國立高雄大學圖資館 |

登入

回首頁

Judicial Independence in the Digital Age: The Challenges and Opportunities of Social Media for Judges.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Judicial Independence in the Digital Age: The Challenges and Opportunities of Social Media for Judges.
作者:	Hazlehurst, Lydia Jane.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2022
面頁冊數:	312 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-04, Section: A.
附註:	Advisor: Gordon, Michael;Reynolds, Stephanie.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-04A.
標題:	User behavior.
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29310619
ISBN:	9798351486512

Judicial Independence in the Digital Age: The Challenges and Opportunities of Social Media for Judges.
Hazlehurst, Lydia Jane.

Judicial Independence in the Digital Age: The Challenges and Opportunities of Social Media for Judges. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2022 - 312 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-04, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Liverpool (United Kingdom), 2022.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

This thesis questions the way judicial legitimacy is constructed – around the perception of independence – in the contemporary constitution, particularly in light of the advent of social media. It will be argued that judges should not be restricted from engaging with social media in their professional capacity and that at present the rules regulating a judge’s use of social media under the Guide to Judicial Conduct are unsuitable. This thesis will explore this restriction and the ways in which the perception of judicial independence is used as justification for restricting individual judicial office holders’ use of social media. Therefore, this thesis plugs the current gap in the literature exploring the relationship between the UK’s Judiciary and social media. Engaging critically with the doctrine of judicial independence in this context provides one way in which to reimagine the model of judicial legitimacy as it is currently derived from judicial independence, in favour of a model of legitimacy attained through public awareness and engagement. Therefore, this thesis will provide a timely and original analysis of the role of the Judiciary in the modern constitution.

ISBN: 9798351486512Subjects--Topical Terms:

942508
User behavior.

Judicial Independence in the Digital Age: The Challenges and Opportunities of Social Media for Judges.
LDR:02467nmm a2200409 4500 001 636152
005 20230501063912.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 230724s2022 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798351486512
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29310619
035 $a (MiAaPQ)Liverpool_3154030
035 $a AAI29310619
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Hazlehurst, Lydia Jane. $3 942507
245 1 0 $a Judicial Independence in the Digital Age: The Challenges and Opportunities of Social Media for Judges.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2022
300 $a 312 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-04, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Gordon, Michael;Reynolds, Stephanie.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Liverpool (United Kingdom), 2022.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a This thesis questions the way judicial legitimacy is constructed – around the perception of independence – in the contemporary constitution, particularly in light of the advent of social media. It will be argued that judges should not be restricted from engaging with social media in their professional capacity and that at present the rules regulating a judge’s use of social media under the Guide to Judicial Conduct are unsuitable. This thesis will explore this restriction and the ways in which the perception of judicial independence is used as justification for restricting individual judicial office holders’ use of social media. Therefore, this thesis plugs the current gap in the literature exploring the relationship between the UK’s Judiciary and social media. Engaging critically with the doctrine of judicial independence in this context provides one way in which to reimagine the model of judicial legitimacy as it is currently derived from judicial independence, in favour of a model of legitimacy attained through public awareness and engagement. Therefore, this thesis will provide a timely and original analysis of the role of the Judiciary in the modern constitution.
590 $a School code: 0722.
650 4 $a User behavior. $3 942508
650 4 $a Demographics. $3 942509
650 4 $a Politics. $3 351499
650 4 $a Judicial reviews. $3 942510
650 4 $a Restrictions. $3 942511
650 4 $a Official misconduct. $3 942512
650 4 $a Court hearings & proceedings. $3 942513
650 4 $a Privacy. $3 268519
650 4 $a Judiciary. $3 942514
650 4 $a Accountability. $3 942515
650 4 $a Judicial ethics. $3 727973
650 4 $a Constitutions. $3 187717
650 4 $a Perceptions. $3 942516
650 4 $a Constitutional law. $3 187716
650 4 $a Society. $2 eflch $3 462061
650 4 $a Sovereignty. $3 191772
650 4 $a Connectivity. $3 942517
650 4 $a Criminal investigations. $3 942518
650 4 $a Human rights. $3 174770
650 4 $a Education. $3 177995
650 4 $a Judges & magistrates. $3 942519
650 4 $a Demography. $3 235614
650 4 $a Ethics. $3 174971
650 4 $a Law. $3 207600
650 4 $a Law enforcement. $3 206676
650 4 $a Political science. $3 174710
650 4 $a Sociology. $3 176604
650 4 $a Web studies. $3 708690
690 $a 0515
690 $a 0938
690 $a 0394
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0206
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0626
690 $a 0646
710 2 $a The University of Liverpool (United Kingdom). $3 886615
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-04A.
790 $a 0722
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2022
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29310619