國立高雄大學圖資館 |

登入

回首頁

Debriefing in eu Public Procurement Law: A Critical Enquiry.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Debriefing in eu Public Procurement Law: A Critical Enquiry.
作者:	Yang, Chufan.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2023
面頁冊數:	203 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-05, Section: A.
附註:	Advisor: Eyo, Ama.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-05A.
標題:	Government purchasing.
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30674314
ISBN:	9798380723015

Debriefing in eu Public Procurement Law: A Critical Enquiry.
Yang, Chufan.

Debriefing in eu Public Procurement Law: A Critical Enquiry. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2023 - 203 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-05, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Bangor University (United Kingdom), 2023.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The thesis analyses transparency and competition in the procurement process using interdisciplinary studies in diverse fields of the European Union (EU) legal framework for systematic coherence and economic theories and models. The thesis views debriefing as an ideal device for observing those tensions. The main question that this thesis addresses is whether debriefing enhances the effectiveness of the EU public procurement system?The EU Parliament and Council’s 2014 public procurement package devoted to increasing transparency throughout procedures for higher efficiency and effectiveness and accordingly debriefing is a process meant to lead towards a fair, transparent, and efficient public procurement system. Debriefing is a procurement process designed to provide participants with access to a review of the contract award decision or the way to apply for effective remedies before a contract concludes. There is, however, a consensus that the EU Parliament and Council’s 2014 public procurement package has endorsed debriefing with overload transparency compliance by the PSD while producing adverse effects on fairness competition. In view of that, this thesis provides a critical enquiry into debriefing by investigating EU public procurement, administrative procedure, competition, and data protection law.In the dealing with those tensions, thesis takes an objective-oriented approach by designing a specialised coordinate system to observe three objectives for regulating debriefing – integrity, fairness, and economic efficiency. This thesis identifies these objectives by exploring the legal effectiveness of the PSD and the RD where debriefing placed in and explains their concept by breaking them down into elements, components, and criteria for measurement for further discussion. Align to these objectives, its investigation into economic theories behind debriefing, such as the game, social welfare, auction, and oligopoly, is necessary to develop a combination of economic positivism and legal positivism analysis. In view of this, the thesis explains the principal-agency problem a prioridetrimental to integrity for a public procurement system, measures the social cost of the procedure in reducing the cost of error and in enforcing substantive rules and, furthermore, forewarns the risk of collusive oligopoly when market players strategically use debriefing for repeated coordination. In addition, this thesis provides that coordinate system by empowering interdisciplinary studies, including the regulatory debriefing integrating the integrity tools of transparency and a monitoring system, a uniform judgement system for developing procedural rights such as of the rights to good administration and effective remedies in debriefing, the role of the principle of fairness connecting and formulating the data subject rights, confidentiality and trade secrets, the drawbacks of the principle of competition in controlling debriefing and the effectiveness of behavioural competition instruments. These are the main areas of focus for this thesis, which explores how they have and should been managed by using EU legal instruments, such as general principles, fundamental rights, and the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)’s precedents.

ISBN: 9798380723015Subjects--Topical Terms:

192136
Government purchasing.

Debriefing in eu Public Procurement Law: A Critical Enquiry.
LDR:04409nmm a2200349 4500 001 655845
005 20240414211947.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 240620s2023 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798380723015
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30674314
035 $a (MiAaPQ)Bangor_studenttheses46861125-d2be-4dad-8317-e7991db0f324
035 $a AAI30674314
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Yang, Chufan. $3 966998
245 1 0 $a Debriefing in eu Public Procurement Law: A Critical Enquiry.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2023
300 $a 203 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-05, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Eyo, Ama.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Bangor University (United Kingdom), 2023.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The thesis analyses transparency and competition in the procurement process using interdisciplinary studies in diverse fields of the European Union (EU) legal framework for systematic coherence and economic theories and models. The thesis views debriefing as an ideal device for observing those tensions. The main question that this thesis addresses is whether debriefing enhances the effectiveness of the EU public procurement system?The EU Parliament and Council’s 2014 public procurement package devoted to increasing transparency throughout procedures for higher efficiency and effectiveness and accordingly debriefing is a process meant to lead towards a fair, transparent, and efficient public procurement system. Debriefing is a procurement process designed to provide participants with access to a review of the contract award decision or the way to apply for effective remedies before a contract concludes. There is, however, a consensus that the EU Parliament and Council’s 2014 public procurement package has endorsed debriefing with overload transparency compliance by the PSD while producing adverse effects on fairness competition. In view of that, this thesis provides a critical enquiry into debriefing by investigating EU public procurement, administrative procedure, competition, and data protection law.In the dealing with those tensions, thesis takes an objective-oriented approach by designing a specialised coordinate system to observe three objectives for regulating debriefing – integrity, fairness, and economic efficiency. This thesis identifies these objectives by exploring the legal effectiveness of the PSD and the RD where debriefing placed in and explains their concept by breaking them down into elements, components, and criteria for measurement for further discussion. Align to these objectives, its investigation into economic theories behind debriefing, such as the game, social welfare, auction, and oligopoly, is necessary to develop a combination of economic positivism and legal positivism analysis. In view of this, the thesis explains the principal-agency problem a prioridetrimental to integrity for a public procurement system, measures the social cost of the procedure in reducing the cost of error and in enforcing substantive rules and, furthermore, forewarns the risk of collusive oligopoly when market players strategically use debriefing for repeated coordination. In addition, this thesis provides that coordinate system by empowering interdisciplinary studies, including the regulatory debriefing integrating the integrity tools of transparency and a monitoring system, a uniform judgement system for developing procedural rights such as of the rights to good administration and effective remedies in debriefing, the role of the principle of fairness connecting and formulating the data subject rights, confidentiality and trade secrets, the drawbacks of the principle of competition in controlling debriefing and the effectiveness of behavioural competition instruments. These are the main areas of focus for this thesis, which explores how they have and should been managed by using EU legal instruments, such as general principles, fundamental rights, and the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)’s precedents.
590 $a School code: 8864.
650 4 $a Government purchasing. $3 192136
650 4 $a Judicial reviews. $3 942510
650 4 $a Corruption. $3 399227
650 4 $a Monitoring systems. $3 966999
650 4 $a Accountability. $3 942515
650 4 $a Confidentiality. $3 896546
650 4 $a Freedom of information. $3 300201
650 4 $a Law. $3 207600
650 4 $a Provisions. $3 967000
650 4 $a Government contracts. $3 967001
650 4 $a Human rights. $3 174770
650 4 $a Bids. $3 966962
650 4 $a Equal rights. $3 915610
650 4 $a Political science. $3 174710
690 $a 0511
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0615
710 2 $a Bangor University (United Kingdom). $3 942407
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-05A.
790 $a 8864
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2023
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30674314