| 摘要註: |
本研究旨在探討都市公共政策發展過程中,納入民眾參與的一種新的解決方法。臺灣傳統的公共政策制定在民主化過程中雖已建立了民眾參與的內涵及形式,如說明會、公聽會、問卷調查、公民投票、公民會議等,但當前都市公共政策制定過程所引發的各種社會衝突,呈顯出現階段的政府在回應民意上,仍存在著諸多限制。從學術角度觀察之,民眾參與長期以來一直是都市治理相關論述最核心和焦慮的課題。國際上都市公共政策的發展,在過去社會運動的伴隨下,逐漸走向「開放的共識城市」的治理理想,其中民眾參與不僅在技術上,更甚至在核心價值與理論論述上皆有了全新的視野和行動,民眾參與不僅是其心聲與意見的掌握,也亦非單純於權利價值與利益的代理,背後深刻的呈顯出公共利益價值被承載的新經驗,進而透過溝通與對話的過程降低誤解和衝突的發生。其重要的核心概念與操作精神,涵蓋了開放的共識城市、維基城市、權益關係人對話等方式,這些經驗的操作方式與理念,其實都展現出在處理社會衝突全新向度的可能。因此,本研究將以臺灣都市公共政策發展過程之衝突面對與斡旋作為論述基礎,並同時深入研究維基城市的操作模式、開放的共識城市之治理理念,及權益關係人的對話,將研究國際上新的操作經驗在面對城市衝突的調節與促成一個公共政策發展上存在著何種理論的可能性,以及在城市實踐上是否有一套操作模式可以在公共政策發展上被引述出來。藉由在國際理論的論述架構下,並實際運用於當前高雄車站轉型設計案之都市公共議題參與採取此模式演練過程,初步探討出一套創新性與開放性的決策模式,來解決臺灣在都市公共政策所面臨的衝突及民意的落差現象。 The core purpose of the study on the new solution that examines the inclusion of public participation in the decision-making process of urban development. Although Taiwan's traditional public policy making during the democratic process has established the contents and formats of public participation such as public hearings, seminars, questionnaire survey, or referendum, yet all possible social conflicts triggered by urban development policies punctuates the difficulties and insufficiency of public participation channel at the current stage. From the academic perspective, public participation for the long run has been the core and most anxious issue of urban governance. The development of international urban policies along with the past social movement has gradually moved to the governance philosophy of “open consensus city.” Public participation not only lies in the technology but also demonstrates brand new vision and action in both core value and theoretical discourse. Public participation shows the public will and expresses the public opinion, and it is not the pure agent of value and interest. Behind it, there is new experience of loaded public interest value, and through the process of communication and dialogue, misunderstanding and conflicts are avoided.This study uses the conflicts encountered and negotiated during the formation of Taiwan's urban development policies as the discourse basis and at the same time, examines deeply the operational model of Wikicity and open city on governance philosophy as well as dialogues between stakeholders. We then discusses the possibility of the existence of a theory that presents the new operational model of the international community to negotiate urban conflicts faced and facilitate public policy development as well as the discovery of a set of operational model for urban practices. As a result, under the discourse framework of international theories as well as the participation in public issues and the adoption of this model for simulation process on the urban issue of the rebuilding of Kaohsiung Train Station, we study and establish a set of innovative and open operational model of policy making for full public participation to solve conflicts faced and Public opinion gap phenomenon in Taiwan's urban public policy development. |