國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ subject:"Freedom of religion." ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Free exercise of religion in the lib...

Gill, Emily R.

Free exercise of religion in the liberal polityconflicting interpretations /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Free exercise of religion in the liberal polityby Emily R. Gill.
其他題名:	conflicting interpretations /
作者:	Gill, Emily R.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing :2019.
面頁冊數:	xv, 296 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	Freedom of religion.
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25037-9
ISBN:	9783030250379$q(electronic bk.)

Free exercise of religion in the liberal polityconflicting interpretations /
Gill, Emily R.

Free exercise of religion in the liberal polityconflicting interpretations /[electronic resource] :by Emily R. Gill. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2019. - xv, 296 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - Palgrave studies in religion, politics, and policy. - Palgrave studies in religion, politics, and policy..

1. Introduction -- 2. Varieties of Neutrality -- 3. Free Exercise of Religion and Public Funds -- 4. Private Voluntary Organizations -- 5. Exemption Issues in Religious Belief and Practice -- 6. Marriage and Intimate Relationships -- 7. Conclusion.

This book addresses the challenge of providing for the free exercise of religion without allowing religious exercise by some individuals and groups to impinge upon the conscientious convictions of others. State neutrality toward religion is impossible, because neutrality means inattention to religion for some, but leveling the playing field through accommodations or exemptions for others. Both formal and substantive neutrality have a place in addressing particular conflicts. One such example is public funding for religiously affiliated social service programs, for which neither type of neutrality is satisfactory and thus some restrictions are justifiable; conversely, private voluntary organizations that do not receive direct public funding should be allowed wide latitude regarding their practices. This title also examines the expansive free exercise claims that are now made by those who argue that following the law impinges upon their beliefs, as exemplified by the ministerial exception and the Hobby Lobby and Masterpiece Cakeshop Supreme Court cases. It concludes by analyzing the relationship between neutrality and marriage as a civil status, which impacts a variety of commitment types and plural marriage.

ISBN: 9783030250379$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-25037-9doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

320337
Freedom of religion.

LC Class. No.: BV741 / .G55 2019

Dewey Class. No.: 261.72

Free exercise of religion in the liberal polityconflicting interpretations /
LDR:02541nmm a2200337 a 4500 001 587339
003 DE-He213
005 20200705042105.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 210326s2019 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783030250379$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783030250362$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-25037-9 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-25037-9
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a BV741 $b .G55 2019
072 7 $a HRAM $2 bicssc
072 7 $a SOC039000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a QRAM $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 261.72 $2 23
090 $a BV741 $b .G475 2019
100 1 $a Gill, Emily R. $3 878918
245 1 0 $a Free exercise of religion in the liberal polity $h [electronic resource] : $b conflicting interpretations / $c by Emily R. Gill.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan, $c 2019.
300 $a xv, 296 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Palgrave studies in religion, politics, and policy
505 0 $a 1. Introduction -- 2. Varieties of Neutrality -- 3. Free Exercise of Religion and Public Funds -- 4. Private Voluntary Organizations -- 5. Exemption Issues in Religious Belief and Practice -- 6. Marriage and Intimate Relationships -- 7. Conclusion.
520 $a This book addresses the challenge of providing for the free exercise of religion without allowing religious exercise by some individuals and groups to impinge upon the conscientious convictions of others. State neutrality toward religion is impossible, because neutrality means inattention to religion for some, but leveling the playing field through accommodations or exemptions for others. Both formal and substantive neutrality have a place in addressing particular conflicts. One such example is public funding for religiously affiliated social service programs, for which neither type of neutrality is satisfactory and thus some restrictions are justifiable; conversely, private voluntary organizations that do not receive direct public funding should be allowed wide latitude regarding their practices. This title also examines the expansive free exercise claims that are now made by those who argue that following the law impinges upon their beliefs, as exemplified by the ministerial exception and the Hobby Lobby and Masterpiece Cakeshop Supreme Court cases. It concludes by analyzing the relationship between neutrality and marriage as a civil status, which impacts a variety of commitment types and plural marriage.
650 0 $a Freedom of religion. $3 320337
650 0 $a Liberalism. $3 175075
650 0 $a Liberty. $3 175243
650 1 4 $a Religion and Society. $3 740061
650 2 4 $a Politics and Religion. $3 776292
650 2 4 $a US Politics. $3 740134
650 2 4 $a Political Theory. $3 560010
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
830 0 $a Palgrave studies in religion, politics, and policy. $3 686832
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25037-9
950 $a Religion and Philosophy (SpringerNature-41175)