States has resulted in an ideologically biased court. Measures of judicial ideology and statistical analyses are used to ex-amine whether judges appointed to this court are more likely to be conservative than the average federal judge. Beyond the immediate implications concerning the court’s oversight of our national security apparatus, this study furthers understanding of institutional design and judicial legitimacy as well as the chief justice’s role as an administrative actor in contexts beyond the Supreme Court, a function overlooked by the cur-rent literature.In the third piece, the tax expenditure of charitable giving to nonprofits is examined as a policy from (1) the administrative perspective of efficiency and effectiveness as a tool for providing public goods (using a meta-analysis of peer-reviewed studies to examine how government agency grants affect private donations to nonprofits) and (2) an historical vantage as a reflection of the organic sociolegal development of American public policy towards the taxation of charitable giving. This study is timely because during national crises—such as the current pandemic—nonprofits provide essential services and emergency assistance. However, despite their importance the question of how best to fund nonprofits remains unanswered. More broadly, one of the largest challenges for policymakers and public administrators is allocating limited government re-sources to address the chronic undersupply of public goods and the nonprofit sector has taken on a growing role as a provider, a reality with myriad implications for public management, policy, and finance.A concluding chapter summarizes and integrates the findings and implications of the introduction and the three studies outlined above.

ISBN: 9798351409979Subjects--Topical Terms:

175462
Public administration.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Governance

Juris et de Jure: Reintegrating Law and Public Administration.
LDR:04953nmm a2200385 4500 001 636135
005 20230501063908.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 230724s2022 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798351409979
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29255066
035 $a AAI29255066
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Osorio, Andrew. $0 (orcid)0000-0002-3321-2363 $3 942477
245 1 0 $a Juris et de Jure: Reintegrating Law and Public Administration.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2022
300 $a 195 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-03, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: O'Leary, Rosemary.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Kansas, 2022.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
506 $a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
520 $a The legal foundation of American public administration is oft overlooked within the academic literature of the field. The absence of a cohesive research agenda on law and administration represents not only a major theoretical shortcoming but also a growing rift between the increasingly legalized practice of public administration and the re-search aims of a supposedly applied social science. One aspect of the remedy for these failings is a renewed engagement with academic fields occupied by questions of law and legal institutions. Therefore, ae explained in the introduction, the overarching purpose of this dissertation is to (1) analyze the ways in which law and courts affect governance when studied through the prism of public administration and legal scholarship and (2) demonstrate, through three distinct studies, the questions, theories, research settings, and methods that comprise an interdisciplinary approach to these fields.The lead study provides the first systematic and substantive assessment of Moe & Gilmour’s (1995, p. 135) assertion that “public administration has largely abandoned or forgotten its roots in public law-in the Constitution, statutes, and case law”. This work seeks a better sense of the subject matter, thematic concepts, and research settings within the public administration scholarship on law in order to assess the extent of the interdisciplinary effort necessary to reintegrate the fields. To do so, a sample taken from five generalist journals of public administration is analyzed via textual analysis to assess the last 20 years of mainstream public administration literature, exploring the extent to which law and public administration have integrated theoretically.The second study explores the effect of institutional design on the legitimacy of the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court by asking whether the plenary appointment power of the Chief Justice of the United States has resulted in an ideologically biased court. Measures of judicial ideology and statistical analyses are used to ex-amine whether judges appointed to this court are more likely to be conservative than the average federal judge. Beyond the immediate implications concerning the court’s oversight of our national security apparatus, this study furthers understanding of institutional design and judicial legitimacy as well as the chief justice’s role as an administrative actor in contexts beyond the Supreme Court, a function overlooked by the cur-rent literature.In the third piece, the tax expenditure of charitable giving to nonprofits is examined as a policy from (1) the administrative perspective of efficiency and effectiveness as a tool for providing public goods (using a meta-analysis of peer-reviewed studies to examine how government agency grants affect private donations to nonprofits) and (2) an historical vantage as a reflection of the organic sociolegal development of American public policy towards the taxation of charitable giving. This study is timely because during national crises—such as the current pandemic—nonprofits provide essential services and emergency assistance. However, despite their importance the question of how best to fund nonprofits remains unanswered. More broadly, one of the largest challenges for policymakers and public administrators is allocating limited government re-sources to address the chronic undersupply of public goods and the nonprofit sector has taken on a growing role as a provider, a reality with myriad implications for public management, policy, and finance.A concluding chapter summarizes and integrates the findings and implications of the introduction and the three studies outlined above.
590 $a School code: 0099.
650 4 $a Public administration. $3 175462
650 4 $a Law. $3 207600
653 $a Governance
653 $a Interdisciplinary research
653 $a Public administration
653 $a Public law
690 $a 0617
690 $a 0398
710 2 $a University of Kansas. $b Public Administration. $3 942478
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-03A.
790 $a 0099
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2022
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29255066