國立高雄大學圖資館 |

On coordination in non-cooperative game theoryexplaining how and why an equilibrium occurs and prevails /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	On coordination in non-cooperative game theoryby Lauren Larrouy.
其他題名:	explaining how and why an equilibrium occurs and prevails /
作者:	Larrouy, Lauren.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing :2023.
面頁冊數:	xvii, 340 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	Noncooperative games (Mathematics)
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36171-5
ISBN:	9783031361715$q(electronic bk.)

On coordination in non-cooperative game theoryexplaining how and why an equilibrium occurs and prevails /
Larrouy, Lauren.

On coordination in non-cooperative game theoryexplaining how and why an equilibrium occurs and prevails /[electronic resource] :by Lauren Larrouy. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2023. - xvii, 340 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - Springer studies in the history of economic thought,2662-6101. - Springer studies in the history of economic thought..

Chapter 1. Introduction -- Chapter 2. A critical assessment of the evolution of standard game theory -- Chapter 3. Schelling's reorientation of game theory: toward a theory of interdependent decisions -- Chapter 4. Bacharach: How the Variable Frame and Team Reasoning Theories challenge standard noncooperative game theory -- Chapter 5. A new frame for intersubjectivity in game theory: the insights of the Theories of Mind and Simulation -- Chapter 6. On the use of mindreading and mindshaping in game theory: incorporation of players' mental states and endogenization of players' beliefs -- Chapter 7. General Conclusion -- Chapter 8. Appendix.

By offering a critical assessment of the evolution of standard game theory, this book argues for a shift in the ontology and methodology of game theory for appraising games, one based on understanding the players' strategic reasoning process. Analyzing the history of economic thought, the book highlights the methodological issues faced by standard game theory in its treatment of strategic reasoning and the consequence it has on the status of players' beliefs. It also highlights how the two original contributions of T. C. Schelling and M. Bacharach can be applied to these issues. Furthermore, the book assesses the intersubjective dimension in games by applying the cognitive sciences and by integrating simulation theory into game theory. Consequently, this book offers an interdisciplinary approach for reassessing the nature of the intersubjectivity involved in strategic reasoning. It shows that the analysis of games should involve the study and identification of the reasoning process that leads the players to a specific outcome, i.e., to a specific solution. A game should not be understood (as is done in standard game theory) as a mathematical representation of an individual choice at equilibrium. This requires investigating the players' capacity for coordination. Understanding the process of coordination allows us to understand strategic reasoning and ultimately to provide new answers to the indeterminacy problem, one of the central hurdles in game theory, and one that underscores its normative difficulties.

ISBN: 9783031361715$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-031-36171-5doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

185921
Noncooperative games (Mathematics)

LC Class. No.: QA272.5 / .L37 2023

Dewey Class. No.: 519.3

On coordination in non-cooperative game theoryexplaining how and why an equilibrium occurs and prevails /
LDR:03289nmm a2200337 a 4500 001 647599
003 DE-He213
005 20230817101719.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 240116s2023 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783031361715$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783031361708$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-031-36171-5 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-031-36171-5
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a QA272.5 $b .L37 2023
072 7 $a KCA $2 bicssc
072 7 $a BUS069000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a KCA $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 519.3 $2 23
090 $a QA272.5 $b .L334 2023
100 1 $a Larrouy, Lauren. $3 956988
245 1 0 $a On coordination in non-cooperative game theory $h [electronic resource] : $b explaining how and why an equilibrium occurs and prevails / $c by Lauren Larrouy.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2023.
300 $a xvii, 340 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Springer studies in the history of economic thought, $x 2662-6101
505 0 $a Chapter 1. Introduction -- Chapter 2. A critical assessment of the evolution of standard game theory -- Chapter 3. Schelling's reorientation of game theory: toward a theory of interdependent decisions -- Chapter 4. Bacharach: How the Variable Frame and Team Reasoning Theories challenge standard noncooperative game theory -- Chapter 5. A new frame for intersubjectivity in game theory: the insights of the Theories of Mind and Simulation -- Chapter 6. On the use of mindreading and mindshaping in game theory: incorporation of players' mental states and endogenization of players' beliefs -- Chapter 7. General Conclusion -- Chapter 8. Appendix.
520 $a By offering a critical assessment of the evolution of standard game theory, this book argues for a shift in the ontology and methodology of game theory for appraising games, one based on understanding the players' strategic reasoning process. Analyzing the history of economic thought, the book highlights the methodological issues faced by standard game theory in its treatment of strategic reasoning and the consequence it has on the status of players' beliefs. It also highlights how the two original contributions of T. C. Schelling and M. Bacharach can be applied to these issues. Furthermore, the book assesses the intersubjective dimension in games by applying the cognitive sciences and by integrating simulation theory into game theory. Consequently, this book offers an interdisciplinary approach for reassessing the nature of the intersubjectivity involved in strategic reasoning. It shows that the analysis of games should involve the study and identification of the reasoning process that leads the players to a specific outcome, i.e., to a specific solution. A game should not be understood (as is done in standard game theory) as a mathematical representation of an individual choice at equilibrium. This requires investigating the players' capacity for coordination. Understanding the process of coordination allows us to understand strategic reasoning and ultimately to provide new answers to the indeterminacy problem, one of the central hurdles in game theory, and one that underscores its normative difficulties.
650 0 $a Noncooperative games (Mathematics) $3 185921
650 1 4 $a History of Economic Thought and Methodology. $3 919316
650 2 4 $a Game Theory. $3 737094
650 2 4 $a Philosophy of Mind. $3 276634
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
830 0 $a Springer studies in the history of economic thought. $3 858660
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36171-5
950 $a Economics and Finance (SpringerNature-41170)