國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ subject:"Philosophy of Science." ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The structure of interdisciplinary s...

Hvidtfeldt, Rolf.

The structure of interdisciplinary science

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The structure of interdisciplinary scienceby Rolf Hvidtfeldt.
作者:	Hvidtfeldt, Rolf.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing :2018.
面頁冊數:	xvii, 295 p. :digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
標題:	Interdisciplinary research.
電子資源:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90872-4
ISBN:	9783319908724$q(electronic bk.)

The structure of interdisciplinary science
Hvidtfeldt, Rolf.

The structure of interdisciplinary science[electronic resource] /by Rolf Hvidtfeldt. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2018. - xvii, 295 p. :digital ;24 cm. - New directions in the philosophy of science. - New directions in the philosophy of science..

1. Introduction -- 2. Disciplines and Approaches -- 3. Interdisciplinarity studies -- 4. The Relevance of Philosophy -- 5. Representation- 6. Pluralisms, Perspectives, and Potential Problems -- 7. Representational Crossbreeding -- 8. Phenomenology Imported With Ease -- 9. Conclusion -- Index.

This book presents a novel approach to the analysis of interdisciplinary science based on the contemporary philosophical literature on scientific representation. The basic motivation for developing this approach is that epistemic issues are insufficiently dealt with in the existing literature on interdisciplinarity. This means that when interdisciplinary science is praised (as it often is), it is far from clear to what extent this praise is merited - at least if one cares about various more or less standardised measures of scientific quality. To develop a more adequate way of capturing what is going on in interdisciplinary science, I draw inspiration from the rich philosophical literature on modelling, idealisation, perspectivism, and scientific pluralism. The discussion hereof reveals a number of critical pitfalls related to transferring mathematical and conceptual tools between scientific contexts, which should be relevant and interesting for anyone actively engaged in funding, evaluating, or carrying out interdisciplinary science.

ISBN: 9783319908724$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-90872-4doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

275434
Interdisciplinary research.

LC Class. No.: Q180.55.I48 / H853 2018

Dewey Class. No.: 001.4

The structure of interdisciplinary science
LDR:02335nmm a2200325 a 4500 001 540956
003 DE-He213
005 20190116132240.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 190308s2018 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783319908724$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783319908717$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-90872-4 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-90872-4
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a Q180.55.I48 $b H853 2018
072 7 $a PDA $2 bicssc
072 7 $a SCI075000 $2 bisacsh
082 0 4 $a 001.4 $2 23
090 $a Q180.55.I48 $b H989 2018
100 1 $a Hvidtfeldt, Rolf. $3 819496
245 1 4 $a The structure of interdisciplinary science $h [electronic resource] / $c by Rolf Hvidtfeldt.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan, $c 2018.
300 $a xvii, 295 p. : $b digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a New directions in the philosophy of science
505 0 $a 1. Introduction -- 2. Disciplines and Approaches -- 3. Interdisciplinarity studies -- 4. The Relevance of Philosophy -- 5. Representation- 6. Pluralisms, Perspectives, and Potential Problems -- 7. Representational Crossbreeding -- 8. Phenomenology Imported With Ease -- 9. Conclusion -- Index.
520 $a This book presents a novel approach to the analysis of interdisciplinary science based on the contemporary philosophical literature on scientific representation. The basic motivation for developing this approach is that epistemic issues are insufficiently dealt with in the existing literature on interdisciplinarity. This means that when interdisciplinary science is praised (as it often is), it is far from clear to what extent this praise is merited - at least if one cares about various more or less standardised measures of scientific quality. To develop a more adequate way of capturing what is going on in interdisciplinary science, I draw inspiration from the rich philosophical literature on modelling, idealisation, perspectivism, and scientific pluralism. The discussion hereof reveals a number of critical pitfalls related to transferring mathematical and conceptual tools between scientific contexts, which should be relevant and interesting for anyone actively engaged in funding, evaluating, or carrying out interdisciplinary science.
650 0 $a Interdisciplinary research. $3 275434
650 1 4 $a Philosophy. $3 176573
650 2 4 $a Philosophy of Science. $3 277156
650 2 4 $a Epistemology. $3 275100
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
830 0 $a New directions in the philosophy of science. $3 643605
856 4 0 $u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90872-4
950 $a Religion and Philosophy (Springer-41175)