國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ subject:"Ethics, Modern." ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Reason and emotion in international ...

Jeffery, Renee.

Reason and emotion in international ethics

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Reason and emotion in international ethicsRenee Jeffery.
其他題名:	Reason & Emotion in International Ethics
作者:	Jeffery, Renee.
出版者:	Cambridge :Cambridge University Press,2014.
面頁冊數:	ix, 252 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
標題:	Ethics, Modern.
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139764407
ISBN:	9781139764407$q(electronic bk.)

Reason and emotion in international ethics
Jeffery, Renee.

Reason and emotion in international ethics[electronic resource] /Reason & Emotion in International EthicsRenee Jeffery. - Cambridge :Cambridge University Press,2014. - ix, 252 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.

1. Ethics, emotions, and the human brain -- 2. Rationalist cosmopolitan solutions to the problem of world poverty -- 3. Moral sentiment theory -- 4. The demise of moral sentiment theory -- 5. What is an emotion? -- 6. Moral judgment after neuroscience -- 7. A sentimental solution.

The study of international ethics is marked by an overwhelming bias towards reasoned reflection at the expense of emotionally driven moral deliberation. For rationalist cosmopolitans in particular, reason alone provides the means by which we can arrive at the truly impartial moral judgments a cosmopolitan ethic demands. However, are the emotions as irrational, selfish and partial as most rationalist cosmopolitans would have us believe? By re-examining the central claims of the eighteenth-century moral sentiment theorists in light of cutting-edge discoveries in the fields of neuroscience and psychology, Renee Jeffery argues that the dominance of rationalism and marginalisation of emotions from theories of global ethics cannot be justified. In its place she develops a sentimentalist cosmopolitan ethic that does not simply provide a framework for identifying injustices and prescribing how we ought to respond to them, but which actually motivates action in response to international injustices such as global poverty.

ISBN: 9781139764407$q(electronic bk.)Subjects--Topical Terms:

288469
Ethics, Modern.

LC Class. No.: BJ1031 / .J43 2014

Dewey Class. No.: 171.2

Reason and emotion in international ethics
LDR:02103nmm a2200265 a 4500 001 560395
003 UkCbUP
005 20151005020621.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 200113s2014 enk o 1 0 eng d
020 $a 9781139764407$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9781107037410$q(paper)
035 $a CR9781139764407
040 $a UkCbUP $b eng $c UkCbUP $d GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a BJ1031 $b .J43 2014
082 0 4 $a 171.2 $2 23
090 $a BJ1031 $b .J45 2014
100 1 $a Jeffery, Renee. $3 773352
245 1 0 $a Reason and emotion in international ethics $h [electronic resource] / $c Renee Jeffery.
246 3 $a Reason & Emotion in International Ethics
260 $a Cambridge : $b Cambridge University Press, $c 2014.
300 $a ix, 252 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
505 0 $a 1. Ethics, emotions, and the human brain -- 2. Rationalist cosmopolitan solutions to the problem of world poverty -- 3. Moral sentiment theory -- 4. The demise of moral sentiment theory -- 5. What is an emotion? -- 6. Moral judgment after neuroscience -- 7. A sentimental solution.
520 $a The study of international ethics is marked by an overwhelming bias towards reasoned reflection at the expense of emotionally driven moral deliberation. For rationalist cosmopolitans in particular, reason alone provides the means by which we can arrive at the truly impartial moral judgments a cosmopolitan ethic demands. However, are the emotions as irrational, selfish and partial as most rationalist cosmopolitans would have us believe? By re-examining the central claims of the eighteenth-century moral sentiment theorists in light of cutting-edge discoveries in the fields of neuroscience and psychology, Renee Jeffery argues that the dominance of rationalism and marginalisation of emotions from theories of global ethics cannot be justified. In its place she develops a sentimentalist cosmopolitan ethic that does not simply provide a framework for identifying injustices and prescribing how we ought to respond to them, but which actually motivates action in response to international injustices such as global poverty.
650 0 $a Ethics, Modern. $3 288469
650 0 $a Reason. $3 177715
650 0 $a Rationalism. $3 175963
650 0 $a Emotions (Philosophy) $3 211251
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139764407