國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ subject:"POLITICAL SCIENCE / Public Policy / Social Policy" ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Money, mandates, and local control i...

Project Muse.

Money, mandates, and local control in American public education

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Money, mandates, and local control in American public educationBryan Shelly.
作者:	Shelly, Bryan.
出版者:	Ann Arbor :University of Michigan Press,2011.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (viii, 200 p.) :ill.
標題:	Educational accountabilityUnited States.
電子資源:	Full text available:
ISBN:	9780472026739 (electronic bk.)

Money, mandates, and local control in American public education
Shelly, Bryan.

Money, mandates, and local control in American public education[electronic resource] /Bryan Shelly. - Ann Arbor :University of Michigan Press,2011. - 1 online resource (viii, 200 p.) :ill.

Includes bibliographical references and index.

"'This book is outstanding. . . . No one has delved into the issue of school financing with such depth, data and thoughtful analysis. It issimply the best in the field.' Susan B. Neuman, University of MichiganPointing to the disparities between wealthy and impoverished school districts in areas where revenue depends primarily upon local taxes, reformers repeatedly call for the centralization of school funding.Their proposals meet resistance from citizens, elected officials, and school administrators who fear the loss of local autonomy.Bryan Shelly finds, however, that local autonomy hasalready been compromised by federal and state governments, which exercise a tremendous amount of control over public education despite their small contribution to a school systems funding. This disproportionate relationship between funding and control allows state and federal officials to pass education policy yet excuses them from supplying adequate funding for new programs. The resulting unfunded and underfunded mandates and regulations, Shelly insists, are the true cause of the loss of community control over public education. Hedemonstrates the effects of the most infamous of underfunded federal mandates, the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB), and explores why schools implemented it despite its unpopularity and out-of-pocket costs. Shellys findings hold significant implications for school finance reform, NCLB, and the future of intergovernmental relations."--

ISBN: 9780472026739 (electronic bk.)Subjects--Topical Terms:

288014
Educational accountability
--United States.

LC Class. No.: LB2825 / .S45 2011

Dewey Class. No.: 379.73

Money, mandates, and local control in American public education
LDR:02506cmm a22003014a 4500 001 396316
003 BmJHUP
005 20130419142203.0
006 m f d u
007 cr un uuauu
008 131212s2011 miua sb 001 0 eng d
010 $z 2011000477
020 $a 9780472026739 (electronic bk.)
020 $a 0472026739 (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9780472117659 (hbk.)
020 $a 0472117653 (hbk.)
035 $a MUSE102547
040 $a MdBmJHUP $c MdBmJHUP
041 0 $a eng
043 $a n-us---
050 0 0 $a LB2825 $b .S45 2011
082 0 0 $a 379.73 $2 22
100 1 $a Shelly, Bryan. $3 628601
245 1 0 $a Money, mandates, and local control in American public education $h [electronic resource] / $c Bryan Shelly.
260 $a Ann Arbor : $b University of Michigan Press, $c 2011. $e (Baltimore, Md. : $f Project MUSE, $g 2013)
300 $a 1 online resource (viii, 200 p.) : $b ill.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references and index.
520 $a "'This book is outstanding. . . . No one has delved into the issue of school financing with such depth, data and thoughtful analysis. It issimply the best in the field.' Susan B. Neuman, University of MichiganPointing to the disparities between wealthy and impoverished school districts in areas where revenue depends primarily upon local taxes, reformers repeatedly call for the centralization of school funding.Their proposals meet resistance from citizens, elected officials, and school administrators who fear the loss of local autonomy.Bryan Shelly finds, however, that local autonomy hasalready been compromised by federal and state governments, which exercise a tremendous amount of control over public education despite their small contribution to a school systems funding. This disproportionate relationship between funding and control allows state and federal officials to pass education policy yet excuses them from supplying adequate funding for new programs. The resulting unfunded and underfunded mandates and regulations, Shelly insists, are the true cause of the loss of community control over public education. Hedemonstrates the effects of the most infamous of underfunded federal mandates, the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB), and explores why schools implemented it despite its unpopularity and out-of-pocket costs. Shellys findings hold significant implications for school finance reform, NCLB, and the future of intergovernmental relations."-- $c Provided by publisher.
588 $a Description based on print version record.
650 0 $a Educational accountability $z United States. $3 288014
650 0 $a Education $z United States $x Finance. $3 231282
650 7 $a EDUCATION / Educational Policy & Reform / General $2 bisacsh $3 564532
650 7 $a POLITICAL SCIENCE / Public Policy / Social Policy $2 bisacsh $3 566113
650 0 $a Educational change $z United States. $3 193394
650 0 $a Educational equalization $z United States. $3 278558
650 0 $a Education and state $z United States. $3 181191
710 2 $a Project Muse. $3 619504
856 4 0 $z Full text available: $u http://muse.jhu.edu/books/9780472026739/